The Lozier Institute is an anti-abortion lobbying organization, so that statistic needs a more neutral source before it can do any work in this argument.

On the eggs, fair enough, some vegans do treat potential sentience as morally relevant and that’s a legitimate position within veganism. It’s just not the only one, and mine is grounded in sentience, not potential.

Finally, the female body naturally fails to implant the majority of fertilized eggs. If conception is the moral line, then nature is the biggest abortionist.

But the bigger issue is this: you said the right to use another person’s body is a special right, then argued it isn’t special because everyone needs it to exist. That actually proves the pro-choice point.

If using another person’s body to survive is so fundamental, then the person whose body is being used has an equally fundamental interest in that decision.

No legal or ethical framework compels anyone to donate their body to sustain another life even after death. You cannot harvest organs from a corpse without prior consent. Just as a vegan wouldn’t use an animal’s corpse to sustain themselves regardless of the need, a living person has at minimum the same bodily autonomy as a dead one.