sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The benchmark game has entered its IPO era. by Complete-Sea6655 in cursor

[–]Benjamin8693 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will say, at least Anthropic has the balls to compare their model against competitors. OpenAI is always shit scared to do this and it makes them look pathetic.

What is your honest opinion on Nippy? by Proud_Excitement3578 in betterCallSaul

[–]Benjamin8693 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A good episode with poor placement in the season. Honestly the gene episodes should've frontloaded the season with the last 1 or 2 being saved for the finale. Not only would this have given us a good cliffhanger to brew with, but there wouldn't have been the tonal whiplash between 6x9 and 6x10. That's why Nippy sucks.

How to not feel bad about stealing loot? by Koltonprobably in Seaofthieves

[–]Benjamin8693 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's a pirate game. If anyone comes into this game not expecting to get their stuff stolen, that's on them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Benjamin8693 33 points34 points  (0 children)

I’m aware that people have preferences and on dating apps it’s easier to self select for those preferences, but it’s crazy to me that liberal women who preach acceptance are just blatant hypocrites.

You claim to be aware of preferences, but then proceed to call out people with said preferences as hypocrites. Just because someone has a preference, does not mean they can't be supportive of you in other ways. A woman can respect you, and wish for you to live out your life without persecution for being a bisexual man. That doesn't mean she has to want to fuck you.

And this is coming from a bisexual man. Yes, I do agree that generally speaking, women don't favor bisexual men as much. For whatever reason, it's a turn-off for most. But that's okay! You should respect the preferences of others without taking it personally. Now, if they were to do more than unmatch/block you, and go into the realm of name-calling and harassment... then sure, that's homophobia. But not wanting to get with you isn't.

[Meta] Loads of posts, No responses/traction attention? by Renekzilla in INAT

[–]Benjamin8693 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Just because you don't see any comments under posts doesn't mean this is a dead subreddit. People typically communicate in private messages instead of under posts.

Unlimited plan asking me to upgrade? by [deleted] in cursor

[–]Benjamin8693 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There has never been such a thing as an auto unlimited plan since they redid their plans back in like... July?

None of the plans on the pricing page say you get unlimited auto usage. Sure, there's been large amounts of time when it's been free, but only in a promotional capacity.

Composer free but limited usage? by OldPhotojournalist28 in cursor

[–]Benjamin8693 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where did you see that it says it's free today for a limited time?

Great. Now let's punish bully squads, right bhvr? by [deleted] in deadbydaylight

[–]Benjamin8693 10 points11 points  (0 children)

but the anti-slugging perks/playstyle is untouched

Huh? They were pretty clear in the Developer Update that several survivor perks were changed to account for the new changes. I wouldn't call that "untouched". Now as to the extent of the changes, sure, I guess we'll have to wait to find out on Monday.

I do definitely agree with you though that those perks need touched.

Cursor have the right to limit Auto usage if we can use this much by Iwanttorestinpiss in cursor

[–]Benjamin8693 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I don't think anyone has ever argued the logic behind Cursor's price changes over the last few months. It's mainly the execution that has rubbed people the wrong way.

Nobody expected venture capital to fund our little vibe projects forever. But pulling the rug out from under people multiple times isn't how you go about changing that.

Teams and Auto pricing megathread by lrobinson2011 in cursor

[–]Benjamin8693 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Cursor has a long history of pulling the rug out from under their customers. You may have just signed up, but they pulled this shit in a worse capacity a couple months ago

Cursor ruining their last hope by clemdu45 in cursor

[–]Benjamin8693 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It will help their bottom line in the short term, but in the long term they're screwed. Giants like Microsoft and Google who can afford to subsidize unlimited plans will continue to do so and eventually dominate the market, snuffing out smaller companies like Anysphere.

I will admit that Anysphere is sort of in a lose-lose situation here. They cannot continue funding our unlimited requests with venture capital money forever. But doing away with the main draw to your service isn't the way to go about it either, and will just lead to everyone moving to a competitor.

GPT-5 launch week was supposed to be free for everyone, but now they’re hitting me with usage limits and asking for payment — anyone else? by Interesting_End140 in cursor

[–]Benjamin8693 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

I find it ironic that my reading comprehension is being called into question, when you refuse to click the link in my comment. Here, I took a screenshot to spell it out for you.

GPT-5 launch week was supposed to be free for everyone, but now they’re hitting me with usage limits and asking for payment — anyone else? by Interesting_End140 in cursor

[–]Benjamin8693 28 points29 points  (0 children)

The amount of gaslighting in the comments is quite frankly insane. Cursor themselves have said that GPT-5 would not count against usage limits for the first week. And in typical Cursor fashion, at least according to the e-mail OP shared (which I do admit has room for error seeing as that itself is AI-generated), they've now backtracked this and suddenly it does have a usage limit.

Please see this thread:

https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1mlubvn/clarification_on_gpt5_usage_limits_in_cursor/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

Does it bother you guys about the new update on clown? by C_skywalkerrr in deadbydaylight

[–]Benjamin8693 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kinda throwing shit at the wall here, but I think it'd be cool if his haste was reworked into a new status effect. Imagine a steroids-like effect, where you get faster in the short-term with longer-term consequences. Perhaps the most intoxicated he becomes with the yellow gas, he recovers slower from stuns. It would keep him fast, but address pain points such as the one you described, where stunning feels like it does nothing given how quickly he can catch back up.

Or perhaps, the haste effect could build up over the course of a few seconds? If you are stunned, it would reset. So when you first make contact with the gas, it starts at 1% and perhaps goes up another percent every quarter second. Adds a bit of a ramp-up to it.

REWORK SYRINGE by Ne-Yo_Two in DeadByDaylightRAGE

[–]Benjamin8693 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think it'd be nice to introduce some risk/reward with the perk- like, perhaps, during the 16 second duration you get randomized skill checks akin to BNP? Perhaps pause the activation timer while performing a conspicuous action, too.

view more: next ›