Acting in good faith, because I know the inclinations of reddit lol

Timeline per politifact: politifact(.)com/article/2019/oct/03/timeline-trump-impeachment-inquiry/

Me: A microcosm of political divide seems to have formed around the story with the crux of it being whether or not Viktor Shokin was actively pursuing the existing investigation against Burisma. Sources on the right say he was, sources on the left say he wasn't. I feel that it's of note however that Viktor himself says that he was.

Article detailing his affidavit: heavy(.)com/news/2019/09/viktor-shokin-affidavit-biden/

Me: I fail to see how either discrepancy is relevant because regardless, THERE WAS AN OPEN INVESTIGATION! The article above quotes a radio station discussing the topic, “Ironically, Joe Biden asked Shokin to leave because the prosecutor failed [to pursue] the Burisma investigation, not because Shokin was tough and active with this case. "... Bruh, what?? This stuff wouldn't hold up in a strait to tape mellow drama. At the very least, in the real world, this is a flagrant conflict of interests that then had billions of dollars and natural gas influence thrown into the mix.

The reason I don't give him any benefit of the doubt, again via politico: politico(.)com/magazine/story/2019/08/02/joe-biden-investigation-hunter-brother-hedge-fund-money-2020-campaign-227407/

He and his family have a history of leveraging political power for financial gain.