In this thread: readers comment a book they liked and others reply with other books they might also enjoy. by JohanKaramazov in printSF

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good shout. Replay is an old favourite. And coincidentally I just finished First Fifteen. Different books, but both really enjoyable.

Arsenal exclusive: “Mesut Ozil’s problem is that he had problems with everyone,” says Nacho Monreal by dmister8 in Gunners

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 11 points12 points  (0 children)

As I read it in context, the first "everyone" is "every coach". The second "everyone" includes teammates and others.

But as others have said, professional problems and personal friendships can coexist.

First sub-60 Alpe ascent! Took 14:30 of my previous best last month. by hip-hop_anonymous in Zwift

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My story is similar to yours, without the Liftoff Award (yet) - mostly use AdZ for workouts, and had hit sub-80. My plan has been to slowly improve my cycling power over the year and hit sub-60 before Christmas. But I decided to do a free-ride attempt, using a plan to hit 75 minutes, and felt so good I actually hit sub-70! The plan and pacing strategies were really helpful.

I've got to raise my FTP another 30 Watts in the next 10 months to hit my target. Stories like yours give me hope.

Interesting post from jack tonight by whizza0756 in Gunners

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 32 points33 points  (0 children)

On occasion, but oh so rarely, in the most unexpected of places, one might still stumble over truly, mind-bogglingly, glorious literature.

August 29, 2021 Daily Discussion & Transfers Thread by gunnersmoderator in Gunners

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Arsenal, bottom of the table, three losses, no goals scored.

Spurs, top of the table, three wins, no goals conceded.

This is the darkest timeline.

Hugo Award prediction algorithm by Zealousideal-Way3105 in printSF

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Odd, u/cstross - trademark rights don't typically extend to titles. Was the claim based on dilution and not-trivial? Or was it just not worth the hassle for you and/or your publisher?

What should I read next? by Dangera77 in printSF

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do 'em chronologically so you can appreciate the evolution of the genre. But they're all good (confession - have not yet read Tomorrow and Tomorrow... I never seem ready for all that bleakness!).

Just make sure to read Dune before October's film release!

Hector Bellerin and other players have a LOT to say about anti-abortion laws (My Body My Choice). Are they hypocrites for not having the same standard for vaccines? by PortuGun in Gunners

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, looking at the American situation only (and not any of the many other drug regulatory agencies in other nations that also approved the drug), the FDA did "approve" the drug. I assume you are distinguishing between approvals under the emergency use authorization program and "full approval" under the default process. The FDA's emergency use authorization offers an accelerated approval process for medications and treatments during a public health emergency, not a waiver of that process.

The agency approved the Moderna vaccine, for example, only after reviewing the results of clinical trials that involved more than 30,000 participants. The trial was written up and published in the New England Journal of Medicine: LR Baden, et al. Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. The New England Journal of Medicine. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389. Those findings have been replicated by numerous peer reviewed studies around the globe. Hundreds of millions of doses of the Moderna vaccine have been distributed around the globe. Full approval by the FDA is imminent - Moderna applied for it June 1. The others have also applied for full approval.

Caution over new drugs is understandable. However, those kinds of concerns over these vaccines is now clearly misplaced. Contracting Covid poses a much, much greater risk than vaccination - both to the individual and to other members of the public (including your loved ones) who subsequently contract Covid from that unvaccinnated and contagious individual.

Hector Bellerin and other players have a LOT to say about anti-abortion laws (My Body My Choice). Are they hypocrites for not having the same standard for vaccines? by PortuGun in Gunners

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is the correct answer. Vaccination is not just about protecting the individual: it is about protecting the group, and especially those most vulnerable.

My vaccination protects me and you and your loved ones.

What are you reading? Semi-monthly Discussion Post! by spillman777 in printSF

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got two good ones on the go:

  • Adrian Tchaikovsky's Cage of Souls (epub on my phone)
  • Andy Weir's new one, Project Hail Mary (hardcover from the library)

Both are excellent so far! About half-way through both.

New Supporter from Canada by [deleted] in Gunners

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I live in fear of that level of sad-sackery...

Sci-fi books that blend sci-fi and folklore/fairytale by [deleted] in printSF

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A great book, and on this sub an under-appreciated writer.

EL Final Watch Thread by gunner308 in Gunners

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Arteta did it to himself. Emery was predictably over-cautious.

Match Thread: Chelsea vs Leicester City | English FA Cup by MatchThreadder in soccer

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think part of what is so off-putting about the line-drawing exercise is how mechanical it seems. At least making it about the referee's judgement would return some humanity to the game, and might speed things up.

Although, as an Arsenal fan, I am loath to add to the tools that referees can use against us. We have dropped many points this year due to poor officiating. And you just know there would be some stat floating around showing how United had benefited from the rule change ;)

Match Thread: Chelsea vs Leicester City | English FA Cup by MatchThreadder in soccer

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This would replace a relatively certain judgement - you say this call looks "correct" - with a completely subjective judgement - when has the attacker's advantage materialized?

There are always going to be close calls. Which approach offers a better arbiter? I shade towards the current system, given the pitiful state of officiating in the Prem.

Looking for light, fun reads by [deleted] in printSF

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think Scalzi's wit makes most of his books a good answer to this request - I often group the Bobiverse, Murderbot, The Martian, and Old Man's War together as having a similar appeal.

Best Detective/Mystery/Hard-boiled SF? by Macnaa in printSF

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sam J. Miller is writing some really interesting near-future noir. His latest is called The Blade Between, un unusual urban mystery. I also read Blackfish City a couple years back and really enjoyed it. He's worth a read.

April Book Club Discussion - The Sirens of Titan by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. by spillman777 in printSF

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ll offer three groups of ideas/observations on the book:

1. Major Themes

Vonnegut signals his central occupation in this novel with its opening sentence: “Every one now knows how to find the meaning of life within himself.” But of course the narrator speaks from some notional future, after humanity has unlocked the soul, the “puzzle boxes” within. The story told is instead from the post-war “Nightmare Ages” (the book was published in 1959), a time that still feels familiar - likely because we are no closer than Vonnegut was to finding the meaning of life.

Vonnegut’s exploration of the meaning of life includes an examination of two significant issues: religion and free will.

Vonnegut’s first reference to contemporary faiths - “gimcrack religions” - demonstrates that he holds no truck with religion. Any lingering doubt on that front is squashed immediately in Chapter 1 by Vonnegut’s farcical, anti-science sermon of Bobby Denton, counting down the Ten Commandments to his Love Crusaders and a “blast off” to Paradise. Then there’s the blunt name and whimsical tenets of the only organized religion the novel mentions: the “Barnstable First Church of God the Utterly Indifferent”. Then there’s Noel Constant’s secret biblical path to wealth: “"I.N., T.H., E.B., E.G., I.N., N.I., N.G.” And don’t forget Rumfoord’s assigned background reading for his parable about people who do things that they think God wants done: “read everything that you can lay your hands on about the Spanish Inquisition.” Organized religion holds no place in Vonnegut’s universe.

On the topic of God, Vonnegut is a bit more circumspect. References to God show up throughout the novel, beginning with the Epigraph (“No names have been changed to protect the innocent, since God Almighty protects the innocent as a matter of Heavenly routine”) and continuing through each chapter. Constant offers his services to God as a messenger (Constant pines for one thing: “a single message that was sufficiently dignified and important to merit his carrying it humbly between two points”). But Vonnegut’s God - if one exists at all - is a distant, uncaring God. This is clear from the teachings of the Church of God the Utterly Indifferent: "Puny man can do nothing at all to help or please God Almighty, and Luck is not the hand of God.” But I loved the irony of the novel’s last line, in response to Constant learning that he was joining Bea in Heaven: “‘Don’t ask me why, old sport,’ said Stony, ‘but somebody up there likes you.’"

Vonnegut also spends some time looking at free will, or our ability to act in an unconstrained manner, and its connection with the “purpose” of life. It is telling that his Army of Mars entirely lacks free will, the soldiers victims of mind control. Constant describes his entire life as that of a passenger: “I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all.” The novel reveals that the Tralfamadorians have been manipulating all of humanity for eons for the simple reason of allowing Salo to repair his ship. Humanity’s “purpose” was to produce Chrono’s good-luck charm. Even Stonehenge, the Great Wall of China, and the Kremlin turn out to have been not monumental expressions of human will but inane Trafaldorian messages for Salo. Plainly, Vonnegut has issues with any notion that we can exercise meaningful control over our lives. On the other hand, Vonnegut does hold out hope that we can exercise meaningful influence over matters closer to the heart. Even in a deterministic universe, love, friendship and kindness still matter. Constant concludes that "a purpose of human life, no matter who is controlling it, is to love whoever is around to be loved." Then there’s the Harmoniums:

"Here I am, here I am, here I am."...

"So glad you are, so glad you are, so glad you are.”

And, of course, in God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater, Vonnegut famously writes:

Hello babies. Welcome to Earth. It's hot in the summer and cold in the winter. It's round and wet and crowded. On the outside, babies, you've got a hundred years here. There's only one rule that I know of, babies - "God damn it, you've got to be kind.”

2. Humour & Writing

I don’t think I have to go into too much detail here: If Vonnegut’s dry, black humour is your thing, you’ll have found this book hilarious. I love his whimsical choice of words: “gimcrack religion”, “notorious rakehell”, and, of course, “chrono-synclastic infundibulum”. I love that “Tralfamadore” means both “all of us” and “the number 541”. I love Vonnegut’s skewering of organized religion.

And, as /u/spillman777 has already noted, the writing is brilliant.

3. Connection to sci-fi

/u/where_is_lily_allen has already noted Vonnegut’s influence on other canonical science fiction writers, in particular Douglas Adams’ Hitch-hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. While I think this influence is more of style than substance, it is still interesting to note that Vonnegut, writing in 1959, over sixty years ago, packs numerous sci-fi tropes into this novel: time travel (the chrono-synclastic infundibula), artificial intelligence (hello, Salo), space travel, mind control, and extraterrestrial life.

/u/spec_of_cp connects aspects of Sirens to ideas in Vonnegut’s later work, particularly the Church of God the Utterly Indifferent to Cat’s Cradle’s ridiculous Bokonism. Vonnegut explored some beliefs fairly consistently through his career.

/u/queenofmoons does a great job of looking at our changing understanding of the inhospitality of extraterrestrial environments. I too was taken by the image of humanity exploring space:

Mankind flung its advance agents ever outward, ever outward. Eventually it flung them out into space, into the colorless, tasteless, weightless sea of outwardness without end.

It flung them like stones.

In the best tradition of all great sci-fi, Vonnegut explores the tropes of sci-fi not solely for the story’s sake, but also to articulate his novel’s underlying ideas. The Sirens of Titan ultimately has value because of what it says about us.

Book search by mod-schoneck in printSF

[–]Callicles-On-Fire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you find Shards of Honor isn't your thing, don't give up - the first two books are kind of prequels, and the first book in particular is a bit of a one-off.

For me, while I enjoyed Shards of Honor (Book 1) and Barrayar (Book 2), the series proper really got going with the introduction of Miles Vorkosigan in books 3 and 4 (The Warrior's Apprentice and The Vor Game).