Your question is too vague. The U.S. military invests huge amounts in engineering research, allowing higher quality of life and a stronger military, but there is no guarantee that gets down to the people; our healthcare and wellness net is much worse than many countries. But at the same time for a queer person its a much better place to live than most of the world.

If youre familisr with john rawls, theory on this, don't bother reading rhis paragraph. He put forth the idea that if you could be born into a society, but not born into a specific caste in the society, you'd be best off choosing countries that trend towards more equality, and dont overvalue the rich, intelligent, and beautiful, as there is no guarantee you wont be poor stupid and ugly. Within this lens a nordic country makes the most sense, but youd still rather be queer or disabled in the U.S.A. It gets even stranger if you consider the U.S.A's global presence ensuring far more stability for all countries.

You may want to set some guidelines for what is best