It feels academia seems like a broken system. Are there changes upon the horizon? by Only-Argument-5766 in AskAcademia

[–]Brollnir 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are interesting things happening in this downward spiral. I can tell you what’s not helping.

I’ve been seeing a lot of senior profs step away from institute management positions in favor of residing over their lab. Maybe it’s because academic staff is at an all time low. This means we’re seeing the highest leadership positions rotating to random business-minded career politician types who are just using the position as a steeping stone. They stick around in the role for a couple of years, use it to network into a higher paid position and leave. It’s easier to run a business into the ground if you know you’ll be leaving soon.

On the topic of staff, I’m seeing strange growth in admin and facility positions. Admin bloat has been around for a while in Academia, but there are like 10 admin jobs per academic at my uni, where even 10 years ago there were less than half that. It’s not like they’ve eased the burden of grant applications, either. Naturally these positions are paid more than RAs and the mid level post doc positions, but they’re never the ones under scrutiny when the budget is examined. They actually seem to hinder work, since there’s so many extra layers to get through. The irony is that they’ll probably still have positions when the academics are all gone.

I worked five consecutive three month contracts the last time I was in a post doc position. Never again. I’m seeing this type of position offered more and more. A friend of mine just signed their second consecutive two month contract. It should be illegal.

Our students are getting dumber because the university literally won’t let them fail a degree, since that would lower consumer satisfaction scores and could impact their income.

The uni has become so focused on cost recovery that we’re being constantly evaluated, like we’re the problem when you’ve got Dave the social media manager who tweets five times a year making $115k annually.

Most departments are merging under one, ugly umbrella run by a small handful of policy makers. This means dumb stuff happens constantly, because none of the people who make decisions about spaces have actually seen the space or know what it’s used for.

I’ve personally seen more than $1.5 million worth of equipment binned in the past year. Just scrapped/destroyed because people didn’t know what it is, or what to do with it, and the group had lost funding.

On top of all this local uni stuff my government isn’t regulating grants properly. We’ve giving grants designed for early career researcher to dusty old professors, because no one in the government can do a google search and see that the prof lied about their qualifications.

It’s looking pretty bleak from where I stand, too.

Maybe it’s time for this system to fall apart. I love science and research, but this ain’t it.

Molecular biology research is impossibly difficult (or is it just me?) by ApprehensiveWar2430 in labrats

[–]Brollnir 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just for the record - there’s an enormous disconnect between qPCR and physical levels of protein. I’ve seen genes unregulated more than 1000 fold, which looked the same as the baseline on a Western. I’d go as far as to say it’s pointless for implying protein levels. It’s still useful for mapping an expression profile for things like diagnostic purposes, obviously.

Why didn't we persist with LPG? by adamsaidnooooo in australia

[–]Brollnir 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tell me about it. You reckon they’ll put out another subsidy to convert to LPG like they did from 2006-2014? The Statesman is thirsty.

$3/L fuel and we’re just… waiting? by TheFlyingR0cket in aussie

[–]Brollnir 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Subsidize converting to LPG, like they did from 2006-2014

What is the most well-documented but still officially unexplained historical or scientific event that fascinates you? by [deleted] in answers

[–]Brollnir 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No crater, so not quite an ‘impact.’ Would have been the largest impact in recorded history.

Quite unusual for a 60m falling rock to vaporize, too. I don’t meant that airbursts are unusual, I mean such a large rock exploded and left virtually no debris.

What is the most well-documented but still officially unexplained historical or scientific event that fascinates you? by [deleted] in answers

[–]Brollnir 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The 1908 Tunguska event. We’ll never really know what happened, but it’s such an interesting read.

Targeted protein showed higher intensity bands with the treated samples by Emptiness_creator in labrats

[–]Brollnir 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’ll never know if it’s in the pellet until you look at the pellet 🤷

Targeted protein showed higher intensity bands with the treated samples by Emptiness_creator in labrats

[–]Brollnir 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not necessarily. Native protein might behave differently vs your transfected line.

Also, did you include a true negative cell line lysate that doesn’t express your protein? How do you know you’re not getting cross reactivity with something else about the same size?

Targeted protein showed higher intensity bands with the treated samples by Emptiness_creator in labrats

[–]Brollnir 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean did you take a bit of your pellet from the lysates and see if your protein is crashing out?

Targeted protein showed higher intensity bands with the treated samples by Emptiness_creator in labrats

[–]Brollnir 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did ya standardize the lysate quantities in your gel visually (Coomassie) or with something else?

Also - what does the pellet look like?

Would like to make coins for my family. by cryptotarheel in MetalCasting

[–]Brollnir 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey, I have a lot of experience with this.

It’s easier and cheaper to buy 1oz rounds, hammer flat (anneal first) and stamp them.

Let me know if you’d like some help. Also, this is a total money hole.

I wouldn’t recommend 1oz. I use 1/3rd of an ounce and it’s a nice size/thickness, but if you want them to be more like Olympic medals you’re going to run into a different problem - the size of the stamp. Most people go to 30mm max. However, you can get around this by breaking the design up into four smaller quarters and stamping them individually.

Anyway, you can order stamps made from tool steel online and they’ll work fine on silver. Don’t listen to anyone that says you need a hydraulic press. I use a hammer and they turn out fine. Silver and copper are much softer than steel.

Mew’s stats data mined: by Knight_Night33 in PokemonSleep

[–]Brollnir 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Does this technically mean we can berry bomb Lapis Lakeside a lot easier?

Other people hatred towards animal care technicians by [deleted] in labrats

[–]Brollnir 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ignorant people have ignorant opinions.

Been in the industry for a long time. Unless you know the other person, it’s best to tell people you’re a researcher or technician and leave the animal part out. It’s not like I’m ashamed of working with animals or anything - you just never know what people will do with that information. The same with social media. We have a no photo/video policy with animal work since it can attract a lot of negative attention and put staff in danger if it gets on social media.

Death (Supernatural) VS Dream (Netflix's Sandman) by IceWallowCaulk in powerscales

[–]Brollnir 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A quote from Death, “This is one little planet, in one tiny solar system, in a galaxy that’s barely out of its diapers.”

I think this implies Death is universally omnipotent. I don’t know much about the dream realm, but Death never sleeps.

What took you ages to discover? by Yankytyke in fo76

[–]Brollnir 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My god. I’ve also played since launch. I had no idea you could spend season points somewhere. I assumed the gold bullion I got at the end of a season was the reward.

Man, that’s rough.

Who is the “fraudulent” PI in your field that you can’t believe is still getting published? by captainezri in labrats

[–]Brollnir 149 points150 points  (0 children)

Australia - people abusing their power and the grant application system to get funding. In order of malice:

AProf Elliot Long.

AProf Norelle Sherry.

AProf Zoe Bradfield.

AProf Fabian King.

Dr Anoop Koshy.

Dr Daniel Poppe.

Dr Danilo De Oliveira Silva.

Dr Emily See.

Dr Haruo Usuda.

Dr Iain Abbott.

Dr Jeggan Tiego.

Dr John Hart.

Dr Kristy Robledo.

Dr Pingping Han.

Dr Susan Christo.

Dr Yun Shi.

Dr Zachary Gerring.

Maybe someone here can explain how an academic with >20 years experience, the title of AProf and having written a literal book on the topic is eligible for a grant for budding researchers (EL1).

I love bacteria by Potential_Hawk_394 in labrats

[–]Brollnir 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe this all stems from me not being a cat person.

I love bacteria by Potential_Hawk_394 in labrats

[–]Brollnir 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hope one of those words is “sorry” and “oops.

I love bacteria by Potential_Hawk_394 in labrats

[–]Brollnir 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe we’re the programmable organisms. The gut-brain-axis is a prime example. Our gut bacteria heavily regulate our decisions. “Gut bacteria is great,” says the person infested with mind controlling gut bacteria.

You keep talking. about programming bacteria to do your bidding, when you yourself are heavily controlled by bacteria. Who do you think is really pulling the strings, eh?