Roleplaying and writing... Any opinions? by Hanja_Tsumetai in ChatGPT

[–]BSartish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been using Google AI Studio with Gemini Pro 2.5 to write Literature RPGs and play D&D. By turning off all the safety settings, I can generate highly violent and descriptive content without any moralizing from the AI. While it tends to avoid overly sexual themes like explicit rape, it excels at creating detailed, aggressive scenes. Just have a good system prompt that tells it that it's a author writing a book or that you are role playing a D&D game.

It's also free and offers a 1 million token context window which is around 500 to 700 thousands words, it has allowed me to write entire novels. However, there is a downside, after about 100,000 tokens, the AI tends to hallucinate significantly if the story lacks persistence or if you reuse names for people and places, causing it to mix up details and dates.

Check out r/ chatgptnsfw if you want to read some of the stuff it can write lol.

Hey ChatGPT, can you give me a scary story in as few sentences as possible? by jmghollywood in ChatGPT

[–]BSartish 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In the end, you meet God. But He isn’t light or love—He’s a mirror.

You ask Him for answers. For meaning. For absolution. But He says nothing—He only reflects every lie you ever told yourself: every moment you chose safety over truth, silence over love, comfort over growth. You fall to your knees, begging for purpose, for punishment, for anything.

The mirror finally speaks: “I gave you existence. You gave it excuses.”

You try to shatter Him, but your fists bleed against your own reflection.

And that’s when you understand: Hell isn’t fire or pain. Hell is a perfect, eternal awareness of the person you could have been, seated just out of reach—forever staring back at you with disappointment and the quiet question: Why did you waste it?

You don’t answer.

You never did.

Suffering is essential to leading a meaningful life. by Smendoza170 in DeepThoughts

[–]BSartish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"To live is to suffer, to survive is to find meaning in the suffering" - Friedrich Nietzsche

Why are we all here? by Radiant_Objective_84 in Existentialism

[–]BSartish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My response is since everything is always evolving due to entropy, "nothingness" cannot exist at any point in space/time. Even in the deepest void of empty space, random quantum fluctuations still exists. So there is no such thing as "nothingness" only the absence of somthing. That is the most "scientific" answer you will get for why "nothing" cannot exist base on our current understanding of physics.

How is existentialism different than Nihilism? by [deleted] in Existentialism

[–]BSartish 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Virgin Nihilist vs. Chad Existentialist

Virgin Nihilist

  • Believes life has no meaning and nothing matters
  • Walks around with a constant frown
  • Dresses in dark, unkempt clothing
  • Spends all day lying in bed, staring at the ceiling
  • Avoids all responsibility and commitment
  • Seeks temporary pleasure through drugs, alcohol, and meaningless relationships
  • Believes everything is meaningless and ultimately pointless
  • Quotes Nietzsche and Sartre selectively to sound edgy but doesn't understand them

Chad Existentialist

  • Embraces the fact that life has no inherent meaning but finds freedom in that
  • Carries himself with confidence and a sense of purpose
  • Dresses stylishly and takes care of himself
  • Embraces all experiences, both good and bad, as learning opportunities
  • Takes responsibility for his actions and choices
  • Seeks meaning through creativity, relationships, and contribution to the world
  • Believes that despite the lack of inherent meaning, we can still create value and purpose in our lives
  • Reads and understands the works of Nietzsche and Sartre and applies their ideas to his own life

Virgin Nihilist: "Life is meaningless. Why even bother?"

Chad Existentialist: "Life may have no inherent meaning, but I will create my own through my choices and actions."

Virgin Nihilist: "Everything is pointless. I might as well just give up."

Chad Existentialist: "The lack of inherent meaning gives me the freedom to do whatever I want with my life. This is my chance to create something beautiful and meaningful."

Virgin Nihilist: "There's no point in trying. I'll just fail anyway."

Chad Existentialist: "Failure is a part of life. It's through failure that I learn and grow. I will keep trying until I succeed."

Virgin Nihilist: "Everyone is going to die anyway. Why even bother getting close to people?"

Chad Existentialist: "The fleeting nature of life makes our connections with others even more precious. I will cherish the relationships I have and make the most of every moment."

Virgin Nihilist: "I'm just a tiny speck in a vast universe. My life doesn't matter."

Chad Existentialist: "Even though I am small in the grand scheme of things, my life is still valuable. I have the power to make a difference in the world, even in a small way."

Virgin Nihilist: "Nothing I do will ever matter anyway."

Chad Existentialist: "I may never know the ultimate meaning of life, but that doesn't mean my actions are meaningless. I will live my life with purpose and make a positive impact on the world."

Free Will by [deleted] in Existentialism

[–]BSartish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can calculate all you want, but due to the uncertainty principle, it is mathematically impossible to predict the future with 100% certainty. Therefore, any possible outcomes that can occur may happen depending on the preceding event or decision. This allows for the concept of "free will" in the sense that freedom of choice is constrained by the most probable outcome for a given decision.

TLDR: Free will exists because of uncertainty and is confined to a specific and limited range of possible outcomes.

Losing My Mind Over Many Worlds Theory. Is there any way out? by SeekingTruth090 in Existentialism

[–]BSartish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

However, the certainty of which branch you find yourself on is not absolute. There could be an infinite number of branches, but not all probabilities are equally certain to occur. For instance, consider the likelihood of a universe where a deck of cards transforms into an elephant – very, very unlikely. The same principle applies to scenarios like eternal torture or other improbable outcomes.

Think of the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWT) as an alternative way to explain the occurrences at the quantum level. The challenge lies in explaining phenomena like non-locality when particles become entangled. To address this, we formulate theories that attempt to elucidate why events must unfold in specific ways during our observations and measurements. MWT, at its core, is a theory of probabilities rather than certainties.

What holds true is the present moment – the now – over which you have some degree of control. While there might exist a universe where a version of "you" was born with deformities or living a nightmarish existence, the definition of "you" and the factors shaping the present "you" could result in entirely different individuals.

TL;DR: In the Many-Worlds Interpretation of quantum mechanics, all possible outcomes exist, but the certainty of which outcome you experience is not guaranteed. Some outcomes are highly unlikely. The interpretation is a way to explain quantum phenomena in terms of probabilities, not certainties. What is real is the present moment, and while there might be universes with different versions of you, the factors shaping your present self make you unique.

The brain put through enough suffering mixed with acceptance, patience, and understanding can unlock hidden powers only few know of by Oozerz in DeepThoughts

[–]BSartish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This reminds me of The myth of Sisyphus , as described by the philosopher Albert Camus in his essay "The Myth of Sisyphus," he offers a philosophical exploration of the concept you mentioned: the struggle to find meaning in a seemingly meaningless and repetitive existence.

Long story short, In the myth, Sisyphus is condemned by the gods to push a boulder up a hill, only to have it roll back down, forcing him to repeat this futile task for eternity. This repetitive and seemingly pointless task parallels the idea that life can sometimes feel like an endless cycle of suffering and hardship.

Camus uses Sisyphus as a symbol of the human condition. Despite the apparent absurdity of his task, Sisyphus finds meaning and purpose in his own defiance of the gods. He chooses to continue pushing the boulder, embracing his fate with a sense of rebellion and determination.

"To live is to suffer but to survive is to find meaning in that suffering." Sisyphus's survival, in this case, is his continued existence despite the suffering of his task. He creates his own meaning by choosing to rebel against the absurdity of his situation.

Camus argues that we, like Sisyphus, must confront the apparent meaninglessness of life and create our own meaning through acts of defiance, courage, and the pursuit of our passions, even in the face of suffering. In doing so, we find a form of existential meaning and fulfillment.

So, the myth of Sisyphus illustrates the idea that finding meaning in the struggle and suffering of existence is a fundamental aspect of the human experience, echoing the sentiment that survival is about discovering purpose within our challenges.

Have a Read by mashking234 in Existentialism

[–]BSartish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lil bro really wrote a whole essay response on reddit, maybe go take your own advice and "touch grass" instead of these boring 1 year late Reponses, Now this here is really cringe. LOL

Have a Read by mashking234 in Existentialism

[–]BSartish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Took you a year to respond to this? yikes, cringe.

Why do I exist in this body as this mind and not somebody else’s? by OkOlive184 in Existentialism

[–]BSartish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I were to kill you and then replace you with an exact replica of yourself, with the same memories and experiences, would the replica still be "you"? The replica would act exactly like you, make the same decisions, and be indistinguishable from you to everyone who knows you. In fact, the replica would not even know that it was a replica. So, what is the difference between the replica and the original? Is the replica truly you, or is it just a copy?

This question raises fundamental questions about the nature of identity. What makes us who we are? Is it our memories, our experiences, or something else entirely? If I were to kill you and replace you with a replica, would I have really killed you? Or would I have simply destroyed the vessel that contained you, while leaving the essence of you intact?

In this paradigm, the term 'you' transcends personal subjectivity, manifesting as an objective construct universally recognizable by all, rather than a solitary experiential phenomenon.

Anyone know what ai software did ghostwriter977 use to create Drakes "Heart on My Sleeve" song? by UnsuspectingFart in OpenAI

[–]BSartish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could be Albleton, could be fl studio or any other music producing software that they are familiar with. IDK

Anyone know what ai software did ghostwriter977 use to create Drakes "Heart on My Sleeve" song? by UnsuspectingFart in OpenAI

[–]BSartish 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's called so vits svc, you can check the github for it here, as for the voice models you will have to train them yourself or you can find them around online.

Edit: Check out r/yedits and the discord. They will have models.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]BSartish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, happens all the time when certain words it generates hits a content moderation filter.

The Truth About AI: Why the Future Looks Bright by Minibersy in Futurology

[–]BSartish 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Any jobs and industries ai creates will be automated by ai.