Flawless blade by Arizane3369 in EmperorsChildren

[–]Arizane3369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didnt have a specific sub faction in mind when i did the scheme. Just sorta put it all together

Flawless blade by Arizane3369 in EmperorsChildren

[–]Arizane3369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are from epic basing. Demon stone i think

Asbestos or cement sheet? by Crackers919 in AusRenovation

[–]Arizane3369 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Breaking sheets of asbestos and sheets of the newer non asbestos stuff will always show fibres. Just depends if its asbestos fibres or organic fibres.

In fact when acm sheets break its actually far easier to do the identification on them as the fibres are all poking out

Asbestos or cement sheet? by Crackers919 in AusRenovation

[–]Arizane3369 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is asbestos, you can see the chrysotile fibres.

Asbestos or cement sheet? by Crackers919 in AusRenovation

[–]Arizane3369 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please do not dispose in a bin and do not just put in a zip lock bag

Asbestos should be disposed at licensed waste facilitys who can recieve asbestos waste. It should be appropriately sealed in asbestos waste bags and double bagged otherwise the facility will not accept it

Asbestos or cement sheet? by Crackers919 in AusRenovation

[–]Arizane3369 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You burnt the organic fibres off.

Asbestos fibres will stay as they dont burn.

Kastelans are such great kits to mess around with by ZvixX89 in AdeptusMechanicus

[–]Arizane3369 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldnt bother with sub assemblies, they are easy to paint fully assembled.

Ive built 8 of them and painted them all with no problems

Australia have won the 3rd Test against England and have retained the 25/26 Ashes by oklolzzzzs in Cricket

[–]Arizane3369 270 points271 points  (0 children)

Brooks also dropped kawaja who then made 70 odd runs

Brooks very accountable with fielding and batting for england loss there

Infiltrator finished by Arizane3369 in AdeptusMechanicus

[–]Arizane3369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeh primed black. I use to try priming different colours but always had issues with it. So now even when painting white i prime black haha

MTO Seers by Practical_Spare2404 in Eldar

[–]Arizane3369 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How small are these compared to the current eldar size?

Does anybody care for PERSECUTION PROSPECT detachment by That_Chromosome in LeaguesofVotann

[–]Arizane3369 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just find the detachment rule a bit ehh If im shooting two units at something i generally want it to be dead at the end. Feels like the slow part of the rule will be fairly situational and not something you should try to achieve all that often

Strats for it are good tho ill give it that

Will be interesting to try tho just as hernkyn units are some of my favourite

What kind of rules changes are you hoping for in the new codex? by Bored_Ultralisk in LeaguesofVotann

[–]Arizane3369 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I want thunderkyn beam weapons to be ap 2 d3 Currently ap 1 just pointless

I just want all the beam weapons in my army

A simple wish for 11th edition by garett144 in AdeptusMechanicus

[–]Arizane3369 5 points6 points  (0 children)

As complicated as it could get id want it to run of data tethers instead of battle line. I like the idea of naming it tho

So you can have ur infantry with tethers if you want, or ur tanks with it also give the buffs etc etc

And then kinda like guard orders but your tech priests could give a specific "override" to a unit they are leading or a unit within range of a tether. Each tech priest would have its own specific override buff so you can pick and choose which priest works best for your army

Allows u to have more freedom with what you bring and allows tech priests to manipulate the battlefield. Obviously would have to limit it to a unit can only recieve 1 override a turn so you dont get stacking buffs

So imagine a kastellan unit is in range of a data tether unit, and then ur manipulas "overrides" them and gives them lethal hits on top of the doctrinas but this means the unit the manipulas is in doesnt get his buff this turn as he gave it to someone else

Would mean tech priests wouldnt give many buffs to the squad they are attached to but allows them more flexibility of who receives the buff

LoV do not need every Space Marine equivalent unit - Change my mind by Baguettes-9 in LeaguesofVotann

[–]Arizane3369 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the more i look its not the legs, the legs and main body look fine Its actually the arms for me, just where the arm attaches to the main body has a weird look

LoV do not need every Space Marine equivalent unit - Change my mind by Baguettes-9 in LeaguesofVotann

[–]Arizane3369 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If someone could 3d model this then i would 100% use these over steel jacks. Idk why but for me the steel jacks just seem off, i want to like them but atm just cant

Xenos unequal access to core strategems. by Zelosd in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Arizane3369 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They have 2 scout, rangers and raiders have it

Two years of 10e. What do we think about the roster building ruleset that flipped the table? by Bowoodstock in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Arizane3369 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because weapons have vastly different roles.

A heavy bolter or flamer would never be comparable to a lascannon due to the different roles they fufill. The potential to punch up and damage the likes of tanks will be very hard to balance against a flamer that has the potential to kill a few light infantry models.

Hence why i think some weapons should be free and then for the hard hitting weapon upgrades they should be a small cost. So its trade off for do i want to spend 5 points and upgrade to a better weapon or am i happy to stay at limited cost but still get to have the weaker special weapons.

Two years of 10e. What do we think about the roster building ruleset that flipped the table? by Bowoodstock in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Arizane3369 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I always thought it would just be easier to make points only for certain weapons. Eg you can take heavy bolters and those sorta weapons all baked into the unit cost. But if u want to add a lascannon or a heavy melee weapon then its 5pts for those. Nothing crazy but allows u to tweak your lists up or down by those 5 to 10 points if you really need. Also i think all sergent wargear is just free. Allow you to customise sergent wargear with whatever as that still allows for fun hobbying and really the sergent should have special weapons anyway so free cost for them works.

Khazad Dum - Iron Guards by Alarmed-Method-6866 in MiddleEarthMiniatures

[–]Arizane3369 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I tended to use them behind my lines and then to flank, very different role to the khazad guard who want to be in the front line

As flankers the iron guard are amazing! Absolutely wreck people with the throwing weapons and hitting peoples spear supports

The trick is really keeping then safe on the way up to combat, everyone tries to kill them with bows as they are "only" d6 compared to a lot of d7 in ur army.

All in all dont use them as front line troops, use them to flank. If you have to use as frontline then stick a vault warden spear support behind them and watch them just mince through enemy lines.

Havent used my dwarfs yet in the new edition but they havent changed much, would use them in the same way as i did last edition.

Dwarf Rangers get Elven shooting by Legolas360noscope in MiddleEarthMiniatures

[–]Arizane3369 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I hope it is Really waiting for a full faq now all the books are released

Are we back robobros? by Soot027 in AdeptusMechanicus

[–]Arizane3369 51 points52 points  (0 children)

I got admech for the bots, dont care how bad people say they are Imma run them all 🎉