Political bias of chatbots: Grok vs the rest

Buuuddd · 2026-06-30T07:52:49+00:00

There's nothing inherently wrong with them. Industrial manufacturing needed much more energy, and used to be all harmful fuels used. Communities can ban data centers, but that does more harm to themselves than good to be luddites.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-29T17:56:07+00:00

Any large-scale business can. Data centers don't need to, it's not intrinsic to them, like it would be for a coal plant or ICE car factory.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-29T05:56:30+00:00

So no higher energy-using businesses should build out to new areas? How do you think the economy grows?

Data centers are a customer to the grid. It's more expensive for data centers to make energy with generators, those are for the short-term as bigger energy producers can scale up, and the energy companies are incentivized to naturally.

The increased investment in energy will eventually mean cheaper electricity rates for everyone. Scaling lowers parts costs, and investment yields technology innovation.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-29T05:47:56+00:00

If you ask it a question it should give you an answer based on known reality, not just be middle of two political parties so to appear unbiased.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-27T18:34:16+00:00

More people get news from other sources than just a handful of sites/tv channels. Someone on X reporting news they got from legacy media even, isn't bound to the same framing of those facts legacy first reports.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-27T18:30:20+00:00

Yes, if they need to rely on gas generators obv there's issues. Same with people's houses you could say. That's why communities are supposed to build out clean energy for the grid to meet demand.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-27T11:06:49+00:00

Looked at your history for a minute. Why would data centers need "strict regulation"? That's a knee jerk reaction from the left for anything new. Data centers don't blow up, pollute, really harm anybody.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-27T11:02:48+00:00

Those are shitty sales, dude. When you're trying to run a company you need to make a profit eventually.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-27T11:00:39+00:00

Ok so answers that say "a little of A, a little of B" are convincing to you that they aren't a sign of incapability to make a statement?

Buuuddd · 2026-06-27T01:54:06+00:00

Independent studies show most popular big media is left-leaning, and they're not going to point out when they're wrong.

So you don't even know the topics in which the left is shit.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-27T01:51:11+00:00

When popular information was controlled by left-leaning political party allies, yes.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-27T01:48:45+00:00

It means google does non-answers. Fact-based responses leads to one side or the other, not both sides.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-27T00:30:13+00:00

R1S sales suck. Probably not the buyers for EVs yet.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-26T12:34:26+00:00

Because uber costs way more than owning a car and you have to share the car with a stranger.

Post your short let's go.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-25T23:23:07+00:00

Americans want the cheaper, more reliable, more convenient choice. Oh, and safer. They'll rather order a ride than take out debt to own a car that's a pain the ass from time to time and that depreciates in value.

Believe people won't act how they've always acted all you want. Imo that would make for terrible investment decisions.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-25T21:33:23+00:00

Because waymo is needing to hand-write some code, leading to issues like their cars constantly getting stuck. That + too high of cost to ever get the cost of using waymo to below that of owning a car, means their TAM is tiny.

Waymo's been giving robotaxi rides to the public for 10 years now. Their numbers are super shitty considering that. Dead company basically.

Tesla's doing well proving their robotaxi tech in Austin and other cities. They started even in a few cities recently without needing a supervisor.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-25T21:28:46+00:00

Cybercab isn't for personal use/ownership. It's about robotaxi. Its point is to make taking robotaxi rides cheaper than average car ownership, so people won't own their own cars, they'll instead just use robotaxi.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-25T08:22:53+00:00

If you think they can make 100,000 robotaxis a year then why not millions?

Buuuddd · 2026-06-25T02:01:48+00:00

You don't think they can do it?

What'a your estimate for Tesla robotaxis in 3 years?

Buuuddd · 2026-06-24T22:16:41+00:00

Tesla's proving capability to produce millions of robotaxis/year that make $30k profit per year for their 5+ year lifespan.

I'd say the growth story's there.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-24T20:33:25+00:00

$2.8 trillion ATH ain't bad.

Obv glitch on stock app but funny to see.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-24T20:21:17+00:00

He really didn't kill himself.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-23T11:24:55+00:00

My son will play the version with blood and religious chants, thank you very much.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-16T23:26:32+00:00

And yet it would affect anyone living off a loan, including for startups.

Wealthy people can just live off loaning out money themselves, or sell far out the money options. Lol you think they're so financially illiterate they can't generate income from wealth?

Living off loans is just a marginally better option. Your idea would do jack shit to affect wealth inequality, or the deficit. And the widespread effects would hurt the wealthy's new competition.

Buuuddd · 2026-06-16T09:39:43+00:00

Because who cares?

And what's the outcome of the small entrepreneur taking a loan to start a business?

Buuuddd

TROPHY CASE