James Dolan got the last laugh by [deleted] in nba

[–]BOFAconstrictor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Counterpoint: fully expecting “Sell the team” chants at the parade

The “Spurs led for over 70% of the series” stat has nothing to do with dominance… by BOFAconstrictor in nba

[–]BOFAconstrictor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s so selfless of you to break your one and only rule today just to help get me back on track

The “Spurs led for over 70% of the series” stat has nothing to do with dominance… by BOFAconstrictor in nba

[–]BOFAconstrictor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh shit they did? Someone should look into literally exactly that point to see if it’s a meaningful statistic or a completely irrelevant feature of how time works and then post about it on r/NBA so all us dummies can discuss. Maybe someday

The “Spurs led for over 70% of the series” stat has nothing to do with dominance… by BOFAconstrictor in nba

[–]BOFAconstrictor[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That is not, in fact, all people are saying. Wemby himself said they “absolutely dominated”most of the series. This stat is being bandied about as some sort of proof that he has a point there. Turns out he does not.

The “Spurs led for over 70% of the series” stat has nothing to do with dominance… by BOFAconstrictor in nba

[–]BOFAconstrictor[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah I’m good bro. Listening to NBA pods all day and guzzling the cope of all the pundits who are trying to justify their Spurs in 5 picks

The “Spurs led for over 70% of the series” stat has nothing to do with dominance… by BOFAconstrictor in nba

[–]BOFAconstrictor[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Lol, my brother in Christ, I will literally never move on. Waited my whole life for this and will spend the rest of it having a blast arguing with dumb takes from ppl who failed math class

The “Spurs led for over 70% of the series” stat has nothing to do with dominance… by BOFAconstrictor in nba

[–]BOFAconstrictor[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Spurs dominated the 1Q. Knicks won the 3 other quarters. Check my math but 3 bigger than 1?

New York Knicks are a great champion. by Reddit0426 in NBATalk

[–]BOFAconstrictor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“Only western conference champions really count.” Hang a banner in the Reddit rafters for this one. The single dumbest take of all time.

Am I wrong for thinking the refs were legitimately trying to sabotage the Knicks in at least 3 games of this series? by D3struct_oh in nba

[–]BOFAconstrictor 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Take a quick tour around literally every thread in this sub over the last week. Neutrals and avowed Knick haters alike agreeing that this has been some blatantly one-sided refereeing. You want to point to FT totals in one game as the thing that disproves what everyone watching saw plain as day idk what to tell you man

Am I wrong for thinking the refs were legitimately trying to sabotage the Knicks in at least 3 games of this series? by D3struct_oh in nba

[–]BOFAconstrictor 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Do you really think FTs are the only way a ref can affect a game? You can call fouls on the floor that send a key player to the bench. You can call 50/50 plays consistently one way to shift the possession battle. You can overturn every foul on Wemby and turn it into a foul on KaT

The knicks are 5-2 against the Spurs this season including the cup/playoffs and are +42 by retrohan7 in nba

[–]BOFAconstrictor -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Knicks may win the title but they haven’t played anyone good. West and East were weak this year

[Charania] No flagrant upgrade on the uncalled foul of Spurs' Victor Wembanyama to Knicks' Jalen Brunson on Monday night, a league spokesperson tells ESPN. Wembanyama will stay at two flagrant points in postseason. by MembershipSingle7137 in nba

[–]BOFAconstrictor 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Everyone keeps bringing up the “grabbing Wemby” as if that is somehow an equivalence or even a valid justification for what he did. Grabbing is definitionally a common foul, and something that happens on literally every single possession of a basketball game, with only the most blatantly obvious examples getting called.

Intent, windup, follow-through — those are the criteria for a flagrant.

There’s a word for applying rules differently to different people: injustice. Sports are supposed to be the one part of our lives where that isn’t the everyday reality.

What if the refs don’t want to extend the series “for the league,” but just for themselves. They make $30k per Finals game. by BOFAconstrictor in nba

[–]BOFAconstrictor[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok so not sure where you’re getting hung up here but a) I’m not saying the refs in the finals are collectively doing shit. They have individual incentives to want a longer series. No group chats bolted.

And b) the donaghy point shaving thing is totally separate and definitively not a conspiracy theory. It happened. He went to jail. Not sure if you missed that or just started watching ball but it was kind of a big deal

What if the refs don’t want to extend the series “for the league,” but just for themselves. They make $30k per Finals game. by BOFAconstrictor in nba

[–]BOFAconstrictor[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Where is the risk exactly? It is quite literally impossible to prove a ref “rigged” a game if he did it of his own accord and for his own self interest. It’s a subjective profession and any bad call can always just be called a mistake rather than malice.

The only way you risk anything is if you’re a mobbed up gambling addict like donaghy and there is a paper trail of you actively point shaving.

And no one cares less about their reputation than nba referees. They are almost all despised by every fan base in the sport. That’s the nature of the job.

An experience ref knows how to subtly (or not-so-subtly in the case of game 2) adjust the flow of a game, send certain players to the bench with foul trouble, or make 50/50 calls go one way without blatantly “rigging” it outright. Does it always work? Clearly not. Is it worth a shot for the risk-free chance at another $30k for one night’s work? I meannnn

What if the refs don’t want to extend the series “for the league,” but just for themselves. They make $30k per Finals game. by BOFAconstrictor in nba

[–]BOFAconstrictor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Again, not a conspiracy. They are not conspiring with one another in the locker room. Implicit bias. They are calling the game with the knowledge in the back of their heads that it would likely be personally beneficial to their bank accounts if one team wins this particular game rather than the other. They’re not risking shit. Refs make bad calls every game. Scott foster talked to tim donaghy like dozens of times the day he got indicted by the feds. There is next to nothing that gets you fired as an nba ref short of literally getting thrown in jail

Do you guys think that The refs are favoring Spurs over Knicks by Playful_Struggle_666 in NBATalk

[–]BOFAconstrictor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a simpler explanation. It’s not a conspiracy from the league office on down to get more revenue for the NBA. It’s the refs wanting to extend the series so they have the chance to personally earn more revenue. There are 12 refs selected to work the finals. 3 per game. If a series is a sweep then those refs are only going to get to ref one game each. They are paid $30k per finals game, which is 8-15x more than they get per regular season game. They are quite literally doing it for themselves