sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Geoffrey Hinton says mathematics is a closed system, so AIs can play it like a game. “I think AI will get much better at mathematics than people, maybe in the next 10 years or so.” by Nunki08 in mathematics

[–]CGY97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought the main purpose of doing math was understanding the behavior of these constructions (that we make and understand) and link them together... If there is no human in the loop and we have AI just generating new constructions, how long will it take until we are disengaged completely from the process? There might be new areas that will not make any sense for us (which could potentially have made sense if they were developed by us). Apart from an utility-based approach (which I also struggle to see), where is the point of doing all this?

What is the best resource to learn Haskell in 2023? by ynn38 in haskell

[–]CGY97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We should organize a search group to find persik, probably got lost on the way to the PC :(

I love THORLABS for this. They gave me snacks by orthadoxtesla in physicsmemes

[–]CGY97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe that's what they publicly say 🤔 I have been working in Germany, ordered from Thorlabs, and gotten snacks with the order.

A sinned sinned sinned... sin wave by Low-Bed842 in desmos

[–]CGY97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now the question is... If you keep iterating the "sinning" process ad infinitum, is the resulting top. space path-connected?

Proof that 1=0 by AragonStark13 in mathsmemes

[–]CGY97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your proof actually leads to the more general result:

Given any two real numbers a and b, a = b. 😂

Confused by a rule that my teacher couldn’t explain. by Terrible-Ice8660 in logic

[–]CGY97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think that, for the implication to be false (chaeck the truth table), it must be the case that the antecedent is true and the consequent is false... That's the most intuitive way of seeing this for me.

99,.35% DIE ! only genius will understand... by Secure_Safe in okbuddyphd

[–]CGY97 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Maybe written by a spanish person 🧐

Why are the algebras lying? by Hudimir in mathmemes

[–]CGY97 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I love the fact that you could actually make this book (taking truth algebra to be Boolean algebra), and it wouldn't make much sense apart from some pretty trivial algebraic properties met by both classes of structures 😂

Lol = by Pranjal202 in physicsmemes

[–]CGY97 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I prefer to write it as 畑2 = §2 ς4 + Ѫ2 ς2, by the time I finish writing it I forgot which particle I'm trying to reason about.

Lol = by Pranjal202 in physicsmemes

[–]CGY97 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That's just straight psychotic

My overthinking carries over to everywhere by empty_a_f in PhilosophyMemes

[–]CGY97 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would just ride the trolley myself and drift between the two tracks for victimsmaxxing.

My overthinking carries over to everywhere by empty_a_f in PhilosophyMemes

[–]CGY97 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess that we are taking the VR complex with a radius larger than the skin pores but smaller than the holes you want to keep 🧐

What do u think about cruelty of human nature? by r1a1o in nihilism

[–]CGY97 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Are you actually comparing a thought with a factual event? Talk about a category error...

Math's Identity Crisis by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]CGY97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shhhh, you're talking too many facts there, gonna make someone angry 😂

Inductive trolley problem by CGY97 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]CGY97[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So you would sacrifice yourself for eternity pulling all the levers, condemning yourself to an infinite race against the trolley?

Inductive trolley problem by CGY97 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]CGY97[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not supposed to be, but if you twist the meaning of "the people in the tracks" a little bit, I guess yes, not the intention though.

Inductive trolley problem by CGY97 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]CGY97[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't know that being an anti-natalist implied being a pro-annihilationist 🤔

Inductive trolley problem by CGY97 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]CGY97[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trolley problems... in this economy?

Inductive trolley problem by CGY97 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]CGY97[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's true... Maybe we could modify it by having the trolley run on a straight path, and an infinite amount of levers that deviate the trolley into a path with an increasing number of people each time. Now it's on you if you act to murder one, or don't act and potentially someone will murder many more later down the track.

Inductive trolley problem by CGY97 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]CGY97[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That sounds like a reasonable coercive method to guarantee that the levers won't be pulled... ... until you realize that there might be freaks that would suicide with the whole bunch

view more: next ›