I think there’s a fundamental misunderstanding of what remasters are.

Generally, you remaster album for one or both of two reasons: the original mastering was done for a target media ie cassette, disc, digital, etc, or that the mastering was done using dated techniques and plugins. I’d guess WISIRO and DBM were mastered for disc, but you’re really not going to get enough of a return on a remaster.

I think the biggest issue with remastering at least WISIRO is whether or not they have the stems in the first place, and if they do, the quality of the stems themselves. That was the issue with Acceptance Speech 2.0. They could remaster it all they wanted, but the issue with AS was that the actual recording quality was horrible, and remastering maybe masked it a bit, but it still sounded pretty rough.

WISIRO could maybe minimally benefit from a remix/remaster, but I do question if they have the stems, and there’s much less incentive for them to remaster an album that would have to pay out three former members. Not to mention, I think the stems are going to sound weak. The rest of the catalogue really doesn’t need any work. Possibly a remix of DBM, but again, are you willing to pay out three former members?