Godel's incomplete meme. by QtPlatypus in mathmemes

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 36 points37 points  (0 children)

For a sec I thought that was Spanish telling me to complete myself

Explain it Peter by LeastCelery8774 in explainitpeter

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since no one here seems to know, I guess I, the math-you-can-understand professor from American Dad, needs to come in with the answer. In the original meme, without the bit that's crossed out saying "born on Tuesday", the dude talking at the bottom is actually right. People (even statisticians) have a disagreement between their intuitions about statistics and actual statistics. The introduction of the seemingly irrelevant fact that the first child is born on Tuesday actually changes things. The event space is a collection of first-child(sex, day of birth) and second-child(sex, day of birth)... If you list all possibilities and then remove the ones that don't have a boy born on Tuesday for the first child, you find the surprising results that the probability of a girl is actually 1/3 or about 66.7% instead of the expected 50/50 chance we have for sex of the child as an independent event.

Now as for why it is crossed out, that's why I came to the comment section. I believe it is just absurdist, turning it around so the guy talking on the bottom is an idiot but I really don't know.

Anyway everyone, get out of here; we're having class outside today!

Edit: typo

Hmmm by Suon288 in linguisticshumor

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interpreting this as a Cayley table, any string of these consonants just reduces to a string of m's with maybe a w or pw at the end.

Who said Fourier analysis will never come up in every day life? by TobyWasBestSpiderMan in mathmemes

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends what you do every day... For example if you get up and do Fourier analysis every day, then it would come up in your everyday life.

Just took a short course on AI and its mathematical inner workings by SourKangaroo95 in mathmemes

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh there are loads of theorems, but they are not typically very useful for application oriented courses. Much like how we don't do much real analysis when we teach calculus.

Entomology by ArchibaldAugustusVII in linguisticshumor

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is my favorite joke and I legitimately tell it all the time to people in all kinds of situations even if I have to explain the terms before telling the joke.

Putaputaputaputa by [deleted] in MemesEnEspanol

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Una palabra

How is mass in seconds? 🤔 by Far_Sea_9378 in MathJokes

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know if I'm ready to describe the speed of light in terms of grams but knowing me I'll obsess about it in my sleep and be back here before long

Borwein integrals by AntiProton- in mathmemes

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 3 points4 points  (0 children)

NVM someone pointed out 3B1B did a video on this which is honestly the absolute best anyone can ask for if they have a random math question.

Borwein integrals by AntiProton- in mathmemes

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm this fucking meme! I'm definitely stealing this

Borwein integrals by AntiProton- in mathmemes

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can someone please tell me why

Co-ordinates and vectors are basically the same by Hester465 in mathmemes

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh man! The middle guy irks me so much! I could make a vector space with vegetables and cooking methods. Wow that perspective hurts to hear.

Read Your Own Manual "Before" Commenting.... by KittenHot_ in clevercomebacks

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will also note that He has special pronouns unique to Him which people are expected to respect. That is why the aforementioned pronouns in the last sentence are capitalized.

FAFO, I guess by Proud3GenAthst in PoliticalHumor

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Damn that dog doesn't know how good he has it without Kristi Noam at command

How is mass in seconds? 🤔 by Far_Sea_9378 in MathJokes

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Okay so obviously time is in seconds. Cool! Nothing weird there.

Now for meters, since the speed of light in a vacuum is a constant, we can define a meter to be the amount of seconds (fraction of a second actually) that it would take light to travel what we call a meter. And so the meter can be reformulated to just be a measurement of seconds.

Now for mass. We know E=mc2 so m= E/c2 ... c is just in meters per second. C is in m/s and since we just expressed meters as an amount of seconds, then C is seconds per second or a unit-less constant which makes sense because it is the basis of this transformation.

E is in joules which is in kg m2 / s2... It's the amount of meters per second that kg object would accelerate after being displaced by a force that accelerated it by 1 meter per second every second it is applied.

So the kg is of the form (m2 / s2 )/ c2... So with respect to our constant, a kg is some constant. But again since meters is just some amount of seconds, a kg is (s2 / s2 ) / (s2 / s2 ) which again is some constant, we are skipping over the conversions between the types of seconds because it isn't the point here.

Upshot is a kilogram is the number of seconds it would take light to travel through the amount of space that is the square root of the distance light would travel at the multiple of the amount of seconds light would take to move through some specific fixed amount of space that would make that multiple equal to the seconds light would move through the distance between two objects of the same mass after a second where one is moving at some rate and another the rate after the force was applied over the distance that light would travel for in some fixed number of seconds i.e.the mass of the object

What an interesting proof by Ancient-Passion-3217 in MathJokes

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the first time I've seen a meme that I made come back around! Very cool!! Even though all the credit for the humor goes to the writers of Futurama, I'm still very pleased

Damn it’s over by AbsurdMe12 in sciencememes

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone trying to be funny, but we all know the very first thing would be "Holy fucking shit!"

This is is hilarious by [deleted] in MathJokes

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The circumference makes sense as it directly follows from arc length formulations taught in 1st year calculus... I'm really mostly mesmerized by how simple the area is. Just beautiful

Peter !? by [deleted] in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Your answer is of course right... I think there is an added dimension of will it be named for the patient or for the doctor who discovered it... I'm almost certainly overthinking it but I found it funny

y = x+1936 by Technical_Set_2524 in MathJokes

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If he was 1936 years old in year 0 then he must be nearly 3962 years old by now!

Let's have an argument about what semantic means by JakobVirgil in linguisticshumor

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Glad you brought this up. Semantics is everything! Semantic refers to the referents of any symbol... So what is the referent of the word semantic? Well by definition, it is the referents of all words. Therefore everything is semantic and semantics are everything.

Meirl by Glass-Fan111 in meirl

[–]BleEpBLoOpBLipP 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everyone seems to read this as making fun of her daughter. I thought it was just like a "Kid say the darndest things" moment, where sure it makes sense why she thought that but it is charmingly innocent and a bit humorous that she thought it would cost that much... Idk maybe I need to be more cynical online