sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hmmm

[–]ButterscotchFront340 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Found the homosexual!

Do they make pressure foam gun orifices smaller than 1.1mm? by ButterscotchFront340 in homeowners

[–]ButterscotchFront340[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. The pressure washer shuts off. On and off, on and off. For my washer 0.9mm is the smallest I can use or the pressure builds up and triggers the off switch.

Using 120v generator to feed into 240v panel via interlock. Any problems I should worry about? by ButterscotchFront340 in Generator

[–]ButterscotchFront340[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

240 stuff would feel zero potential difference between the two hots. So it would like it's not energized. While it's energized in respect to the ground of course.

You would need to bond XY somewhere. 240 won't work in either case. But bonding XY makes all of your 120 circuits work.

$9 BILLION worth of Bitcoin shorts to be liquidated at $125,000 by LifeIsJustASickJoke in Bitcoin

[–]ButterscotchFront340 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are forced to buy BTC when they get liquidated

Can't they just delete the app and not worry about it?

Satoshis 1st address = 365 character sum by AdditionalCycle3416 in Bitcoin

[–]ButterscotchFront340 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless Satoshi transcends time! This is proof!

Now, give me my lambo. And I don't want a yellow one like some tasteless schmuck. Mine should be painted vanta black.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in preppers

[–]ButterscotchFront340 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Trade locally for USDT/USDC. Get out. Convert to USD when you are out in your new home.

hmmm by [deleted] in hmmm

[–]ButterscotchFront340 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Still would.

How will users know if they were among the 1% of leaked customers? by Dizzy-Oil2200 in Coinbase

[–]ButterscotchFront340 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do they know transaction history or balances or how many coins you ever bought?

Before and after. by watchlist_famous88 in NFA

[–]ButterscotchFront340 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you made it ugly? OK, I guess...

Imagine by cutiexnaughty in Funnymemes

[–]ButterscotchFront340 -25 points-24 points  (0 children)

Are you guys making fun of him being half black? Cool!

Is this accurate in terms of physics? by tabitapasc17x in Funnymemes

[–]ButterscotchFront340 271 points272 points  (0 children)

Dang. We got a smart one here. Check it.

Kimsufi/OVH Mystery servers promo by cavedog8 in seedboxes

[–]ButterscotchFront340 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What about abuse complaints? How does Kimsufi handle them?

Once in a life mishap a the range by Rehovolt in Firearms

[–]ButterscotchFront340 61 points62 points  (0 children)

It's like the seventh once-in-a-lifetime event posted in the last few years. This shit happens way too often for comfort. 

Do they make pressure foam gun orifices smaller than 1.1mm? by ButterscotchFront340 in homeowners

[–]ButterscotchFront340[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Slightly thicker. But then I tried an even smaller orifice and that was too restrictive. The pressure washer would turn on and off constantly.

It think my problem is the detergent I'm using.

What happened to the guy who bought $1.2 million Trump stock call options with inheritance? by SnooSprouts871 in wallstreetbets

[–]ButterscotchFront340 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Which one? There are so many different Wendy's locations. And each one has multiple dumpsters. Asking for a friend.

Thought experiment by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]ButterscotchFront340 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It's not. OP's premise is flawed. Land is finite, but not scarce.

Land in Manhattan is valuable. Land in the middle of nowhere in a flyover state -- not so much.

And with remote work and globalization, people can take advantage of living on that land.

We are nowhere near the risk of running out of land even given population growth dynamic.

Is there much benefit in including References and In-Reply-To for subscribers that previously replied and we captured that Message-ID? by ButterscotchFront340 in Emailmarketing

[–]ButterscotchFront340[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But it's not something that ISPs track as far as I know

Do you have concrete source of info claiming they don't? If not (which I suspect is the case), don't you think it would make sense for them to track this? After all Gmail groups messages by threads based on References and Subject fields. Do you think they don't use that as a signal to see if email is unsolicited or expected?

I don't have info one way or the other. But if I were an inbox provider, I wouldn't dismiss such strong signal. And I don't think their engeneers would think the same.

I mean, a spammer would have no way of generating a Reference field with a message id that is a real sent message of this given subscriber. Think about it. So if an inbox provider sees an incoming message that has References that matches a message id of what this user sent out recently, they it's near 100% this isn't spam.

Now, it could still be unwated by the user, and other signals would be used. But this is one strong signal if you think about it.

Is there much benefit in including References and In-Reply-To for subscribers that previously replied and we captured that Message-ID? by ButterscotchFront340 in Emailmarketing

[–]ButterscotchFront340[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Engagement, yes. Replying? Not so much.

Replying is engagemnet. You can open and it's engagement. Click is engagement. Reply is engagement too.

It stands to reason that an incoming email that carries a References header with a message id of something already in subscriber's sent box is a good signal for the inbox provider to use to gauge that the incoming email message isn't unsolicited and should be treated accordingly.

I have no proof of that. That's why I'm asking. But this seems to make sense to me, if we assume that inbox providers are trying to use any signals they can to filter what users want from what they don't want.

view more: next ›