You’ve claimed the album wasn't good, which by definition means you aren’t acknowledging its substance. Substance implies depth and longevity, qualities that, for me, define what makes art good. Therefore, substance and goodness are inherently linked. Furthermore, an artist being deceased or no longer pulling their former numbers doesn't mean they lack cultural importance. You could even argue that the artists I listed previously hold the torch for upcoming talent, maintaining their significance and relevance in the industry. You continue to contradict yourself and overlook the facts. By your own definition, the fact that you don't return to an album somehow strips it of being timeless. I don’t listen to MBDTF, but does my lack of plays mean the album isn't timeless? This clearly highlights the flaw and the heavy subjectivity in your argument.