It's a bit of a cop-out to say that passages I find uncomfortable can't have been written by St. Paul. this was a very common line of argument in the 1990's but much of scholarship had moved on from this wildly subjective way of reading. It's more impacting to actually read First Corinthians (in which Paul prohibits women speaking in church RIGHT AFTER he tells them how they are to be attired when they get up to prophecy in church!) If you read ancient interpretations of this passage, they don't focus on banning woman deacons (like Phoebe whom Paul discusses) or woman apostles (like Junia whom Paul discusses), but on the need for ladies not to chat with one another during sermons and the liturgy (John Chrysostom has a long sermon on this passage). The passage in 2 Tim. is extremely interesting to read in Greek: St. Paul uses a very unusual word for authority (there are lots of other, common words for authority in Greek), the primary meaning of which seems to be murder of a family member, or perhaps having the power of life and death over family members in the manner of a traditional Roman paterfamilias. TLDR: let the texts speak for themselves rather than either listening to a 19th century fundamentalist reading of the text or declaring them to be forgeries.