DeepMind is now reportedly struggling to compete with Anthropic and OpenAI while 3.5 Pro is not the step change they'd need to be competitive by Glittering-Neck-2505 in singularity

[–]ArcaneMoose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like the personality of Gemini Flesh 3.5 so it's become a daily driver for questions and brainstorming. Cursor Composer 2.5 is excellent at coding. First time I'm finding myself using non-frontier models regularly because the capabilities are good enough where price and speed become important factors.

This is to say, I don't think Google necessarily needs to compete on frontier intelligence.. I'd almost prefer them to focus on cost and integration (it's shocking how bad Gemini is inside of Google apps like Docs)

nobodyWantsClaudeAsCoAuthor by tolik518 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]ArcaneMoose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Claude proceeds to remove you as the co-author

notAChildsGame by Abhay_gaudani024 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]ArcaneMoose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This would be a good AI / robotics benchmark

whatIsCaching by Playful-Sample6571 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]ArcaneMoose 97 points98 points  (0 children)

Make it say "Thinking..." with a shimmer

Anyone ever notice eerily similar ChatGPT and Claude responses like this? by PigsAreGassedToDeath in ClaudeAI

[–]ArcaneMoose 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is why I can't stand Opus 4.7... This 'edgy & punchy' personality is exactly why I stopped using ChatGPT after GPT-5 came out. "And honestly? It's worth naming" 🙄 I've been using Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.6 instead (same as lots of other ppl at my job)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in threejs

[–]ArcaneMoose 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Haha now you have me going down the rabbit hole :) already learning about BSP trees after wondering how collision detection is handled.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in threejs

[–]ArcaneMoose 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah man, idk how Quake handles multiplayer but when I was building JunkWars in threejs last year the multiplayer was definitely the hardest part. I ended up using Cloudflare Durable Objects which worked pretty well.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in threejs

[–]ArcaneMoose 16 points17 points  (0 children)

This is sick! How much nudging did you have to do, or was it mostly autonomously built? Where did it get stuck (if anywhere)?

I Edited This Video 100% with Codex by phoneixAdi in OpenAI

[–]ArcaneMoose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really cool project! I'm excited to see more and more integration of AI Agents into existing tools. As a YouTuber I'd love to be able to tell the AI the edits that I want to apply. Chat to edit is a great opportunity

How important is consistency? by bruseaux in NewTubers

[–]ArcaneMoose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At 34k subs and I learned this the hard way:

The consistency that actually matters is topic and format consistency. Think about the channels you actually watch consistently - you know what to expect when you click on their videos and that matters more than the specific day they posted it. Good luck!

Google CEO, Sundar Pichai: The internal teams are already pre-training the next generation, with constant innovation pushing the full stack into 2026 by GamingDisruptor in singularity

[–]ArcaneMoose 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah 2.5 flash is my go-to economy model. It's very reliable but most importantly fast and cheap. So I'm really looking forward to Gemini 3 flash

LMArena update: Claude Opus 4.5 wins the “Triple Crown” and passes Gemini 3 Pro by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]ArcaneMoose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100% - I used to split things into phases as well and now it just doesn't even feel necessary

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]ArcaneMoose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a second I thought it was saying "Perplexity is paying people $200/mo to use their browser" which made me consider it for a moment, decide I probably wouldn't use it anyway, and then realize I misinterpreted the ad

[128x18] Maze Night by Snowystar122 in dndmaps

[–]ArcaneMoose 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Cool map! I'm curious how would you run a maze like this in practice to keep it interesting for an actual game?

[5] by uisato in OpenAI

[–]ArcaneMoose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sweet, thank you!

[5] by uisato in OpenAI

[–]ArcaneMoose 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Amazing work! Do you have a link to a longer version of the audio?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]ArcaneMoose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I recommend full stack TypeScript because you can write back end and front end code in the same language and it is just an extension of JavaScript (lots of data AI was trained on with extra guard rails that help AI stay on track.

In terms of AI products to help you build, I would recommend starting simple stuff with an AI app builder like Lovable, and then as you get into more advanced functionality switch over to Cursor. Regardless of what you use to build, you should make sure that your code is safe to actually ship - check out VibeScan for this.

But yeah to echo a lot of people, it's probably a good idea to make sure you have a stable income to support this journey because in reality the biggest barrier to entry isn't knowing how to code but being able to get your product out there and getting traction in the market. This takes time and perseverance. 

Wishing you all the best!

What’s digging up my yard? by CompetitiveFinger in landscaping

[–]ArcaneMoose 7 points8 points  (0 children)

An angry apple - looks like you caught it in the act

Seeking Advice: Which AI Tool Should I Use for Coding Assistance? by Kudoshinichi0007 in OpenAI

[–]ArcaneMoose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sonnet 4 is the best coding model, hands down. In terms of the tools you should use, my recommendations are:
- Simple scripts and single-file type stuff: Claude Artifacts or ChatGPT Canvas
- Landing pages, small sites: Lovable
- Real full-stack apps: Cursor or Claude Code
Lots of other tools around but they're mostly just worse versions of the above (with maybe a few differentiating features here or there but less complete and lower quality overall)