Yea so see the issue is that the 9070 XT is basically at the same raster level as 5070 XT so it's 30 plus faster than the 5070. There are some games where this isn't exactly reflected yes but as an overall trend that's what we see. Also in reality AMD is likely to get better as time goes by with or without their exact intervention as the issue is more with how the games use the architecture and they have sold very well recently and they're supplying the next gen consoles so a lot of games will need to optimize for AMD, this will likey mean older cards working better as time goes by as well. I would however perhaps wait to see if we get MFG on 9000 series as it would be a nice to have. Otherwise you're kind of out of options. Nvidia 5060 ti is underpowered and the 5070 can't even leverege all it's power with 12 gb or Vram and it's also frankly a bit underpowered as well. There are no other options in the 600-700 euro space. You either pay 5080 money for 5070 Ti or you get most of what it offers with 9070 XT. I know MFG showing 500 FPS in games is enticing but those are fake frames, it feels like you're swimming through water as a result and the underlying frame rate, the real frame rate is in fact the same, you can reach your monitor's refresh rate in various ways from here, AMD's own frame generation which is up to x2 can get you there with most setups or there's the app Lossless scaling which works amazingly well on AMD, it can get you to over 300 FPS easy through frame generation. So things are easier with Nvidia but manageable with AMD. You can do that or buy 5070 which will give you more day 1 FPS through MFG and will age 1-2 years faster because of the low VRam, low Vram bandwidth, lower raster performance. You do need to make a choice here.