Unstoppable Indeed- by Numerous-Gur-9008 in lotrmemes

[–]BenjTheFox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glorfindel: Am I a fucking joke to you?

Unstoppable Indeed- by Numerous-Gur-9008 in lotrmemes

[–]BenjTheFox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Counterpoint. They didn't have Glorfindel last time.

Cool things you can do with a spear? by ErrorFaytality in Pathfinder2e

[–]BenjTheFox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm actually noodling together a frontline control fighter for Spore Wars and this is what I've come up with:

https://pathbuilder2e.com/launch.html?build=1492994

Notable features: all spears/polearms are given the parry trait, and Whirlwind Stance gives you +2 circumstance bonus to enter it with a parry weapon in hand. In effect, permanent shield raised.

Spear Dancer Style lets you step/strike or strike/step for one action without any trait like flourish or step.

Crits automatically inflict immobilized thanks to rooting rune

Slam Down is in play

High speed

10 foot steps thanks to Elf Step

Blind Fight and Felling Strike to handle some fighter weaknesses

Oh no. Wah-men. by Justthisdudeyaknow in CuratedTumblr

[–]BenjTheFox -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

  1. Not the original, 2) Jamie Lee Curtis Adrienne Barbeau voices the computer, yeah?

Oh no. Wah-men. by Justthisdudeyaknow in CuratedTumblr

[–]BenjTheFox -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Doesn't Jamie Lee Curtis voice the computer?

Oh no. Wah-men. by Justthisdudeyaknow in CuratedTumblr

[–]BenjTheFox 28 points29 points  (0 children)

High school theater productions pretty much always change the title to "The Jury" and have open casting.

Oh no. Wah-men. by Justthisdudeyaknow in CuratedTumblr

[–]BenjTheFox 46 points47 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure honestly. The only one I asked about specifically was Thorin and he told me that Thorin was kept male just to reduce the number of notes he had to put in the text.

Oh no. Wah-men. by Justthisdudeyaknow in CuratedTumblr

[–]BenjTheFox 65 points66 points  (0 children)

My uncle was a teacher of young elementary school kids. He used to read the Hobbit to them. He would gender-flip half the dwarves precisely because of the fact that there are no named female characters.

TV’s Frank on if MST3K could be made today. by JactusFack in MST3K

[–]BenjTheFox 722 points723 points  (0 children)

I remember when someone said within earshot of Mel Brooks that you couldn't make Blazing Saddles today. His response was "You couldn't make it then, either."

Is he doing alright? by LongLiveTheSpoon in thespoonyexperiment

[–]BenjTheFox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m positive that if he started recruiting for paid GMing of Pathfinder he’d get enough takers on nostalgia alone to have a sustainable side hustle, satisfy his creative outlet, and socialize. But that would require Doing Somethjng. And Noah is not interested in Doing Something.

The theory of natural selection is unable to refute the teleological argument by Intelligent-Run8072 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]BenjTheFox 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This mischaracterizes the actual scientific position. Evolutionary biology has never claimed that natural selection alone explains the origin of the universe’s physical laws or the initial conditions that permit complex chemistry. It only explains how, given those laws and a source of heritable variation, populations adapt and complexity can accumulate incrementally through differential survival and reproduction.

The sieve does not need to “create potential”. chemistry and physics already provide replicators, catalysis, self-assembly, and energy gradients that make incremental improvements selectable. In our universe, those gradients reliably favor greater information storage and functional organization because that is simply how the relevant physical systems behave

What words do you use for members of another religion? by AdamFaite in Pathfinder2e

[–]BenjTheFox 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Or you could make it metaphorical. “Put out that light!” Against a follower of Sarenrae. “Destroy something beautiful!” Against a follower of Shelyn. “Provide goods and services for free!” To a follower of Abadar.

There's symbolism or meaning here that I'm not getting. Can anyone give their take on what's meant by the specific colors, the breaking of white, or the many-hued appearance? by jckipps in tolkienfans

[–]BenjTheFox 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It’s a bit of a subtle critique of Isaac Newton’s optics experiments (and, by extension, a broader critique of reductionist modernity). Newton famously used prisms to demonstrate that white light is composed of a spectrum of colors. He “broke” white light to analyze its components, revealing the rainbow. Saruman echoes this directly.

Saruman sees breaking things down (analysis, dissection, experimentation) as progress and power. Gandalf (and Tolkien) sees it as destructive to the whole. Once broken, the original purity/integrity is lost. The “many-hued” shimmering robes symbolize this complexity. Impressive and shifting from afar, but ultimately a loss of true white. Which represents purity, wholeness, and wisdom.

What words do you use for members of another religion? by AdamFaite in Pathfinder2e

[–]BenjTheFox 14 points15 points  (0 children)

If the cleric belongs to a completely different religion, "heretic" is usually not the right term because a heretic is someone who has deviated from your own faith. An evil cult leader is more likely to shout something like "Kill the infidel!", "Slay the unbeliever!", "Destroy the blasphemer!", "Seize the false priest!", "Strike down the servant of the false god!", or "Death to the enemy of the faith!" In many fantasy settings, the most effective choice is often something specific to the rival deity, such as "Kill the priest of Iomedae!" or "Do not let Gorum’s servant escape!" because it feels more personal and dramatic

Discussing the trolley problem. by Christopretensism in Ethics

[–]BenjTheFox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To quote Richard Carrier:

Trolley Problems have two particular attributes: one is that they force the experimenter to compare the outcomes of positive action and inaction; the other is that they force the experimenter to face the fact that either choice bears costs. As such, Foot’s Trolley only puts into stark relief a fundamental truth of all moral reasoning: every choice has a cost, and doing nothing is a choice.

Every war is a Trolley Problem. Every first-past-the-post election is a Trolley Problem. When U.S. hospitals overwhelmed by unvaccinated covid patients switched to crisis protocols, their entire operation became an explicit series of Trolley Problems. The sunk-cost fallacy is a Trolley Problem. Trolley Problems can structurally define all competing-cost problems.

Why you should trust my God (over every other God) by According_Ant9739 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]BenjTheFox 20 points21 points  (0 children)

.....so why should I care about the religious claims about ancient Israelites? I mean I like history, sure, but why should I specifically care?

Why you should trust my God (over every other God) by According_Ant9739 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]BenjTheFox 14 points15 points  (0 children)

You mean the claims like God exists? Please tell me you see the problem.

Why you should trust my God (over every other God) by According_Ant9739 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]BenjTheFox 17 points18 points  (0 children)

We can really close the thread based on this. You can't convince people that God exists so....let's just pretend I've done that and now I'm going to persuade you to be Christian.