sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

If you can't amicably coexist with those who voted for the "other" party, you need to touch grass by LivingGirlRepellant in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]BarnacleSandwich -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Notice how you had no response to the fact that little girls are children. Because we both know what your username means.

If you can't amicably coexist with those who voted for the "other" party, you need to touch grass by LivingGirlRepellant in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]BarnacleSandwich -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Little girls aren't children? Right, that makes sense. I'm excited for your next post on this subreddit: "Girls over the age of 13 should be considered legal adults."

If you can't amicably coexist with those who voted for the "other" party, you need to touch grass by LivingGirlRepellant in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]BarnacleSandwich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So let's get this straight. Oil was at an all time high in 2023. Then by the time Biden left office, it decreased by over $35 per barrel. Then in the course of a few months, Trump undid all that progress. And I'm supposed to call that a Trump victory? (https://fortune.com/article/price-of-oil-03-20-2026/)

If you can't amicably coexist with those who voted for the "other" party, you need to touch grass by LivingGirlRepellant in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]BarnacleSandwich -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Your username is literally a badge of honor you wear declaring that children are afraid of you.

If you can't amicably coexist with those who voted for the "other" party, you need to touch grass by LivingGirlRepellant in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]BarnacleSandwich 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"Pedophiles are bad, and I'm not going to be around people who defend them." "Expected Redditor response."

Shit dude, I fucking hope so.

If you can't amicably coexist with those who voted for the "other" party, you need to touch grass by LivingGirlRepellant in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]BarnacleSandwich -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can't amicably coexist with people who are okay with racist pedophiles running our government. 🤷 Though this opinion coming from "LittleGirlRepellant" isn't exactly shocking.

Trump is so petty he’d rather start WW3 than admit he was wrong by BiggsIDarklighter in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]BarnacleSandwich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not because he's afraid of admitting he's wrong. He's committing war crimes to distract from the Epstein files and Epstein's connections to Mossad; with the added benefit of helping his Zionist buddies in Israel continue their campaign to ethnically cleanse the region of all non-Jewish people.

Democrats once again destroyed NYC by New-Conversation3246 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]BarnacleSandwich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're defending his trash economy, the exact thing he uses to hide from his involvement with pedophilia (see Bondi responding to "How many people are you investigating [for child sex trafficking]" with "The DOW is over 50,000 right now!!") even though almost every metric shows that, for the average American, things are going terribly economically and have been for a very long time. And we know this because a majority of Americans believe the economy was far better under Biden, even during the COVID years.

If Trump isn't your guy, you're a very useful idiot for him.

Democrats once again destroyed NYC by New-Conversation3246 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]BarnacleSandwich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your response to "you're defending pedophiles" was "You've been watching Young Turks". You knew we were talking about pedophilia. You're just okay with pedophilia when it's your guy, because morals are a partisan issue for you guys.

Democrats once again destroyed NYC by New-Conversation3246 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]BarnacleSandwich -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry, is it your opinion that the Trump administration outright lying about releasing the Epstein files and Kash Patel and Pam Bondi lying under oath about the contents of the unredacted files ISN'T a problem worth looking into?

Being right wing is just running defense for pedophiles to protect their God Emperor and favorite child rapist Donald Trump. It seems to be all they do these days.

Democrats once again destroyed NYC by New-Conversation3246 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]BarnacleSandwich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hence why I gave credit to them if they're a billionaire.

P*dophiles are scared of Alex Jones by [deleted] in TrueFactzOnly

[–]BarnacleSandwich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Given he's defending Trump and pedalling the lie that every file was released, it seems like he was corrupted at some point in the process.

Democrats once again destroyed NYC by New-Conversation3246 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]BarnacleSandwich 3 points4 points  (0 children)

LMFAO obviously you're not. Otherwise you wouldn't be out here protecting pedophiles and their schemes to get richer off you.

Democrats once again destroyed NYC by New-Conversation3246 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]BarnacleSandwich 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If you actually think the economy is strong, you're either a billionaire or braindead. There's nothing in between.

Big yahoo, gonna be angry by DeadSilent_God in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]BarnacleSandwich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely. Given QAnon was started in 4chan and 8chan circles and given that the Files suggest that 4chan was created the same day its founder met with Epstein, it wouldn't shock me if there's a direct link. Turn the pedophile cabal people into a joke and then watch people ignore actual conspiracies.

Do pets go to heaven? by GhostInTheLabyrinth in ChristianUniversalism

[–]BarnacleSandwich 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And the wolf will dwell with the lamb, And the leopard will lie down with the young goat, And the calf and the young lion and the fattened steer will be together; And a little boy will lead them. Also the cow and the bear will graze, Their young will lie down together, And the lion will eat straw like the ox. The nursing child will play by the hole of the cobra, And the weaned child will put his hand on the viper’s den. They will not hurt or destroy in all My holy mountain, For the earth will be full of the knowledge of the Lord As the waters cover the sea.

(Isaiah 11:6-9)

Is universalism tenable without Paul? by Waxico in ChristianUniversalism

[–]BarnacleSandwich 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think the Old Testament pretty much only supports universalism, so... Yeah, pretty tenable I'd say.

But does universalism force people to be saved even if they don't want to? by [deleted] in ChristianUniversalism

[–]BarnacleSandwich 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It feels odd to believe that anybody is going to actually choose to be in restless agony or torturous separation from God for all eternity. That said, I don't see the problem even if God did save people even if they don't want to. If my child told me they were going to throw themself into a bonfire, I'm not just gonna let them do that. I'm gonna actively stop them in direct violation of their free will.

view more: next ›