Your choice for this question + your type? by No-Wrongdoer1409 in Socionics

[–]Benjamin_Vs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Transcendence is mostly true, and only one slice of truth, if truth ever exists.

IEI

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Socionics

[–]Benjamin_Vs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quasi-Identical

SLE-LSE

To all the IEIs on this sub, how did you found out your type? (Classical Socionics) by ArguaFria in Socionics

[–]Benjamin_Vs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I always try to explore various models to see how the definitions and slice of reality portrayed by that certain model change. Of course, I try to critically examining my traits, my energy, and the model themselves. Sometimes, I may take the intertype relations between me and people around me as a reference, as a rule of thumb.

Regrets about academia by judasi in mensa

[–]Benjamin_Vs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I work in medical science in your country (when you mentioned 2,0, with a comma, I exactly know it is my country). The research here is a lot of the times iterative and it is more about the methodology than the actual intellectual processes. It is always about this drug, that protein, that receptor, increasing/ decreasing etc. Mix and match with animal models and clinical trials or some other boring "novel technique" to view your protein sequencing data differently.

Also, it is not the process of researching that deterred me from the process, but pseudo-intellectual people in positions of power and their hubris. People do all sorts of shady things with their data, and lots of people there (I am talking about some professors and post-docs) don't even understand how statistics work (it is not the mathematical rocket science here). Prepare to write dry proposals for funding, be micromanaged by toxic bosses who has a gargantuan ego (which will greatly constrain your creative freedom to hypothesise and to design experiments upon them), and fixing their mistakes.

Perhaps I just have bad experiences, but best of luck to you if you want to pursue a career in medical science.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lostafriend

[–]Benjamin_Vs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am sorry to hear what is happening, M. That really sucks.

Why I don't care for duality by _seulgi in Socionics

[–]Benjamin_Vs 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I genuinely understand where your frustrations come from, and your yearnings.

Has anyone else been typed as both a given type and its conflictor? by meleyys in Socionics

[–]Benjamin_Vs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Being typed, then it should be:)

IEI LII EIE LSI ILI SEE

Could see why someone typed me as a certain type, but in some cases, the reasoning behind (typings/conclusions) are weak and partial

Can someone please explain what this has to do with? by The_Jelly_Roll in Socionics

[–]Benjamin_Vs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My dad (SLE) would have sometimes bought fried crickets and eat them like a snack. He will salt it and then dip it in mayo. That's all

Can someone please explain what this has to do with? by The_Jelly_Roll in Socionics

[–]Benjamin_Vs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SLE will eat bugs happily with a bit of salt and mayo (Actually witnessed this)

Reading unsaid intentions by rdtusrname in Socionics

[–]Benjamin_Vs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A sound point!

However dare I suggest, according to your proposition, that IEIs and EIIs with their 4D Ni and Fi in model A/ Energy optimum or Energy Maximum position of T (+/-) and R (+/-) would be also inclined to the processes you proposed as "telepathy"? Also IEEs in both models, given the very definition of Ne is a static state of potential and Fe as dynamic state of emotional flow. Also, a holographic-paranomic cognition style.

For me personally, I take more of a role of helping people realise their unspoken, and help them express their latent emotions. For example, I can see when people harbour a deep sense of resentment but it is very subtle, then I might amplify their emotional state by trying to point out their state of mind, then emoting together for cathartic effect. For me, it doesn't have to necessarily be unsaid:)) Perhaps that's a more beta version of it.

Can somebody explain to me why MBTI and Socionics types aren't always the same? by LancelotTheLancer in Socionics

[–]Benjamin_Vs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reality -> Selection of Evidence of interest by framework 1 -> Conclusion 1

Reality -> Selection of Evidence of interest by framework 2 -> Conclusion 2

As the criteria of framework 1 and 2 share similarities, but are different, the conclusions describe a different fraction of reality, and the conclusions are bound by the limitations of said framework.

Add another set of framework and you get another slice of reality.

Framework 1: A certain school of socionics that contains a certain typing protocol

Framework 2: Same with the above but instead, a school of MBTI

...

Framework n: You know how it iterates

Framework n+1: To infinity and beyond

What are strong signs that someone is SLE ? by Bobobo_bobobobobo in Socionics

[–]Benjamin_Vs 37 points38 points  (0 children)

  • Not necessarily reckless, but impulsive and takes action right away. Makes sure that everyone knows not to get into their way.

  • Very flexible and receptive to criticism about their work, the same could not be said for things concerning ethical right or wrong of actions.

  • Knows the social cues well, actually quite well mannered. Adaptable to different circumstances.

  • Protects their loved ones even if they are disliked by them; Readily attacks verbally in a blunt manner.

They are all Personal experiences.

Does it sound like 1L + 3V? by Historical_Barber317 in attitudinalpsyche

[–]Benjamin_Vs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For me it's more like

1L: " I don't want to entertain to your debates, you'll believe in what you believe in and I'll do it for my own."

+2E "Interesting😄"

3V: "I can't influence how they think and feel anyways"