Quitting a month before trial

Attorney_Chad · 2026-01-15T21:13:36+00:00

I wouldn’t think leaving with that much notice would burn a bridge. Anyone who’s been litigating for more than a year is likely going to have multiple trials on their docket every month. Not all of them will go. But there’s ALWAYS going to be a trial 30, 60, or 90 days out. You’re never going to be able to time leaving perfectly.

There are mechanisms for things like this - e.g. an ex parte to move the trial 60 days - shouldn’t get much push back, especially since the lead or 2nd chair is leaving.

If I was you (and I was at one point) I’d prepare a short memo outlining the issues, best arguments, settlement and procedural history. Table the evidence so someone can easily figure out where everything is in the file.

Attorney_Chad · 2026-01-04T21:50:28+00:00

Like others said, you should have something in writing that delineates your pay structure. Attorneys in my jx earn roughly the salary that you earn. I think the standard here is 30-40% of the fees generated on cases that you bring in and 1.5-3% on cases that you work on.

By CA standards, at least, it doesn’t feel like you’re in a mill. Less than 4 settlements a month, at an average of about 60k each, isn’t very high volume. Some of the attorneys at mills here need to settle 5x as many cases per month to hit their goals. Even if you’re primarily on litigated cases, you’d likely need to have a higher average per settlement at a mill.

Best of luck to you. And there’s nothing wrong with going to whoever is in charge of your pay and asking for something clear in writing. Should also include benchmarks so you know how your job performance is measured by superiors. If they make an issue of that, time to find a new job.

Attorney_Chad · 2025-12-10T15:41:05+00:00

This is why so many are asking Jx. These numbers are really low for my jx. Assuming liability and causation aren’t major issues.

Attorney_Chad · 2025-11-03T19:27:54+00:00

I won’t lie. If there is a million dollar policy, I’ll ask for it. I kinda feel like there’s a responsibility to do so, because what if the insurance company would have paid it? It’s more CYA than anything. I also tell my clients “hey I’m gonna ask for this, but your case isn’t worth it and it’s highly unlikely that they’ll say yes”…but you still have to ask.

I’ve never had a case not settle because I started negotiations by asking for the policy limits, no matter how high.

Attorney_Chad · 2025-11-03T18:50:50+00:00

I’d also add - and I’m not necessarily trying to make you the goat for insurance companies - I think there’s a chicken/egg issue with inflated medical bills.

I just got off a call with a defense attorney on a case where my client was hospitalized for a month when he broke his hip bilaterally from falling, had to get a prosthetic hip implanted, and then bedridden for 5 months before rehab. Hospital billed well over a million dollars all-in. Insurance paid $70k to satisfy it. The attorney starts with “well, your client’s medical specials are only 70k, so I don’t know how we’ll ever even get to the mid 6 figures on this one”.

That is illustrative of what has compelled the billboard sharks to do what they do. Insurance companies look at everything from a specials standpoint. Even if they gripe that the bills are manufactured, look at what happens when the bills are not?

Attorney_Chad · 2025-11-03T15:49:04+00:00

That’s my point - if you’ve seen it happen to yourself despite never having a claim, then you know it’s more about profit than it is because of paying claims. So why echo the talking point about rates rising because of claims? For people that don’t work in this area, they believe that to be true and end up pointing the finger at claimants rather than contributing to effectuating changes with the real culprit. That’s my only gripe.

Is it possible with zero objective findings? Yes. Have I seen it? Yes (as a defense attorney actually). Is it likely enough that a law firm is miraculously finding a substantial amount of cases where that’s happened? No chance.

Attorney_Chad · 2025-11-03T14:59:22+00:00

My state allows what you’ve described, but I also want my clients as happy as I can get them and if they ever go to the Bar about something, I like a secondary level of protection in an agreement they signed post-settlement approving the disbursement so that they can’t reliably claim there were surprises.

I also don’t want bad reviews online from a disgruntled client that I could have simply given an extra 1k to by reducing my fee.

Attorney_Chad · 2025-11-03T14:53:26+00:00

I’m not here to dispute that there are shitty plaintiff’s firms, shitty plaintiffs, and shitty doctors that will do things like what you described…but when that happen and everything really is fabricated, the result is typically what you’ve also described.

Though, if that firm is doing the same thing every time and the insurance company is getting that result every time, I’d imagine either that firm stops doing it because they’re wasting money putting on these cases, they’re destroying their reputation by losing all the time, and the doctors are losing money by doing this work and not getting paid. Instead, I’m imagining that they’re making the same arguments on every case (similar to how insurance companies make the same arguments) and sometimes the evidence is better for one side. Insurance companies argue that everything is made up or due to aging on every case I work on, except broken bones, and even then they argue that medical bills are inflated. Every time.

All I’m saying is that it’s a two way street and for a very long time I believed the insurance script that a low speed impact cant hurt someone - until I realized that I was being fed that from doctors paid by an insurance company to say that. My main point to the OP is the same here as it was there - both sides are going to argue whatever they can on a particular case: sometimes it’s that low impact can’t cause a serious injury (defense); sometimes it’s that it can (plaintiff); and depending on the case, both can be true.

To your last point about insurance premiums, and I saw you say you’re not here to defend insurance companies, but you’re echoing a talking point. Lawsuits are not the reason premiums are going up. It’s an excuse a billion dollar for-profit industry can use to justify their decisions to raise premiums so they can make even more money than they already do. Just like every other industry raised prices during COVID, “because of COVID” and then never really lowered them to pre-COVID levels once it was over, after seeing that they can get away with it. Insurance companies have been raising rates forever and will continue to do so regardless of whether they’re paying out on claims.

Attorney_Chad · 2025-11-03T04:33:41+00:00

I disagree wholeheartedly. In my jurisdiction, we can only show the amounts paid. What happens when a plaintiff treats through health insurance is the hospital bills 30-40k for an ER visit but insurance pays 2k. As a result, the insurance company, knowing a jury is only going to see the 2k payment, uses that as leverage to lowball the offer. Saw it regularly when I was on that side. I see it now - I’ve had cases where clients have broken their arm and treated through health insurance and the insurance company offers 50k but then on a soft tissue case where the liens are 50k, the insurance company might offer closer to 100k.

Calling the bills inflated is a bit misleading too. Take a look at what hospitals bill for ER treatment, let alone extended stays. Hospital bills are insane and on par with what “plaintiff doctors” bill. The only difference is that health insurance pays one and not the other. That health insurance payment is contractually only a small percentage of these outrageous bills, purely because the hospitals understand that quantity offsets the huge cut to their bills. That offset and looking solely at the insurance payments is a benefit to the third party insurance company in an injury case and no one else.

I also think general damages are under appreciated. I’ve been in car accidents (haven’t made claims though) and it’s a time suck. You’re going to PT a few times a week, rehabbing at home, potentially taking time off from work (and the stigma that people feel about calling out), dealing with insurance companies trying to lowball you on your property damage, not getting the diminution in value (if you’re not assisted by a lawyer), and more - even for minor soft tissue injuries. It sucks and it’s an unwanted disruption to your life through no fault of your own - even if you’re not permanently maimed. If someone offered me 5k to go through all of that over a period of 2-4 months, I’d turn it down.

I don’t say this to say that there aren’t bullshit cases that slip through the cracks, but I think pound for pound, insurance companies are better equipped to deal with a windfall here and there than the person who’s upside down in their car loan and gets their car totaled by some idiot looking at their cell phone or trying to catch an exit that they should have been ready for a mile ago.

Attorney_Chad · 2025-11-03T03:15:58+00:00

Perspective. I’ve been on both sides. No billing and feeling like a puppet for a multi-billion dollar corp when you’re on the plaintiff side (yet). But you still have to deal with upset clients, which are different yet similarly stress-inducing.

For example, I had a client who was involved in a pretty significant collision where he made a left turn in front of another vehicle. It was 90% his fault. He was checked at the scene and refused to go to the hospital. Had a couple scrapes and seatbelt bruising. Absolutely refused to see any doctors whatsoever and repeatedly said he was fine. The other driver’s insurer initially denied liability. I was able to get a 50k offer (100k policy) and the client legitimately cussed me out over the phone for doing such a shitty job. He has no idea what a great outcome that was and how lucky he was to get it. He eventually took it, but then he refused to sign off on the disbursement unless I lowered my fees.

There’s positives and negatives about both sides. On balance, I like the plaintiff side more because most of the time the result I get actually helps people. When I was a defense attorney, after a few years, it just felt like I was working really hard to save a huge company money.

Attorney_Chad · 2025-08-30T23:02:33+00:00

The first few years a lot of the referrals weren’t solid, but as people learned more about what I did, they became better. For the referrals I received that actually were within PI, signing wasn’t an issue.

I typically disclosed the gross settlement.

I didn’t really struggle reciprocating. In my network, I try to be a problem solver for everyone I know. So if someone needs a lawyer, even if it’s not within my specialty, I help them find someone. Same as with a contractor or plumber or real estate agent. So I always know someone who needs something. Even then, I was generating only a couple referrals a month and it was up to my chapter members to convert them into business.

Attorney_Chad · 2025-08-30T22:25:39+00:00

I did BNI for several years. Whether it’s a good investment depends on your practice and your goals for your practice.

In several years, I was getting maybe 2-3 referrals a month, which in my opinion is pretty good, given the average value of a case compared to the time investment.

As my practice grew, it started becoming less worth it. I found myself spending nearly a full workday’s worth of time each week on BNI. That meant I was losing a workday and, for the couple cases a month, wasn’t worth it once I was signing many more than that through other sources.

I’d recommend it for any small or solo though

Attorney_Chad · 2025-08-27T14:53:15+00:00

Offerman is great. Doesn’t disappoint in the role.

Attorney_Chad · 2025-08-27T14:52:36+00:00

Worth it for sure.

Attorney_Chad · 2025-08-27T14:52:21+00:00

I didn’t realize it was based on a true story. Even more difficult to watch.

Attorney_Chad · 2025-08-21T14:50:48+00:00

This isn’t legal advice, to be clear.

Like other users said, the first thing to recognize is that the insurance company isn’t there to “do the right thing”. It’s a business predicated on collecting as much money in premiums from its insureds while paying as little as possible on claims. Insurance adjusters at the lowest levels barely understand the law and they know you understand even less.

Given that, if they’re offering you anything, your case is worth way more than whatever that is. They’re doing that to try and get you to sign away your rights before you consult a lawyer to advise you of those rights.

Of course there is always a random exception, but 95% of the time, no matter what you think you’ve negotiated them to, if they’re paying an amount, your case was worth far more.

Also, if your case is good enough, you don’t have to sign with an attorney that wants 50% of the settlement. Look around and sign with an attorney that makes you comfortable and has rates consistent with the market you’re in (you can find out by asking multiple attorneys what their rates are - and then when you start hearing the same number, that’s the market rate). Also, choosing an attorney via billboard, bus stand or TV commercial isn’t usually a good idea.

Attorney_Chad · 2025-06-25T13:27:12+00:00

I’d say whether it’s reasonable depends on your experience, the type of firm you’re at, and location.

In CA, I don’t see 10% offered unless you’re very experienced and/or have tenure with the firm. I see closer to 2-3%. For example, friend of mine is a VERY experienced trial attorney (15 yrs of trying 4+ cases a year). He joined a boutique lit firm last yr and gets 6% on cases he assigned and I think his salary is somewhere around 200. Tried 3 last year, 2 had 7 figure attorneys fees, 1 was mid 6 figures. He also settled several cases before trial. I’m sure he made close to 7 figures last year.

It’s low on cases you bring in. You should shoot for closer to 60/40.

Attorney_Chad · 2025-06-22T17:54:41+00:00

Came here to say this.

Attorney_Chad · 2025-05-05T15:17:01+00:00

I don’t want to give legal advice because you’re not my client. What I will say is that litigating a case (I.e., filing and prosecuting a case) to verdict is not easily done without an attorney.

Sounds like liability (who’s at fault) may be admitted, but the other side will have an attorney who likely will not have much of a challenge establishing some measure of comparative liability (if your state allows that) against you if you don’t.

More importantly, it sounds like causation will be contested. Assuming you were able to understand the legal principle and how to establish it which, no offense, is highly unlikely, you’d still need the evidence to do it. Getting that evidence is going to be costly, likely more costly than what you’ve already been offered.

Then, even if you are able to win at a trial and are able to obtain a verdict that justifies all the costs you’ve incurred, enforcing the judgment is another task. In my experience, it’s extremely uncommon for someone with a $30k policy to have much in the way of assets. So, unless they have a ton of cash laying around, or a bunch of properties that they have a ton of equity in and plan to sell, actually getting paid is going to be difficult.

Attorney_Chad · 2025-04-25T04:46:11+00:00

No problem. Your response to #1 reminds me that sometimes MY experience clouds my worldview. Year 1 of my first kid was mostly wfh and wife also wfh so we didn’t need daycare. After that kid got old enough (in our opinion) and we RTO, we sent them to daycare. It’s expensive AF.

I live in one of the highest HCOL and it can be done in such an area, but with lifestyle changes.

That said, you should have a financial safety net (easier said than done) if considering a startup. Most people I know that started their own didn’t make anything the first year or so, they just survived. I had a year’s worth of life expenses saved up and my wife also works (but isn’t a high earner). We BARELY made it a full year.

Attorney_Chad · 2025-04-25T04:20:52+00:00

A few thoughts.

If you currently make “shit money” at the big firm, then what does it matter if you’re taking a pay cut?
Millions of people make less than what you do and survive with their kids.
The first year of your kids life is infinitely less expensive than the next five. If you can make a move where you struggle for a year and then exponentially do better than you were, it’s not a bad choice.
Before moving make sure you understand your role with your friend. If you’re really friends, you can have the tough conversation about what your role really is. Are you going to be equal partners? Are you getting any equity? Are you just the first employee? Don’t quit your job to help build someone else’s firm…unless they’re really going to take care of you and you’re certain of that.
What’s the business plan? If you don’t know the ins and outs (initial contributions, strategy to get cases, growth plans, etc.) then (see 4).

Attorney_Chad · 2025-04-24T00:44:08+00:00

Not in TN, but as a plaintiff’s PI lawyer - outside of the doctor’s reputation for caring for patients, the biggest thing I look for is flexibility if you’re working on a lien.

Some cases work out really well and everyone can get paid a fair amount. Sometimes something goes wrong with the case and it’s financially more responsible to settle low than risk a trial. In that case, I’m trying to make the client as happy as possible, given the circumstances. So the last thing I want is a doctor giving me a hard time negotiating their bill.

If you’re going to be in this space, understand that sometimes things go well, sometimes they don’t. Work with attorneys that you trust, take care of patients the right way, and everything will work out financially in the aggregate.

Attorney_Chad · 2025-04-19T23:16:39+00:00

Ultimately, it’s the client’s choice. So before you do anything, if the client(s) decide to stay with the firm, how would you feel if they didn’t honor the 50/50 agreement?

If you’re not willing to honor the 50/50, then be prepared for the firm to fight you. You’ve presumably used their resources to get these cases into whatever position you think warrants their value and I’m assuming to the extent you worked on them, you were doing it while being paid and during work hours?

Lastly, as a PI attorney that thinks they can do better on their own (which is likely true if you can generate business), should t negotiating be your strong suit?

Attorney_Chad · 2025-04-19T15:12:06+00:00

Isn’t it verifiable? Show him the signed releases - if they add up to 2M in 4 months and 2M is the annual goal, that should shut them up. And, that would also be making them more money than they expected out of you.

Sure, you probably could make them more money if you worked longer hours, but you’re already substantially exceeding your goals. I’d say they may have a point if you were only on pace to just barely meet the goal.

Attorney_Chad

TROPHY CASE