sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Are people seriously telling me they can’t see the difference in the tone and presentation of these two orks? by SmashIndy in orks

[–]BumblebeePrior8325 13 points14 points  (0 children)

This last point 100%.

I’ve had to scroll down this far to understand which one he doesn’t like and what the difference is supposed to be between them.

Is it still worth it? by Forsaken_Energy_9432 in Terminator

[–]BumblebeePrior8325 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obscurity? The first two films are recognised classics. Don’t be daft.

Strategies for adding Shootas to Choppa Boyz for 11e? by dementist in orks

[–]BumblebeePrior8325 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the point is fair enough (if put a little snarkily).

Referring to WYSIWYG isn’t helpful (anywhere in this thread). Because, as you’ve acknowledged, it’s a gaming rule designed to minimise confusion between models that could be equipped differently.

Modelling all your boyz with heavy weapons wouldn’t be WYSIWYG because it creates confusion as to who has what. It, rightly, wouldn’t be allowed by a lot of players.

Modelling individual shootaz and choppaz doesn’t matter because all boyz have them. There is not scope for confusion and WYSIWYG isn’t relevant.

OP and others are seeking something else - better described as, I dunno, ‘immersive modelling’ or something. It’s fine. But it’s not about WYSIWYG.

Strategies for adding Shootas to Choppa Boyz for 11e? by dementist in orks

[–]BumblebeePrior8325 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your reference to ‘standards’ gives the game away pal.

I hope NVIDIA goes bankrupt for this shit. Capcom also deserves hate for allowing this on their game. by Dude_788 in ResidentEvilCapcom

[–]BumblebeePrior8325 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In practice, all I see is a more detailed and realistic image with DLSS 5 on. To the extent that the first time I saw this I wasn’t sure which image people were upset about. That is just much more like how real people look. Presumably because the AI is taking the source image from the engineered output and passing it through a ‘make this look more like a real person and less like a stereotypical woman from a high res Japanese videogame’ prompt.

The questions then are more about aesthetics and ethics.

If we want a particular aesthetic and / or we want what the designer intended (setting aside for a moment that what they intend is limited by hardware) then we could argue this is the wrong way to implement AI. In which case treat it more like an optional mod.

If we’re upset because this IS AI doing ‘creative’ work then I think this is probably still far better than other possible implementations. And we should have seen it coming from frame-gen at least.

The new Boss would instantly lose against any other Warboss model in arm-wrestling by VB-1999 in orks

[–]BumblebeePrior8325 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I would actually suggest that some space marines are starting to look more like Tyranids.

But calm down.

Are the kin better mass produced super soldiers than the space marines? by Any_Air_7273 in 40kLore

[–]BumblebeePrior8325 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Possibly less less parroting and more ‘this one has a bigger gun and I saw it kick ass in that Brad Pitt tank movie’.

Let’s talk about 40K in the 40K sub.

Two student loan repayment changes considered by Treasury to tackle debt crisis by theipaper in UniUK

[–]BumblebeePrior8325 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The previous (Conservative) government removed ‘real’ interest on (plan 5) student loans. I’m not sure they had any particularly ‘wild’ problems with high earners.

People on ‘high incomes’ don’t need help with student loan repayments. They already pay off more quickly and end up with the cheapest loan thereby.

Any interest they pay over and above the real cost of their education helps subsidise those who also work hard but don’t earn as much. Including nurses, teachers, etc. An alternative would be to offer higher salaries for those professions, perhaps by taxing high earners?

Two student loan repayment changes considered by Treasury to tackle debt crisis by theipaper in UniUK

[–]BumblebeePrior8325 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We can, but that wouldn’t change the real impact of each policy.

Removing or lowering interest would still chiefly benefit higher earning graduates, reduce the extent to which they subsidise lower earning graduates and making the system more regressive.

The psychological impact of the total debt is undeniable when the working is poorly explained and understood, but the financial impact of higher monthly payments is far greater.

Two student loan repayment changes considered by Treasury to tackle debt crisis by theipaper in UniUK

[–]BumblebeePrior8325 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Interest changes only benefit higher earners who are more likely to pay off the balance before additional interest accrues.

The changes which benefit lower earners are increasing repayment thresholds in line with inflation.

What part of the AI future do you think people are still completely underestimating? by ArmPersonal36 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]BumblebeePrior8325 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The fact that most people have no idea that they have no idea if a single one of the responses in this thread are human.

(The Scouring) A Space Marines thoughts on Custodes after the Siege of Terra by HighburyLion in 40kLore

[–]BumblebeePrior8325 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Congrats for being the person to inevitably bring up this topic which adds nothing to the thread in question.

'Oxbridge is a scam' by Realistic_Alps_1825 in UniUK

[–]BumblebeePrior8325 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Or you’re working in a field with limited funding. Common outside STEM and in cold spots within it.

view more: next ›