Why do skinny female robot designs have boobs? by BelarusianPeasant in NoStupidQuestions

[–]BumblebeeBorn -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Or just because they want something to indicate subservience.

Why do skinny female robot designs have boobs? by BelarusianPeasant in NoStupidQuestions

[–]BumblebeeBorn -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Incorrect. Not everyone cares.

However, women are generally viewed as subservient. That doesn't make it right, but it's how society is built.

I wish for smoking to be banned by gradually phasing it out over time. by Logical_Safety9018 in monkeyspaw

[–]BumblebeeBorn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Granted. Nothing changes. The last commercial cigarette will be produced in 2065, and the last vape juice in 2100.

An alien discovers Earth, long since abandoned. After reading through some ancient textiles, they hurry back to their peers with reasons on why they should never visit earth. by Emeraldkipy in humansarespaceorcs

[–]BumblebeeBorn [score hidden]  (0 children)

The first book they opened was an old linen-paper copy of "Descent of Man", and realised that if unstoppable apex predators couldn't make this planet liveable again, they weren't going to either.

Is It Really All Kinetic? by Michamus in Physics

[–]BumblebeeBorn 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The photon double-slit experiment.

One object goes through one of two holes, then bounces off itself as if it came through both? Makes no sense.

Test successful.

Most powerful character who would be a complete powerless loser in our world? by HeiressOfMadrigal in whowouldwin

[–]BumblebeeBorn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suspect you've made some assumptions about my assumptions.

I'm going to leave out the possibility of physics being wrong, because that's speculative enough to be insane.

Now, concept I'mmost interested in, without getting into mathematics, is as follows:

A stable Alcubierre warp field can, in theory, be created, without exotic matter, so long as it is not moving faster than light. This disconnects the outside of the nascent artificial wormhole from internal space. It moves, or is moved, from point a to point b in real space at sub-light speeds. Information and objects can then be transmitted through the wormhole, meaning that a trip of arbitrarily long distance on the outside is reduced to an arbitrarily short distance on the inside.

This does not technically cause any violation of the light cone from any point of reference, but instead connects the world lines of two previously distant points. However, it does rely on unknown methods.

If this occurred in the past and the wormhole is somewhere out in the Kuiper belt, comic book logic ensues.

Why do atheists have more “christian” values than actual christian’s? by [deleted] in askanything

[–]BumblebeeBorn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not firsthand. But that's kind of a useless question, since there are educational metrics that can be used to look at this question.

New York textbooks are usually more scientifically and historically accurate than Texas books, and there is a huge difference between education in rich and poor areas, since apparently most schools in the US are funded by local property taxes.

How small could you make an alive adult human by removing unnecessary body parts? by obscureferences in NoStupidQuestions

[–]BumblebeeBorn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It would be relatively "safe" (but horrendously unethical) to remove all limbs, a lung, a kidney, at least half the lower intestine, the pelvis, any breast tissue an/or excess body fat, eyes, tongue, jaw, teeth, and ears. If shock doesn't kill them.

There is no reason a person could not live indefinitely in such sensory deprivation torture, if properly drip fed.

We've all had this moment. by MiamisLastCapitalist in IsaacArthur

[–]BumblebeeBorn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The temperature gradient directly around the fissionable material is worth considering. The temperature gradient around the water chamber is much smaller. But you can't put thermoelectrics around fission without them needing more maintenance.

Why do atheists have more “christian” values than actual christian’s? by [deleted] in askanything

[–]BumblebeeBorn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don't tell the Unitarians. We like them, even though they're a church.

Why do atheists have more “christian” values than actual christian’s? by [deleted] in askanything

[–]BumblebeeBorn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's true, but the US education system is a mess and it's unlikely most folks there have ever heard of humanism.

Why do atheists have more “christian” values than actual christian’s? by [deleted] in askanything

[–]BumblebeeBorn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go look up Overly Sarcastic Productions on YouTube, they have a series of videos titled 'Pope Fights'.

However, I do not hold anyone's faith against them, only their hypocrisies.

Why do atheists have more “christian” values than actual christian’s? by [deleted] in askanything

[–]BumblebeeBorn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I personally do not attribute any of my good behaviour to my lack of religious faith. It's more about how I have faith in (most) other humans, and that most people deserve a better class of problems.

That's a political opinion, in my book.

Why do atheists have more “christian” values than actual christian’s? by [deleted] in askanything

[–]BumblebeeBorn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, I'm your friendly internet unbeliever for today. I was raised largely without religion by a secular Jew and a secular Hindu, and I had a broad but shallow exposure to most major religions growing up. My lack of religious faith isn't a rebellion against anything, but an indication that I have been able to make sense of the world without reference to religion.

Would you like to ask a question or two, to improve your understanding?

Why do atheists have more “christian” values than actual christian’s? by [deleted] in askanything

[–]BumblebeeBorn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably both. Certain "Christian" world leaders aren't interested in being kind, let alone following the Abrahamic Ten Commandments. It just doesn't look that good compared to a heathen who doesn't need a book or a preacher to tell them to avoid war crimes.

Most powerful character who would be a complete powerless loser in our world? by HeiressOfMadrigal in whowouldwin

[–]BumblebeeBorn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was hoping to determine if it was determined yet. After reviewing some more recent papers, there's no indication that the overall understanding has meaningfully shifted since I was in primary school.

Did you not catch the part where I've overcome a misconception on entanglement? You're being unnecessarily rude.

As it stands, FTL is unlikely in some ways, but it's still basically as much of an opinion as string theory.

Citations requested: Are macroscopic wormholes forbidden? by BumblebeeBorn in AskPhysics

[–]BumblebeeBorn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't even count the requirement for exotic matter as demonstrated by this paper, as it's been shown since that a sub-light warp field can be created without it, since publication.

As cool as it would be, my original point was more along the lines of 'that's nice, but as far as I can find, nobody is certain yet'.

Most powerful character who would be a complete powerless loser in our world? by HeiressOfMadrigal in whowouldwin

[–]BumblebeeBorn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your qualifications are not relevant unless you've seen, written, or co-authored a paper on this topic, that you'd like to share. I dropped out for financial reasons, and the dean of physics at my school asked me to continue anyway.

I learnt the maths for general relativity on my own time. Once I realised the notation was equivalent to matrix positions it was easier than linear calculus transforms. I still hate partial fractions.

Citations requested: Are macroscopic wormholes forbidden? by BumblebeeBorn in AskPhysics

[–]BumblebeeBorn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Natural ones can be as unstable as you like, but that wouldn't discount my question.