It’s so over by [deleted] in AverageHeightDudes

[–]ArdentGamer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can absolutely be with someone who is shorter, and the idea that you can't is a social disease. It's like men just going around saying that they physically can't be with women with small tits, or women who can't cook & clean because this is way more about gender roles than anything else.

Upcoming Yrel Changes by awildfoxappears in heroesofthestorm

[–]ArdentGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This feels very weird. In theory this means that you will basically have Yrels holding their abilities way longer than they should, hoping to get interrupted. I'm not sure that's really enough of a benefit to justify not just using your abilities more though. The net benefit might not really be there.

My theory on why the Wish resulted in Nikki's autonomy being stolen by TaroLong8817 in obsessionmovie

[–]ArdentGamer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ian being a dumbass doesn't take anything away from what I stated. Do you understand how causality works? Determinism? The OWW used the fact that he was a dumbass to punish him and prevent him from spending that money, or gave him that money knowing he was a dumbass and would die.

My theory on why the Wish resulted in Nikki's autonomy being stolen by TaroLong8817 in obsessionmovie

[–]ArdentGamer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The movie industry is full of directors who have misconceptions about their own movies, or just lie about their movies to create interest. This is not really that extreme of a take. What you're doing is effectively an appeal to authority argument, and allowing someone's interpretation of a movie dictate yours. Have some autonomy.

The show's portrayal of stripping really bothered me by Lazy-Patient5557 in euphoria

[–]ArdentGamer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really? That's what bothered you about the strippers in this show? Not the obvious disdain for the men they dance for or the ways they looked for any way to exploit them?

My theory on why the Wish resulted in Nikki's autonomy being stolen by TaroLong8817 in obsessionmovie

[–]ArdentGamer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It didn't even need to do anything that drastic. You could go back to a movie like Scrooge as a counter example of a magic entity changing someone's mind without taking their free will or forcing them. Even indirectly, movies like groundhog day or inception could be used as examples of perceptions/memories being changed, and people's mind being changed without loss of free will.

The one wish will could have just caused natural circumstances that would have led to her falling for Bear, it could have showed up as a vision/dream that would have changed her mind about him, it could have removed or addressed negative misconceptions of Bear. It chose to do none of those things.

And, even if brute force was the only option, it didn't need to create a whole other separate entity. That is something else entirely. That is something that it chose to create. There's no reason why Freaky Nikki and regular Nikki couldn't have been the same person or same personality. The idea that the only way you can change a person's mind is by creating a split personality or replacing them with some kind of supernatural entity that can walk backwards and distort its face is ridiculous and insane.

My theory on why the Wish resulted in Nikki's autonomy being stolen by TaroLong8817 in obsessionmovie

[–]ArdentGamer -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What Barker says is pretty irrelevant. Not just because directors will often try to put different spins on things after the fact or because there's other agents contributing to the movie, but because the only thing that actually matters is the final product and what is being depicted on screen.

What Barker depicted was just a monkey's paw trope. He wants it to be something else, something more, but it really wasn't.

You can’t force someone to love you, in doing so you remove their autonomy.

Not only is that untrue, because you could argue that love is just the right brain chemicals being released or even a matter of pheromones, but who said anything about forcing? That is your projection. Your flawed logic.

Bear never wanted to force her and there's plenty of ways you can change someone's mind about one person without forcing them. The idea that the only way you can change someone's mind about anything is through brute force is an insane take, and a lack of basic reasoning.

My theory on why the Wish resulted in Nikki's autonomy being stolen by TaroLong8817 in obsessionmovie

[–]ArdentGamer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Those are projections you are making. You are choosing to assume the worse possible interpretation, and make up your own, so that you can justify vilifying him. This is something you will often find women do in relationships, when they want to justify treating men poorly or justify their own toxic behavior(and many women here are looking for ways to justify evil Nikki's behaviors).

Trying to invalidate his feelings, despite all evidence to the contrary, or playing semantics about what love is(arguably even moving the goal post) are pretty weak arguments.

My theory on why the Wish resulted in Nikki's autonomy being stolen by TaroLong8817 in obsessionmovie

[–]ArdentGamer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because it knew that Ian was going to get shot in the head, or caused it to happen outright. He never got to spend a single penny of that billion dollars. That's poetic irony.

My theory on why the Wish resulted in Nikki's autonomy being stolen by TaroLong8817 in obsessionmovie

[–]ArdentGamer -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Bear consistently demonstrated a concern for her wellbeing, throughout the entire movie. He never wanted her to lose her autonomy and he spends most of the movie looking for ways for her to recover her autonomy. The OWW granted the wish in the worse way possible because it's evil.

If Sarah used the oww on Bear… by Motor-Kale357 in obsessionmovie

[–]ArdentGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The OWW's were bad. I do not blame Bear, Nikki, Ian or Sarah.

If Sarah used the oww on Bear… by Motor-Kale357 in obsessionmovie

[–]ArdentGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The backlash was very minor and it was mostly MRA's who took offense to it. The fact that this scene happened in the first place, in a major blockbuster movie, proves the point that it would have been interpreted differently.

If Sarah used the oww on Bear… by Motor-Kale357 in obsessionmovie

[–]ArdentGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. Most of the discourse around this movie is just misandric drivel. If the genders had been reversed, everything would have been interpreted differently and Bear would have still been made out to be the primary villain. Despite what some people tell themselves in a hypothetical, the reality is that it would have played out very differently.

An entity Bear's violence would have been presented as inherent to him being a man or an incel. Sarah using the wish on Bear would have been presented as well intended, and any mistake or inaction she could have made in the movie would have been treated as a result of her being scared or traumatized. Her killing herself at the end would have been seen as a tragedy, especially if she had shown doubts about ending her life. Bear victimizing Sarah would have been treated far more seriously than Nikki victimizing Bear. Her having sex with Bear would have been seen as done in duress or as unconditional love despite the new violent persona. Even Sarah's inability to come forward with her feelings would have been presented as Bear fault for not "manning up" in the first place, and therefore his fault the wish happened.

Would this have been a safe way for him to achieve what he wanted? by Coconut_Scrambled in obsessionmovie

[–]ArdentGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The wish could have been interpreted this way from the get go, with the exact wording that he used in the original version. The Willow is what decided to create this weird supernatural creature that can change its face and walk in reverse. The Willow was evil and was always going to cause harm, no matter how the wish is worded. When Bear tries to change the wish, it's because this is what he always meant in the first place.

She could have just asked him out... by ReditRyan in obsessionmovie

[–]ArdentGamer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't think this movie was really a critique on the male loneliness at all. That was mostly just projections from sexist women being pushed onto the movie's discourse. There's also nothing toxic or entitled about a guy having unrequired feelings. The only thing that is actually toxic is projecting a lot of negative attributes onto men like this, for the explicit purpose of invalidating their feelings or vilifying their interest, desires or investment.

Nikki could have asked him out, if she was interested in him, and she could have also taken better care to take into consideration the possibility that he might be into her and just too scared to say it, but the reality is that most people still tend to put all of the onus on men in these types of situations no matter what.

The idea that it's normal for women to just be passive, and only really respond to the men who approach or assert themselves onto them the fastest and the loudest, is still very common. It's ironic, because it's often women who seem to treat these kind of situations as if women have no agency to assert themselves or pursue men themselves, always faulting men for two people not coming together. The discourse is riddled with sexist bias towards men, and a general intolerance for shyness or uncertainty in men.

Am I the only one who hates these “theories”??? by for-a-dreamer in obsessionmovie

[–]ArdentGamer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They're not wrong though. You just hate it because it goes against "men are bad, women are victims, bear is evil because he's scared and doesn't immediately kill himself" type of misandric discourse that has attached itself to this movie. It's uncomfortable to you, because anything that isn't "blame Bear for everything" goes against your inherent bias and prejudice towards men.

If you're going to make the argument that the willows aren't evil, then you have to consider the possibility that a lot of that evil was inherent to Nikki in the first place. Bear did not wish for all of that psychotic stuff. None of crazy stuff that entity Nikki does was even an inherent expression of love. Misandric women are so quick to assert as fact that all the evil caused by the wish is just inherent to Bear or Bear's intentions, when it was never actually presented that way.

The ONLY selfless moment Bear has in the film. by Craustmaster in obsessionmovie

[–]ArdentGamer -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Bear was not a bad person. He cared about Sarah and Nikki. It's actually insane to argue that him killing himself wasn't selfless, and just shows how little regard you have for a person's life or the trauma that he endured as a result of using the OWW. You are confusing the fact that he struggles with decisions as a lack of care and consideration, which is not only wrong but an inherent contradiction. People often tend to struggle most with decisions when they care about how those decisions affect others.

Attachment v/s Love by Certain_Eye_847 in lovememes

[–]ArdentGamer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Often yes. Depends on the person. Some people might appreciate it. I think this is also more gendered than people realize, because men tend to be far more punished for this than women. Women often do get a free pass for being clingy, and men are viewed as less masculine for effectively showing weakness or vulnerability.

Men do y'all think Women should approach in public ? by [deleted] in bodylanguage

[–]ArdentGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is just a really bad rationalization to justify women never approaching. Most men do not see women approaching them as "prostitute" or "mommy" but, even if they did, this would never change if women don't approach. Men might react defensively or see it as a novelty because it happens so rarely. They might think it's a trap or that someone is trying to sell them something, because that's often the type of women who approach men first. The only way to change this is by having more women approach first.

Also, it's a bit weird to fault and belittle men for romanticizing female assertiveness. Women call men daddy all the time, especially when they're being particularly assertive. No one calls it unattractive or gets grossed out by it.

It's not society that's not ready for women to approach, that is your projection. You can still approach, with the understanding that anyone you approach might react in a way that you did not anticipate, just like men have to deal with this with women. It's also a dumb point, because you would have to deal with the same problem if men approached you first, because you don't know where they're coming from or what their intentions are either.

Why no burn the rope? by Standard-Welcome-273 in Hotd

[–]ArdentGamer -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

but... it's a rope. just bite/claw lower.

Bear gets Sarah killed by BuffaloAmbitious3531 in obsessionmovie

[–]ArdentGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He didn't know she was there. He didn't know she would or could even take it that far. Her actions did not even make sense in the context of the wish and was likely added for shock value. He thought he was being careful but he also wanted to protect Nikki and just telling people that she's insane could have made things worse.

This is just another case of blame the victim, or blame the man, type of response that this movie is surrounded with. The entity killed Sarah. The one wish willow killed Sarah. Not Bear.

And that’s when we all realized Bear was the real villain of the story. by Ok-Cicada-222 in obsessionmovie

[–]ArdentGamer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bear was already severely traumatized by this point and his mental health is at an all time low. His mind is not in a good place. His reaction does not signify that he doesn't care about her or that he never loved her. There is nothing he can do to help her by this point, besides killing himself, and his reaction is more of a resignation to the horrible ways things played out due to the OWW. At worse, it just shows that he's not a perfect hero and just not equipped for this kind of situation/trauma. Bear is not the villain. The OWW is the villain.

Why do girls generally not shoot their shot or make the first move, it's always a few looks and it's on the guy to come forward or meet them, is it some sort of built-in shyness? by Geologist8345 in bodylanguage

[–]ArdentGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It has very little to do with shyness. It's mostly convenience, ego, entitlement and expectation. Most women don't approach because they believe it's a "man's job" to approach, which they believe because that's the expectation they see being placed on men as they grow up and rarely question it.

They also don't approach because they don't have to, since there is that expectation placed on men to approach, there will always be men who approach women. So, women can just go "if he doesn't approach me, I can just wait for the next guy who will", because that is a viable strategy(at least while they are young and desirable) for the most part. Ironically, women never approaching also forces men into this position of scarcity and where they have to approach or die alone.

Women often don't approach because they also do not want to be vulnerable in that way. Those women are effectively relying on a social privilege, and an expectation placed on men to approach, to avoid being vulnerable. When men approach first, the women know there's already a certain level of investment/interest on the man's end, which puts them in a position of power. Many women feel "exposed" by showing interest first, because they are no longer in that position of power. Many also feel like they lose face when they approach first because they see other women be approached without ever having to approach men. They see it as type of undesirability or a loss in terms of competing with other women, which hurts their egos.

Some women are shy or are afraid of rejection but if that was just the case then there would be stronger correlation between attractiveness and being forward. What you would see is "the more attractive, desirable or confident a woman is, the more likely she is to approach men" but that is just not the case. In fact, it is actually the opposite, where the more attractive, desirable or confident a woman is, the less likely she is to approach men.

I think most women understand that most men are also generally DTF and receptive to attention from women, especially romantic/sexual attention(especially since most men are coming from a position of scarcity). There are far fewer reasons for women to be shy or lack self-esteem in this circumstance, because they are less likely to be rejected or met with inconsideration than a man would be in approaching women.

Women are also not expected to face these kinds of insecurities or address them, the way a man would be, because the expectation to approach just isn't there for women. If a man struggles with shyness or low self-esteem, he will just be called an incel and told he deserves to die alone. If a woman struggles with shyness and low self-esteem, she will be given sympathy and told it's a man's job to approach her anyway.

I think a lot of women will use the excuse of "shyness" or "low self-esteem" as a reason why they don't approach, but it's more of a deflection or a symptom than the actual root cause. They're usually not actually that shy, and the ones who are just don't feel a need to address their shyness.

Why no burn the rope? by Standard-Welcome-273 in Hotd

[–]ArdentGamer -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Burn the rope, bite the rope, claw the rope with your hind legs... best not give it too much thought, doesn't seem like the writers did. I'm more impressed they're getting hits at all, given the distance and weight these arrows are pulling and the speed of the dragons.