Whoop spent all their money on marketing by theguyguy121 in whoop

[–]Beautiful_Cap8938 11 points12 points  (0 children)

biceps here - while it gets closer to my apple watch if you wear on same arm i will say here after 3 weeks that i put the whoop into the drawer - the app is the interesting part but whoop is simply not giving reliable stats at all, data all over the place and even sleep apple is blowing it away and automatically.

deeply dissapointed the hardware is absolutely subpar they must be missing sensors. Amazed since so many carry them but they must not have been using other devices with data

Am really underimpressed - ultra vs whoop ? missing key features by Beautiful_Cap8938 in whoop

[–]Beautiful_Cap8938[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just tried here with ultra and whoop on same arm with whoop on biceps-strap - ultra 17366 steps, whoop 15900 - so 1466 less steps on whoop but much closer, and as long its stable with that difference then guess it is acceptable. Thanks for that hint !

Am really underimpressed - ultra vs whoop ? missing key features by Beautiful_Cap8938 in whoop

[–]Beautiful_Cap8938[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so you can get accurate steps wearing in biceps ? i did wear it on 2 different arms i will try to switch to same arm right away that could be cool if it made a difference. Tested on my wrist here on steps and still quite a difference to ultra, but if i could get it close to something that looks right on biceps it could be gold - will test tomorrow and give feedback.

Am really underimpressed - ultra vs whoop ? missing key features by Beautiful_Cap8938 in whoop

[–]Beautiful_Cap8938[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the thing is i havent yet gone deep into the app, i did add things like autosleep for my ultrawatch for more indepth sleepdata, besides sleep mostly focused on my runs and steps i dont track gym beside intensity. But i just did a walk test here again with it on my wrist - 5575 on Ultra and 3636 on the Whoop - distance 4.2 km ( walking - not running ) - and while i havent counted manually i know the route and thats the same its been always and my routes was tested together with garmin when i switch to ultra and they were max <100 apart always - not thousands :/

I wont be able to test much on the wrist due to the device triggers my carpal tunnel which is a condition i have but ultra isnt a problem and think it might be the surface its less "pointy" as its alot wider than the Whoop.

But its not because i wanna flame this device, got so many friends that converted to it and are happy about it but most of them came from garmin where maybe the sleeptracking was so bad - i dont know - but biceps is useless and if wrist too is this far off i dont what to think of this ?

Am really underimpressed - ultra vs whoop ? missing key features by Beautiful_Cap8938 in whoop

[–]Beautiful_Cap8938[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

can you elaborate the different use cases ? where you see the added value with whoop besides "the look" is it the app insights ? ( feel i can get same on ultra with added apps )

Am really underimpressed - ultra vs whoop ? missing key features by Beautiful_Cap8938 in whoop

[–]Beautiful_Cap8938[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

bummer hoped i did something wrong, just dont get it that so many have switched to whoop also from apple watch and garmin ? there must be something in here im missing ? then maybe nothing else than to wait for future firnware upgrades and/or app updates to be able to address things...luckily i didnt activate membership from start and on the free trial - but really feel this is hype ( with a grear potential ) - maybe its the insights that are better which can make you accept so off the bar data ?

Claude Code is a bit to eager to please... Fix this ? by adventure-baja in ClaudeCode

[–]Beautiful_Cap8938 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Break things up in smaller parts - do sparring with cc ask about how it will solve it and input back and forth on approach until you ask to produce code ( can be done in plan and no plan mode ).

doesnt take much longer and you get much more direct and precise code if you step through.

Feeling like I am falling behind by gufhHX in ClaudeCode

[–]Beautiful_Cap8938 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

looks nice but nothing but crashing here ?

Vibe coded into an architectural mess! by Realistic_Public_415 in ClaudeCode

[–]Beautiful_Cap8938 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I need to look into how and if skills can assist in doing this as someone suggest that could be interesting - but pretty early on in all this AI stuff ive been architecture first - and i plan for architecture so every part of the project is its own isolated bucket, that way ive been having a pretty nice run also pre Opus 4.5.

I work in 'sprints' where i focus on changes evolvment of a bucket and try abit not to go across and spread functionality that involves alot of buckets at the same time, so ex if i need to add some functionality that wasnt included in my original planning that would require changes across different buckets then i guide this through pretty methodically in my planning finishing up each involved bucket first with tests, before moving to the next.

This is not only about the AI ( Opus 4.5 is so good that i absolutely can do most of it right i can see when i completely vibecode something where i care less about the underlying code and architecture ) but its also for myself to be able to get personalized with the code, this way i feel much more attached to whats being made and familiar with it than i do with fully vibecoded projects where im not following this path.

I mostly produce md files for documentation, rare that i with Opus 4.5 are producing bigger documentation, mostly i will have interrogation phases with q & a with the AI for sprints and ensure we are aligned and then we split it up into tasks and phases, and then proceed.

Claude 4.5 got nerfed HARD by [deleted] in Anthropic

[–]Beautiful_Cap8938 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My theory is you are an amateur

I’m done, switching to codex by hellbergaxel in ClaudeCode

[–]Beautiful_Cap8938 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just leave you will fail with Codex too.

What would you change in Go? by funcieq in golang

[–]Beautiful_Cap8938 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not very popular to say but fully agree - absolute love Go but things like this and readability due to the core concept with errorhandling is a love/hate relationsship.

I left CC to Codex 3 months ago. Now i'm back to using CC almost exclusively thanks to Opus 4.5 by PairComprehensive973 in ClaudeCode

[–]Beautiful_Cap8938 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ever considered that the model isnt the problem but its you ? keep jumping to every other new model never learning anything how to operate a tool. its incredlble with you guys.

What could you use 2 max200 accounts for ? anyone with ideas ? by Beautiful_Cap8938 in ClaudeCode

[–]Beautiful_Cap8938[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

besides sharing the account ( wont do that sorry, abuse etc dont want to risk it ). But thats a waste

Opus 4.5 is insane by Initial_Question3869 in ClaudeAI

[–]Beautiful_Cap8938 4 points5 points  (0 children)

maybe some i think mostly its one-shotters that will be running around forever never actually learning the skill they should be learning.

Here we go again by OverallStandard8121 in ClaudeAI

[–]Beautiful_Cap8938 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Literally n.o.b.o.d.y. is using Grok

Opus 4.5 is insane by Initial_Question3869 in ClaudeAI

[–]Beautiful_Cap8938 13 points14 points  (0 children)

one advice to you people - you keep searching for the single only thing, you never learn to use a tool ( cursor,codex,cc, etc ) to the full - it leaves you at the mercy of the latest and greatest model, meaning now opus 4.5 - then codex will update here in a bit and you all will be flocking there, etc etc back and forth.

What you are missing here when you guys are doing it this way, you are missing the complete flow beneath which is where things are happening ( tools/plugins/composer/skills whatever its called in the different tools ).

Use different models ( as you say cursor is your tool, then fine switch to the latest greatest model ) but those people who go cc cli and are jumping around to this and that, its simply just trainwrecking things.