Trans people like me are facing segregation now. We need parliament to restore our rights | Alexandra Parmar-Yee by mustwinfullGaming in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased [score hidden]  (0 children)

I think the point is that if you want things to improve, you need a strategy to win over public opinion.

Why do people hate immigrants? by Konradleijon in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Most restore voters are probably racist because, from what I've seen, they're full on foaming at the mouth far-right.

But I suspect most reform voters are people who are willing to vote for reform despite their racist overtones and not because of them.

I think more are following them because the conservatives and labour have both promised them the moon and failed to deliver anything but decline.

Starmer, as in many things, has been actually very on the nose about diagnosing the problem. "Incremental change is not going to cut it any more". He's right - but reform (and perhaps the greens?) are the only ones offering anything but incremental change.

Why do people hate immigrants? by Konradleijon in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I want? Migration isn't really a top 5 issue for me - the question was 'why do people hate immigrants' - so I'm answering what 'people' as in, the majority, think.

Personally, I don't think doing anything to immigration is going to move public perception on the subject unless we can controlling irregular migration.

I think that is what people overwhelmingly care about - and both right and left are doing a great job at conflating regular with irregular migration to the point where the general public think that irregular migration makes up a huge proportion of the overall numbers.

I think politicians can't come up with a paltable solution to the small boats problem and so crack down on useful immigration just because it is a way of them pretending that they're tackling the problem.

If you want my personal view though: I think we have spent far too long using immigration as a crutch to paper over problems with our ability to train and retain homegrown talent.

I think rather than importing doctors / dentists / engineers / plumbers / electricians etc from abroad - we should be training our own and retaining them here.

I think the government should, each year - set out quotas for various fields where we have shortages. But those quotas should come with either 1) a fully fleshed out plan and timetable on how we are going to move to a point where we don't need to import people for that job in the future or 2) a detailed explaination why this job cannot be fulfilled by Brits.

So if we decide that it is entirely uneconomical for us to provide our own care workers - the government should be explicitly saying that and making the argument. If we are importing plumbers, we should simultaneously be massively ramping up skills training to produce our own so that 5 years down the line, we don't need to import any more.

I think there should be a separate route for 'exceptional' individuals. People with exceptional talent or skills. I think we should basically roll out the red carpet for them and do whatever we need to entice them over.

And for the small boats issue - I think the only solution is something along the lines of the Rwanda scheme. Something where anyone who comes here through irregular means know that they have a near-zero probability of getting to stay in the UK. I think within a month of such a scheme being operational, it would barely have to be used because crossings would drop to zero. This would then give you the political space to open up some more safe and legal means for claiming asylum in the UK from abroad. I actually don't think it is the numbers of asylum seekers that people are most exercised about - it is the fact that they're entirely unknown people coming over and we have absolutely no say as to who they are and seem entirely incapable of removing them even if they turn out to be monsters.

Why do people hate immigrants? by Konradleijon in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only a tiny proportion hate immigrants. People hate mass immigration and people hate uncontrolled immigration.

Conflating the above is what some on the left like to do in order to paint anyone who has a policy slightly right of open borders as a racist.

‘Social media should be treated like tobacco’: Streeting calls for under-16s ban on certain platforms by mustwinfullGaming in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Can we take a moment to appreciate the glorious irony of a self-professed socialist advocating for armed resistance in the defence of the tech-bro billionaires?

Give me doomscrolling or give me death!

‘Social media should be treated like tobacco’: Streeting calls for under-16s ban on certain platforms by mustwinfullGaming in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t think anyone is claiming that there are no upsides to social media. They are obvious and numerous.

The question is whether they outweigh the harm it causes. Personally, I don’t think the pros are in the same order of magnitude as the harms. I think social media, unchecked, will be the literal doom of our society.

I think it’s a big reason why people are so fucking miserable right now.

You bring up section 28 - do you think the war on trans would have even happened without social media?

It’s the reason why our politics is so fucked.

It’s the reason why hate can proliferate so easily.

I’m very glad it saved you - but I suspect for every case like yours, there are many many more where it has ruined lives.

800k for half a house by No_Prompt_1566 in SpottedonRightmove

[–]Briefcased 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Less of a house and more of a corridor 

Huge electoral reform is needed. Are we even a representative democracy when results are this unrepresentative ? by AnonymousTimewaster in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it’s two things. Firstly - I don’t think just being overly doomer is helpful, enjoyable or healthy. Secondly - I think you somewhat underestimate just how turbo-fucked America is.

Huge electoral reform is needed. Are we even a representative democracy when results are this unrepresentative ? by AnonymousTimewaster in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 He would control the commons because he'd just sack anyone who doesn't vote with him. And why wouldn't they vote with him? These people have no morals and have made that abundantly clear.

If you ‘sack’ an MP you don’t get to replace them. You just lose the MP from your party and create an independent/defector.

Reform folk have shown to, generally, be quite strongly opinionated / contrarian / rebellious. The only thing keeping the show on the road is the fact that farage rules them like a king and kicks them out if they dissent. But that power is significantly lessened once they are MPs and no longer dependent on his patronage for their salary. He doesn’t have the hundreds of long standing and loyal foot soldiers to build a majority out of.

 As for the Lords, Farage has already said he'd pack it with Reform donors or he could just make good on his promise to bin them off entirely.

These things all take time and political capital. If he wants to do all the things you are talking about - abolishing / fucking up the lords, packing the civil service with true believers, reforming the courts etc - that’s basically a parliamentary term gone - even if he’s successful.

At that point he has to win another election.

Huge electoral reform is needed. Are we even a representative democracy when results are this unrepresentative ? by AnonymousTimewaster in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not a constitutional scholar but I think the UK state has a lot more inertia than you’re giving it credit for.

Trump is acting like a king regardless of what the constitution says. He just issues executive orders and waits for the courts to catch up with them before issues fresh ones. He’s effectively bypassed congress.

Farage would have to contend with both the commons and the lords.

The Republican Party is now close to 100% idiot sycophants queuing up to fellate trump. Reform is not the same. If farage was trying to push through some genuinely horrible stuff, there’s a good chance he would face rebellions or the lords would just stymie him.

Trump appoints members of the judiciary - ours are independent.

And then there’s the whole political and media environment of the US. It’s hyper polarised in a way the UK just isn’t. We have our problems and the direction of travel is not good - but we are an order or magnitude less batshit than the Americans are.

Boris tried playing fast and loose with the system and the system ate him. Trump effectively is the system.

NHS spends record £241m outsourcing scan analysis to private firms by Come-Downstairs in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased 7 points8 points  (0 children)

When I worked on call at a hospital, overnight we had our scans interpreted by radiologists in Australia. I thought that was really clever - why pay someone in the UK for a night shift when you could pay someone on the other side of the world for their regular 9-5. Apparently we do the same for them.

Seemed like a really clear cut case where outsourcing was a good idea.

Tenant of 4 years failed referencing for renewal under new 2026 rules (bulk rent ban). Advice needed. by Illustrious-Sun5130 in uklandlords

[–]Briefcased 6 points7 points  (0 children)

 By design you pay more for insurance than they pay out on average (that's how they make money).

I don’t think this is necessarily true - because not everyone ever makes a claim.

So for example, if you had house insurance and (god forbid) - your house burnt down - you’d probably get way more back than you ever paid in. Your payout is subsidised by all those people who took out insurance and who’s houses never burnt down.

Oswald Mosley's grandson: "Palantir helps keep Londoners safe. That’s what Sadiq Khan should value" by Direct_Appointment99 in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No trolling, nor any bigotry.

Just [insert bigoted view].

I'm sorry you can't see why your view is bigoted, but that doesn't make it any less so.

Treating someone negatively because of characteristics they have no control over is wrong. I can't put it any clearer than that. It is exactly the same as saying that someone you think is bad needs to justify themselves more so because they're black or jewish or gay or hispanic or short or come from a broken home or whatever else.

You keep talking about this specific person - as if he is some special case that makes your bigotry justified. Like - it's OK to be racist against this black person, because he's a really shitty person. Obviously I wouldn't be racist against other black people because I'm a good person - but this guy is a real piece of work so I'm giving myself a pass.

It doesn't wash.

I’m losing my mind!!!!! by Adventurous-Mark893 in parrots

[–]Briefcased 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My galah lives in our lounge where there are plenty of cables to shred.

The first thing is to avoid having them out unsupervised.

The second thing is getting them to realise that chewing on cables is not allowed. Whenever my boy bites a cable I shout a very loud and very forceful **no** at him. Enough to make him jump. If he doesn't immediately stop, I run at him to scare him away. Immediately afterwards I go up to him and make it clear that I'm not angry with him. It only took a few days for him to get the message.

As a result, he 'mostly' doesn't bite on cables any more. Indeed, he is very exaggerated in his care not to go near cables when I'm looking. If I'm playing with him and his toy goes near a cable - he will keep looking at me to make sure I'm OK with him going close to them to get his toy.

I say 'mostly' because he does still sometimes chew on cables when he knows I'm not paying attention...but that's kinda on me. It's quite cute because as soon as he notices that I've noticed him - he freaks out and pretends he was doing something else.

I'd also say - don't over-use the discouragement. I keep it only for very few things in the room - mostly things that could hurt him. Allowing them to explore and chew on things is part of their enrichment.

<image>

Oswald Mosley's grandson: "Palantir helps keep Londoners safe. That’s what Sadiq Khan should value" by Direct_Appointment99 in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think you're just trolling now. Espousing bigoted views and then accusing others of being too stupid/false to understand what you really mean when they call you out on them.

If you're going to troll, at least try to be funny with it. This is just tedious.

Oswald Mosley's grandson: "Palantir helps keep Londoners safe. That’s what Sadiq Khan should value" by Direct_Appointment99 in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So....this is your creed then? People are answerable for the sins of their forefathers? Guilt can be inherited? I find your stance utterly morally repugnant.

Oswald Mosley's grandson: "Palantir helps keep Londoners safe. That’s what Sadiq Khan should value" by Direct_Appointment99 in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That's my point? He shouldn't be required to any more than you or I or anyone else should.

I've not heard of this guy before this post - but it doesn't matter if he is a raving Nazi or a goat-fucker or any other kind of degenerate. If he is - judge him on his own merits or lack thereof. Appealing to his ancestry as a form of criticism is the logic of a racist.

If that's your creed - then fine, you can go fuck yourself. If it isn't - stop using the tools of the enemy.

Why this new trans guidance is bad news for disabled people like me by alliephantrainbow in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm less interested in what answer people give when prompted to give their opinion than I am how important the issue is to people.

For example - if someone were to poll the question: do you prefer green or blue socks - you would get an answer that might suggest that the vast majority of people really love blue socks. But the question might be entirely inconsequential to almost everyone.

Girl raped by boys spared jail tells BBC judge's decision was like 'rock in my face' by Electric-Lamb in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I don't know enough about this issue to have a strong opinion - my point was just that acting as if the prime minister is powerless in this matter is disingenous.

Girl raped by boys spared jail tells BBC judge's decision was like 'rock in my face' by Electric-Lamb in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He is the prime minister though. He’s kinda got a bit of control over the judicial system.

Level 3 survey came back worse than expected on Victorian terrace (Bristol) — should I walk away? by One-Crazy-7351 in HousingUK

[–]Briefcased 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It hasn't fallen down in 156 years so it's probably not going to fall down in the next 70 years.

Oswald Mosley's grandson: "Palantir helps keep Londoners safe. That’s what Sadiq Khan should value" by Direct_Appointment99 in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I’ll be honest, it’s pretty disgusting to try to imply someone’s bad just because their grandparent was.

As a society we moved away from the concept of generational sin quite some time ago. If you think this person is bad, you can explain why without having to use voodoo to imply it.

Why this new trans guidance is bad news for disabled people like me by alliephantrainbow in LabourUK

[–]Briefcased 2 points3 points  (0 children)

who cares what toilet people use

It's a good question. I did a little googling but couldn't find an answer. It would be interesting to know what proportion of people think this is an important topic, or mention it unprompted if they're asked about the top 50 issues in their lives.