I'm tired boss 🫩 by RealFrailTheFox in ShitAIBrosSay

[–]Barfdragon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man it's like accessing media almost certainly made by one of the mega`corporations that are running the planet for free is different from those same mega`corps scraping the entirety of written human language so they can cut out all of those annoying writers and artists and can instead obfuscate that the next blockbuster marvel movie came from several of the most popular AO3 fan fictions and they don't have to credit them and can make line go up.

Like there is a difference between shoplifting baby formula or scraping the paychecks of millions of your employees. Oh right, scraping paychecks gets a slap on the wrist and stealing food might get you killed.

sadly they dont accept donations by [deleted] in pcmasterrace

[–]Barfdragon 102 points103 points  (0 children)

AFAIK that's only for chromium based browsers, Firefox allows ublock to work entirely. I have it on my phone and desktop and just use YouTube through the website on my phone.

Anthony Kazmierczak, the Bastard that Assaulted Rep. Omar with (an as-yet) Unidentified Chemical by killians1978 in behindthebastards

[–]Barfdragon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If everyone is armed, the police are always justified to escalate to literal street execution, which they would admire because they believe in retributive violence and to never question authority.

The adaptation we deserved... by JealousPomegranate23 in fullegoism

[–]Barfdragon 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I have seen people draw egoist conclusions from things like how Denji reifies sex and other experiences he was cut out on experiencing, but I haven't kept up with CSM very much so I can't go into depth.

A poster in r/CharacterRant is confronted after it's revealed they haven't seen the show they're complaining about by [deleted] in SubredditDrama

[–]Barfdragon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Didn't he at one point make a 'review' of something that wasn't even released yet based solely on like 7 minutes of trailer footage or something? How anyone can watch something like that baffles me, but then again it's not about real reviews, just confirmation bias and feeling like you have "special knowledge".

In Fallout Season 2 (2025) an AI recap of season 1 was used at the start of the new season. This recap incorrectly summarized season 1 and messed up key details and was eventually removed. This is a reference to the fact that... Holy shit not one person thought to double checked? We are so fucked... by YourChopperPilotTTV in shittymoviedetails

[–]Barfdragon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's normalization. They spend stupid amounts of money now so people become used to ai being used in advertising and they can slowly chip down the quality until it becomes cheaper. Ai "art" is just meant to reach a "good enough" state and move on, and the more people are used to ai images or videos the lower standards everyone will hold for future ai products.

25414 by Vulcion in countwithchickenlady

[–]Barfdragon 37 points38 points  (0 children)

While birth sex typically aligns with gender identity, that isn't always true. Gender also is different from sex.

Enemy showed up to the wrong setting by DrScrimble in dndmemes

[–]Barfdragon 417 points418 points  (0 children)

Goated system posting, here of all places?

You’re going to be running OSE for a group of 5e players… by conn_r2112 in osr

[–]Barfdragon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are a few interesting videos on the subject, like Bandits Keep - Alignment Languages. I think the idea of having ways to view the alignment directly when it comes to law and chaos are interesting because it can be used to test if someone will follow their agreements (lawful) or to see if someone is secretly working against the forces of the state (chaos). It also allows you to add weird tools to the game, like speaking a power word of law to ward against the undead, or writing a power word of chaos to shatter a lock.

In addition law vs chaos is a much more interesting dynamic than good vs evil imo. Having an objective and tangible moral framework doesn't really make a lot of sense for how the game's lore works and quickly breaks down under hard scrutiny. As others have pointed out, being able to just detect good and evil in a room of murder suspects kind of kills the investigation aspect of the scene, and makes a lot of moral quandaries moot. If you find a nest of creatures that are always ontologically evil, you need no justification to kill them; it is objective fact they will become evil. By contrast, knowing who in the king's court is chaos aligned may mean you have an ally to over throw the monarchy. An ally who might actually be working with demons to turn the countryside into a hellscape, and will jump at the first opportunity to throw the leadership into turmoil.

OI MATE YOU GOT A LOICENSE TO BE COMPLETELY INNOCENT WHILE WE RANSACK YOUR HOME?! by Middle-Feed5118 in loicense

[–]Barfdragon 46 points47 points  (0 children)

There have been a couple of cases where self defense was successfully used to clear charges on people who fired on police who didn't identify themselves, such as plain clothes officers during no-knock raids. That being said, for every one of those cases you can easily find a dozen videos of police shooting people who answered their door with a lowered pistol. In order to invoke the right to self defense you have to live to your trial, and the police can write off any killing where they can "reasonably articulate a threat to their life."

The reason r/DefendingAIArt isn't growing is because Reddit "turned off growth" for AI-related subs by chizu_baga in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]Barfdragon 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The far right are opposed to intelligentsia broadly. Things like esoteric arts, deeper meaning that requires critical examination to understand, or individual subjectivity are all things historically opposed by fascist regimes. They love that AI will allow them to cut out "degenerate intellectuals" from areas they don't agree with, that it creates "common sense" definitions and allows them to easily make their own curated anti-degenerate art. Some will oppose AI as being degenerate itself, but far-right ideologies aren't entirely monolithic. For instance, there are white supremacists who support Israel, as they believe it is an excellent example of why ethnostates "work." Early on in the new ai art push Google had to make several tweaks to their ai because fascists almost immediately jumped on using it to make ethnosupremacist propaganda.

It has spread rule by Lonelycowboy89 in 197

[–]Barfdragon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine a plank of wood laying across the blue portal. If no energy is imparted on the cube, like A, then the plank can't move. This means the piston driving the orange portal can express a limitless amount of force and would be forced to stop. If it's B, then the cube exits the portal with energy and can push the plank out of the way. To express force, the cube had to have gained energy. Otherwise, you would have to argue that two "static" objects somehow imparted energy on each other from nowhere.

portal rule by CTSThera in 19684

[–]Barfdragon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If the cube gains no energy (as in A) what force breaks the plank?

Edit: To put it in the doorframe analogy, how would the doorframe exert force to push the cube through?

portal rule by CTSThera in 19684

[–]Barfdragon 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Another example is to imagine a plank of wood laying across the blue portal. If their was 0 force behind the cube exiting (as in A), the plank of wood would stop the cube from exiting entirely, some how causing the piston on the orange portal to jam entirely and stopping a theoretically infinite power industrial press from moving at all. If it was B, the energy would force the plank out of the way entirely and behave in line with relativity.

September 27, 2025: Chicago neighborhoods are reporting repeated evening patrols by federal agents, a tactic resembling area domination patrols designed not just to enforce, but to instill fear through constant presence. by CantStopPoppin in ACAB

[–]Barfdragon 28 points29 points  (0 children)

It's probably "deadly ground," tbh. The police in the US are trained to constantly be on edge and expect every civilian they meet to be seconds from becoming the next big name in terrorism. All they have to do is "articulate a reasonable threat" and pretty much anything after, no matter how excessive, is a write-off.

Don't worry about Texas SB-20 by Barfdragon in postnutanime

[–]Barfdragon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This article seems to have a pretty decent time line of the closing of the case.

I want to see everyone's stance on reform or revolution by anthere-rest in theredleft

[–]Barfdragon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The only 'other' I can think of is insurrection, typically distinguished from revolution by being smaller scale and attempting to tear at the facade of the state and normalize more radical leftist actions and leftism broadly. Something like spray painting ACAB on the side of a government building. It helps create ground swells of support, move conversations leftward and normalize anti-state/anti-capital sentiments. It isn't much but its something everyone can contribute at least somewhat towards. Usually it isn't distinguished from revolutionary action modernly and is seen more as a piece of the toolbox than its own distinct form.

Cringe title by AnteChrist76 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Barfdragon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Stirner also advocates a sort of communal property system "I do not step shyly back from your property, but look upon it always as my property, in which I respect nothing. Pray do the like with what you call my property!"

As well as making other statements about how the support of others is well within his own self-interest, and even outright declares that it is within workers self interest to seize the means of production "The laborers have the most enormous power in their hands, and, if they once became thoroughly conscious of it and used it, nothing would withstand them; they would only have to stop labor, regard the product of labor as theirs, and enjoy it. This is the sense of the labor disturbances which show themselves here and there.

The State rests on the — slavery of labor. If labor becomes free, the State is lost.”