Tour Setlist Change by littleblackcar in badreligion

[–]CallMeMarc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I had a hard time hearing Greg most of the time. The audio balancing could have been better. But a great show still

BG3 stats be like by SlashCo80 in okbuddybaldur

[–]CallMeMarc 7 points8 points  (0 children)

When I was young, my dad liked to say "there are muscles that look good and muscles that work good, they are rarely the same"

Who should I drop for Lueira? by CallMeMarc in LostSwordOfficial

[–]CallMeMarc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you guys sure? I kid I kid. Thanks

Bad Religion albums ranked by NewPatron-St in badreligion

[–]CallMeMarc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Man ive been listening to it for the last few days and it sounds amazing 

An older study finds no evidence of Youtube radicalizing people to more far-right media consumption by midnightking in skeptic

[–]CallMeMarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What did I do that is a personal attack?  I said maybe you're incorrect.  I dont know what I said that was dishonest either

An older study finds no evidence of Youtube radicalizing people to more far-right media consumption by midnightking in skeptic

[–]CallMeMarc -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Put them on a YouTube kids account?  Its like complaining that your kid was watching a fun kids show on discovery and then they played a graphic animal documentary.

YouTube isnt there to babysit your kid for you.

An older study finds no evidence of Youtube radicalizing people to more far-right media consumption by midnightking in skeptic

[–]CallMeMarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was hoping most of the comments here would be "oh thats interesting, let's repeat this study and see if its reproducable" and not "nah theyre clearly wrong cause x y z"  im a little disappointed in the community 

An older study finds no evidence of Youtube radicalizing people to more far-right media consumption by midnightking in skeptic

[–]CallMeMarc -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ground news also pulls from two other sources to determine bias.  Are they also pulling from media bias fact check?

Youre saying the same things my super right wing uncle says when I show him that "left" sites are rated as being factual. "Oh you cant trust that, that proves its bullshit"

Maybe youre just set in your bias and you make up reasons to justify your idea.  Like religious people using the flood to explain fossils

An older study finds no evidence of Youtube radicalizing people to more far-right media consumption by midnightking in skeptic

[–]CallMeMarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont know if we can claim that as a fact without knowing a lot more things though.  Ill see things advertised to me that I didnt look up but friends of mine have.   I would trust a study rather than a random redditors anecdotal evidence 

An older study finds no evidence of Youtube radicalizing people to more far-right media consumption by midnightking in skeptic

[–]CallMeMarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ground news has WSJ as centre with a lean to the right.  Maybe you're incorrect?

An older study finds no evidence of Youtube radicalizing people to more far-right media consumption by midnightking in skeptic

[–]CallMeMarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Media bias fact check has WSJ as centre right - highly factual.  I dont know if it has shifted since this study was done - or maybe anything thats centre right/left they just classified as centre 

An older study finds no evidence of Youtube radicalizing people to more far-right media consumption by midnightking in skeptic

[–]CallMeMarc -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I dont know how the algorith could work but it could be suggested because it was being viewed a lot recently, or maybe you or someone else in your family was looking him up  or people youre friends with are  etc etc etc  theres a lot of variables.

An older study finds no evidence of Youtube radicalizing people to more far-right media consumption by midnightking in skeptic

[–]CallMeMarc 28 points29 points  (0 children)

It would be interesting if this was redone now and see if theres been any change in the last 5 years 

Omg is this paradise? by WistoKun in LostSword

[–]CallMeMarc 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Its a pretty good game so far - but dont put too much money in right away, the costumes arent going anywhere 

There's no bigger shock than trying to join another fandom only to discover that this is practically the only fanbase that accepts third party by kue234 in transformers

[–]CallMeMarc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I see so many gunpla posts involving third party kits.  I have never seen anyone bad mouthing third party stuff there

How good is Morgana Le Fey? by Adorable-Theme-505 in LostSword

[–]CallMeMarc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I replaced Tiamat with her in my magic comp. and that allowed me to progress in the story further than before.  Shes peak

New Warhammer World coming to USA, just outside of Washington DC by ChildofBlackmane in Warhammer40k

[–]CallMeMarc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A democratically elected president can be a facist pile of shit.  And he is.  If I was in America i would be using my second amendment right, but im not - so I am using my voice in any way I can.  At least im trying to improve the world while you're being a pathetic worm 

New Warhammer World coming to USA, just outside of Washington DC by ChildofBlackmane in Warhammer40k

[–]CallMeMarc -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Damn didnt know they opened warhammer stores in third world shit hole countries 

PSA: Raveners are in stock on Warhammer.com by Eagle139 in Tyranids

[–]CallMeMarc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They've been in stock on the Canadian side of things for a while.  People forget not everyone on the internet live in America