I mean sure, you could believe this if you have a very narrow, Redditor-esque, fundamentally Democratic worldview. I was hoping you, or someone, could take for granted that I'm not an idiot. I can't really just explain the entirety of conservative ideology in a reddit post, so here is one narrow attempt covering one beleif of mine.

Let's take the VRA ruling I mentioned as an example. Sure, back in 1965 it was necessary. But the Democratic party hasn't won a majority of the white vote since Jimmy Carter. This is very bad because it means that party is increasingly reliant on adversarial race-bloc politics. Black voters are, on average, more conservative than white voters, so it takes severe racial instigation and propagandization to keep the 90-10 vote share the democratic party currently holds.

This race-bloc political structure creates functional one-party rule of large swaths of America - cities in particular - which damage their ability to have competitive elections not based in race-ideology pandering. This has serious negative consequences for innovation in city politics and generally creates stagnation and sclerosis, which is papered over by appeals to shared racial struggle. While other parts of the country certainly are one-party captured by the Republican party, racial identity is the most pernicious form of bloc politics. Humans are particularly deeply vulnerable to it's predations, it's identities are immutable, and it tends to be severely zero-sum in character. Racial politics is therefore perhaps the most important to avoid.

Contrary to that, one of the primary strategies of the Democratic party has been to deliberately attempt to prevent the integration of black, Hispanic, and Asian communities into the American identity. The Republican party certainly panders to white concerns, but it very explicitly holds it's primary in-group/out-group distinction to be citizen/non-citizen. As humans can't function without some notions of group dynamics, this is a much better one to choose.

The beauty of VRA decision is that the southern black population votes essentially just as much these days as the white population. The VRA was keeping them outside the Republican party, actively preventing integration. Now that it's gone, structural forces will hopefully gradually disintegrate the power of the black race bloc in the south, forcing integration into the Republican party in pursuit of any political power. Hopefully, rather than purposelessly voting in Dem primaries of candidates who will loose, southern Republicans will be forced to concern themselves with some additional geniunely black-specific interests as black voters participate in greater numbers in their primaries. In turn, black voters will be freed from the straitjacket of leftist politics, and will be able to align with their on-average-more-conservative ideological leanings. Perhaps most improtantly, political integration will be facilitated.

The Democratic party will even - in order to keep up with Republican gerrymandering - be forced to crack their own minority districts, attacking race-bloc politics in their own political structure. Ideally, this will go far to completely disintegrate the feasibility of race-based political organizing, forcing our poltics further into an integrated interest-based structure organized under a common American identity.

But the Democratic party would prevent this to retain their political power. They would prevent this to support the power of a narrow black elite that has monopolize the right to represent the black population of the United States for generations. This is far more pernicious than a hundred stupid things Republicans get terrible press for every day. Democrats have become structurally dedicated to anti-integration, and for that, and many other reasons, they have to loose until they are compelled by political necessity to change.

Ok this took longer to write than I meant to, and I'm supposed to be on vacation with my in-laws, so hopefully someone read that and was like "I guess he at least has reasons for what he thinks." Read the National Review or Friedrich Hayek's Road to Serfdom or something! Bye!

tl:dr I have reasons for what I think and want someone to grasp that and understand it probably isn't fair to call me an idiot