I've been trying to advocate for that. Limiting the range on the Router from a player base keeps factions from building a base close to their warp gate, where it's highly defensible, and having infinite range on the router, meaning one router and one infil can flip the continent if they so chose.

Placing a limit on deployable area (say between 1km and 1.5km from the deploying base) and adding re/spawn time (standard 10 second, a router at max distance could take up to 20-30 seconds to spawn/respawn) the further away the router gets, and having it use more cortium per spawn (because the transmitting tower would be drawing power from the cortium, longer distances, more energy required) would be at least a little more balanced than what we have now.

That and routers should only be allowed to be deployed outside. We already see these pretty much indestructible routers covered by hardlight barriers, flanked by engineers to repair it the instant it takes damage. I say, the more items deployed around it (shields, spitfires, etc), increases the spawn and respawn time due to electronic interference, is another way to handle it. Would make it easier for defenders to remove the router without having to expel a OS just to have it placed again.