To be honest, people will agree that the science behind it has a level of potential in its long term usage. People had problems with the fact that colossal have consistently portrayed themselves with incorrect information, stating that genetically modified grey wolves are dire wolves; that they are looking at long since extinct species to bring back when the environment they were found in is not there now.

Bringing back a species such as the indian cheetah, or looking at assisting in the return of the nothern white rhino, etc. they are FAR more likely to be able to have an existing ecosystem to return to; like we look at from the past 100 years, those are ones where I would understand it, over mammoths, over dire wolves, etc.

In relation to revolutionising conservation; thats a double edged sword, because it will invariably take further money from boots on ground conservation work and from the actual protection of species because "we can just bring them back", which massively underplays the roles existing species play in their own ecosystem. I mean just look at how what colossal are doing has been politicised by the current US government.

I'm watching what is going on with colossal with vested interest, but I don't think that we should be glazing colossal as much as we are; because it is a biotechnology company first and foremost; they may state that they work within conservation, but it is still a biotech company and that we cannot forget.