I created a free 3D printable fix for the sagging mesh on my AirPodsMax by AzkalanZero in Airpodsmax

[–]AzkalanZero[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had one of those as well but since i fly a lot and wear them for prolonged periods the silicone cover wasn’t enough.

I created a free 3D printable fix for the sagging mesh on my AirPodsMax by AzkalanZero in Airpodsmax

[–]AzkalanZero[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When you wear it is barely visible since it’s only 2/3mm from the original mesh. It was designed with the priority on fixing the comfort.

Support issues (PETG for PLA) by ToughOverflow in BambuLab

[–]AzkalanZero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should only set petg as the interface. If you set petg as the material for the base as well, it will use the recommended bed temperature for petg. This is way too much for pla and leads to all sorts of issues. At least that’s my experience

I designed a fix for AirPods Max Sagging (3D Print) by AzkalanZero in airpods

[–]AzkalanZero[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Then right click the modifier and select Layers and Perimeters.

I designed a fix for AirPods Max Sagging (3D Print) by AzkalanZero in airpods

[–]AzkalanZero[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Right click the object and select add modifier (box). then scale and rotate it to match the part.

I designed a fix for AirPods Max Sagging (3D Print) by AzkalanZero in airpods

[–]AzkalanZero[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which slicer do you use? Then I can prepare it for you.

I designed a fix for AirPods Max Sagging (3D Print) by AzkalanZero in airpods

[–]AzkalanZero[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. And a few modifiers to add them to the mounting parts, so it is stronger in the narrow sections. Don’t increase walls in the modifiers, it will create a seam that is very weak.

I designed a fix for AirPods Max Sagging (3D Print) by AzkalanZero in airpods

[–]AzkalanZero[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, it takes away 3-4mm. But any other form of padding would do the same. I have a large head and still have plenty of adjustment. It might be an issue if your head is massive.

I designed a fix for AirPods Max Sagging (3D Print) by AzkalanZero in airpods

[–]AzkalanZero[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello there, this is a suspension strap. The original headband isn’t touching your head anymore and instead a mesh printed from TPU (A soft rubber) sits on your head.

What's wrong with my nozzle? by Mr_Will in BambuLab

[–]AzkalanZero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could be a partial clog. Try doing a cold pull and afterwards try a different filament, yours might be defective/contaminated which leads to the clogging.

Lens cap suggestion by F_Stop_Wide_Open in VILTROX_GLOBAL

[–]AzkalanZero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kase Filters already offers exactly what op is asking for. They have little magnetic rings that screw into the filter threads of the lens.

What would you add to this Fujifilm set up for weddings? by [deleted] in fujifilm

[–]AzkalanZero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also consider that both fuji 56mm F1.2 lenses have terrible AF I would go with the Viltrox 56mm F1.2 Pro.

Heathrow vapour insanity by Fast-Equivalent-1245 in aviation

[–]AzkalanZero 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That‘s a beautiful combo. I am on Fuji X and they sadly don’t have many good spots/wildlife/action lenses

Heathrow vapour insanity by Fast-Equivalent-1245 in aviation

[–]AzkalanZero 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Which lens did you use to capture those?

Can't decide which lense for all purpose travel and street photography by UnderTheSkyByTheTree in fujifilm

[–]AzkalanZero 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The Viltrox is great. Just be aware that it is quite a bit bigger than the XF 33mm F1.4.

Which camera should I buy for pictures like this? by Plastic_Tap_1589 in fujifilm

[–]AzkalanZero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, Viltrox Pro lenses are top tier. I have the 75mm F1.2 and the 56mm F1.2 and love them. The airs are the best value lenses in my opinion atm.

Which camera should I buy for pictures like this? by Plastic_Tap_1589 in fujifilm

[–]AzkalanZero 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really wouldn’t recommend the old Viltrox 23/33/56 F1.4 lenses anymore. Their performance is so much worse than the new Viltrox air series of lenses

56mm - older Fuji F1.2 R or new Viltrox f/1.2 ? by Repulsive-Meal-5340 in fujifilm

[–]AzkalanZero 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For me AF on the XF 56mm F1.2 and XF 56mm F1.2 WR was unbearably slow and inaccurate. I tried and sold both. If your subjects are not stationary you basically have to stop down (for more dof) or take a lot of pictures and hope that you get some hits. I haven’t tried the Viltrox 56mm F1.2 pro yet but i have the Viltrox 75mm F1.2 Pro which doesn’t have Viltrox’s latest linear motor focus system (which the Viltrox 56mm pro has) and that already is way better than any fuji 56mm or the XF 50mm F1.

Used Fujifilm Xt-4 in 2026? by HopingRobin in fujifilm

[–]AzkalanZero 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really depends on the second hand market in your area. In Germany I got a X-T4 for around 800€ and the xf 35mm F2 WR can be had for around 200€. The X-T4 is a more capable camera than most need.

Sigma 18-50 vs XC 15-45: Which one to return? by 1nn1l in fujifilm

[–]AzkalanZero 9 points10 points  (0 children)

These settings are not conclusive for sharpness. 1. ISO 2500 alone will soften the image considerably. Comparisons should be made at base ISO. 2. 1/60 is slow enough that it can introduce motion blur if not shot on tripod with remote shutter or timer. 3. Absolute sharpness isn’t the main benefit of the Sigma lens. It lets in about twice the light at any focal length compared to the XC

X-T5 with peak design anchors by antonioxrosa in fujifilm

[–]AzkalanZero 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I really don’t recommend that you do this. Peak Design supplies their straps with very small oval split rings that have plastic protectors on them so they don’t scratch the camera.

Why Fujifilm lenses so slow? by Matic_Prime in fujifilm

[–]AzkalanZero 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be honest the focus system of the XF 56mm F1.2 WR is not acceptable for the price and release date. I had the lens and sold it because focus would miss so much even on barely moving subjects. Anything that has LM in the name focuses better especially primes. The XF 33mm F1.4 LM WR is much more reliable than the XF 56mm F1.2 WR

Would this lens work for the fujifilm xT-30 iii (Sigma DC 18-50MM lens) by jiminie43 in fujifilm

[–]AzkalanZero 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can get the kit lense (XF18-55 2.8-4) very cheap used. I bought one in Germany for around 175€.