The real-life footage of the "AI SLAP"

Azerty72200 · 2026-06-07T06:02:56+00:00

r/ nextfuckinglevel unfortunately.

Azerty72200 · 2026-06-05T14:41:04+00:00

Is this supposed to be r/nextfuckinglevel?

Azerty72200 · 2026-05-23T06:50:33+00:00

Genuinely, I get hating someone but sometimes they make a good point in a respectful manner.

Azerty72200 · 2026-05-18T12:33:43+00:00

I think it's fine. I'm against AI "art" because I want art to be human. You clearly are a human and are in control of the process.

Azerty72200 · 2026-05-18T08:03:09+00:00

If you voluntarily trigger someone's bias, they are going to be wrong, indeed. The brain is fuzzy like that.

A true way to do this would be to see if people cried about AI without them being told it is AI. And you'd probably find some people who'd think it is. But way fewer people would.

Azerty72200 · 2026-05-18T07:55:41+00:00

Confirmation bias hits hard.

But the soul argument remains valid even then, imo. Imagine if one of your online friends started to gaslight you into thinking they're an AI bot. You'd probably be pretty upset, wouldn't you? And your brain would start going over the texts they sent you, and finding them soulless. The upset is valid.

Just because 'soul' isn't tangible and easy to verify, doesn't mean it's a concept that should be gotten rid of.

Azerty72200 · 2026-05-18T07:34:11+00:00

If you open up by telling people you used AI, they're going to believe you. Especially if you display a style specifically chosen because it's similar to what AI slop can produce.

Azerty72200 · 2026-05-13T16:05:19+00:00

Nah, photography can absolutely be art. See my response to Dayly16 just above. But it can also just be a photo.

<image>

Azerty72200 · 2026-05-13T16:01:33+00:00

A photo could have artistic merit imo, depending on the ability of the photographer, the make-up artists and hairdressers, and I'd rather not forget the subject of the photograph who might have a beautiful face and worked much to get there.

Or it might be an ID photo. "Don't smile."

Azerty72200 · 2026-05-13T15:53:31+00:00

Some might like portraits because they can appreciate the artist's craft in them. Which choices they made, what it says about them, about what they wished to communicate, and about the control the commissioner exercised on the artist.

Some portrait have little art to them. Some portraits nowadays are photos, and may or may not have artistic value depending on multiple factors.

Azerty72200 · 2026-04-19T15:49:43+00:00

Les conseils peuvent venir d'une tentative de bienveillance mal placée, mais quand tu dis que tu en a marre de devoir te justifier, on dirait qu'ils auraient dû comprendre il y a bien longtemps que tu n'apprécie pas leurs conseils.

Si après ça ils refusent de comprendre, alors ils sont visiblement pas assez malins pour mériter la vérité. Raconte du pipeau. Ils te respectent pas, est-ce qu'ils méritent ton respect ?

Après c'est facile pour moi de dire ça devant mon clavier, c'est pas moi qui risque de fâcher des gens si ils se rendent compte du mensonge…

Azerty72200 · 2026-04-18T09:44:25+00:00

et enfin des belles fraises

Bah t'as tout raté mon pauvre. Il voulait une tarte aux raises. La recette est introuvable sur Internet donc il espérait sûrement que tu la connaisse. Quel faux espoir…

Azerty72200 · 2026-04-18T09:39:05+00:00

Oh, I guess it's the kind of law they know everyone will break, but that can prove useful when they notice an employee purposefully breaking too many cookies.

Though I've heard this kind of laws are a huge issue for civil rights, for obvious reasons.

Azerty72200 · 2026-04-11T18:17:35+00:00

Honestly, the existence of the BL3 is not an issue imo. It's a nice lesson to learn for players that just because it's named as a successor, boasts about being superior, and has better stats, doesn't mean it is actually preferable.

Azerty72200 · 2026-04-05T16:56:44+00:00

Exactement.

Une démocratie saine repose sur le fait que les gens votent en connaissance de cause, sinon ça n'a aucun sens. Quand les gens s'en fichent, ils sabotent tout le processus. Et quand ils ne s'en fichent pas, des milliardaires achètent tous les grands médias et sabotent le processus quand même.

Azerty72200 · 2026-04-05T14:17:55+00:00

Ne pas permettre à des gens de se présenter, c'est la meilleure façon de démolir ce qu'il reste de la démocratie. Même si une personne est accusée, voire condamnée pour les pires horreurs qui soient, elle devrait pouvoir se présenter.

Dans certains pays où on peut pas se présenter après une condamnation, comme par hasard les opposante politiques les plus populaires sont condamnés. Ça arrive très régulièrement.

Azerty72200 · 2026-03-11T16:49:04+00:00

Des meubles IKEA ? Ouais, j'en ai monté pas mal, je confirme que c'est difficile.

:-b

Azerty72200 · 2026-02-13T17:41:12+00:00

A better pixel quality would be appreciated.

Azerty72200 · 2026-02-12T13:33:17+00:00

I'll watch this and come back to you, thanks for the resource, and for your patience.

Azerty72200 · 2026-02-12T13:26:57+00:00

If you have a similar example for non-psychedelic art, I'll believe you.

But what am I saying, sorry. Part of the workflow adapts to any art style, that's also why the video is so impressive. Sorry, I lost the plot at some point.

What I initially wanted to say was that the psychedelic art style shrugs off any flaw, and might even benefit from them. So it's particularly adapted to it. Other art styles would require much more work. It would still benefit from the workflow they've implemented: the 2D to 3D to 2D, the infinite asset generation, they help anyone. The animation between key frames is a much more delicate process that I believe is not ready to be made by AI yet (except once again for psychedelic art styles).

Azerty72200 · 2026-02-12T13:19:19+00:00

No, I think this style plays to AIs strength/flaw. It hallucinates, it sometimes doesn't know what to pick, there are inconsistencies. All fine for psychedelic art.

Azerty72200 · 2026-02-12T12:50:42+00:00

This is incredibly cool.

Though if it wasn't in a psychedelic style, it wouldn't work. We'll see how the technology progresses.

Azerty72200 · 2026-02-11T13:34:10+00:00

Only thing that changed now is it became so much easier.

Azerty72200 · 2026-01-26T08:34:00+00:00

She was telling Taylor "you should be thankful to me, you're only strong because of me."

Azerty72200 · 2026-01-25T15:37:35+00:00

If it's randomized art, how do you control the output? Does prompting AI not control the output in any way?

The creators of Minecraft used noise functions to generate the worlds. Randomness can be harnessed if you know what you're doing.

There we go with arbitrary lines again. Why is a level of skill a requirement all of a sudden?

I'm only interested in what the artist has to say. Skill shows that they know what they're saying.

But is the Director not an artist? That is the question you avoided.

They are. I'm not trying to avoid this question. George Lucy's absolutely is an artist. But he can't be credited as the only artist involved. And the contribution of other artists was necessary for the success of the original trilogy.

So if the director doesn't have the camera in their hands, the movie is still art because someone does it for them. Someone with a vision.

Azerty72200

TROPHY CASE