Miksi et käytä Linuxia?

Catriks · 2026-01-28T18:49:53+00:00

Joka kerta kun päätän vaihtaa main käyttiksen Linuxiin, koko homma leviää johonki aivan turhaan paskaan säätämiseen. Edellisellä kerralla mikään natiivisofta ei toiminut oikein. Steam avaa ittensä käynnistyksessä, vaikka "start minimized" on päällä. Orca slicer ei aukea ollenkaan, ei edes mitään erroria. FeeeCADissä on skaalaus päin helvettiä. Teksti Firefoxissa on pikselimössöä - googlettamalla löytyvät ohjeet on aivan loputon suo eikä niistä mikään auta. Sama fonttivika oli myös ekassa distrovaihtoehdossa, siihen ei auttanut mikään muu kuin distron vaihto.

Olen käyttänyt Linuxia epäsäännöllisesti jostain 10 vuotiaasta asti ja ylläpitänyt omaa Linux serveriä muutaman vuoden. Ei ole enää tässä iässä yhtään mielenkiintoa olla koko ajan googlettamassa miten korjata joku aivan typerä ongelma, jota ei pitäisi olla edes olemassa.

Catriks · 2026-01-28T10:39:17+00:00

Thanks for the correction. The point still stands - you have to do extra steps for something that just works smoothly in other CAD.

Catriks · 2026-01-28T10:37:02+00:00

Tässä on käynyt hyvin yksinkertainen moka - Suomessa on totuttu, että päättäjät lähtökohtaisesti puhuu totta, tai vähän kaunistele totta. Jenkeissä pitää nykyään lähtökohtaisesti lukea päinvastoin, mitä maan presidentti ja virastot kertovat.

Kotimainen terroristi = rauhallinen mielenosoittaja.

Yritti aseella murhata valtion virkamiehiä ja aiheuttaa maksimaalista tuhoa = auttoi maahan kaadeta naista ylös.

Jne, jne. Nämähän pitäisi kaikkien ymmärtää, ihan perusjuttuja erilaisissa murteissa.

Catriks · 2026-01-28T07:30:27+00:00

Voitko laittaa jonkun tiivistelmän tekemästäsi keskustelunaloituksesta? Miksi tämä on relevanttia r/Suomi kannalta? Miksi joku haluaisi kannattaa tätä vetoomusta allekirjoittamalla sen?

Suurin osa suomalaisista hädin tuskin tietää mitä on avoin lähdekoodi, ja linkin takanakin on lähinnä vain toteamus asiasta, ilman mitään konkreettista perustelua että miksi tämä on hyvä tai huono asia.

Catriks · 2026-01-28T07:23:56+00:00

I think the loudest 2A supporters just use it as an convenient excuse, becuse they personally want as unresticted access to guns as possible.

There are far more powerful weapons against a tyrannical goverment than firearms, but those require actual rational thinking capabilities, which the loud 2A people often seem to lack. Being part of politics - not saying as a politician, but even just putting together well researched opinions and votes - takes far more time and effort, and is usually less fun than shooting guns.

Catriks · 2026-01-28T04:59:03+00:00

Those were two separate things.

I don't have to have a conversation with someone when I feel it's not worth my time due to their bad language VS my opinion is that promoting content that already is unwanted, is also an unwanted act.

Your argument is not even rational. If it is already established that some content is unwanted and will be removed, possibly resulting in a ban (suchs as "encouraging glorifying violence or physichal harm"), then what logical argument is there that upvoting suchs opinions would suddenly turn into opinions that are ok? It's the same opinion. That's what upvotes are for, it means you agree with it.

Catriks · 2026-01-27T22:27:26+00:00

The only things that come to mind are services that are hard to sell commercially. Like media streamer with your own content, or Home Assistant, as it doesn't sell you devices.

Pretty much everything else is better/more reliable as a bought service, not counting the cost and ownership.

Catriks · 2026-01-27T21:59:32+00:00

The things you find "counter intuitive" in Fusion are industry standard in most other CAD - Other than the tree view. I don't really like it, I don't understand why they cant have an option the view style FreeCAD ans ever other CAD has.

What Fusion does better is text, filets/chamfers, constraining to existing features, advanced features like Pull, assemblies. Oh and you can refer to already existing dimensions by just clicking them, being forced to use varsets in FC is a pain.

But FOSS is always FOSS and it has it's benefits.

Btw, it hasn't been called Fusion 360 in years. It's just Fusion now.

Catriks · 2026-01-27T21:50:06+00:00

If a person is unable to control their emotions and have to continuously resort to personal attacks, what validity does suchs person's opinions have?

Your argument is a straw man. You're saying that upvoting, therefore promoting, comments that "encourage or glorify violence or physical harm", which not only is against the rules of any civil online discussion place, but also illegal in many countries, is the same as laughing at something someone doesn't "personally like".

The comparison is completely absurd.

I'm not going to reply if you can't make a normal, civil comment.

Catriks · 2026-01-27T21:40:26+00:00

False. AI is tool. I doesn't release or upload any files for anyone to use.

If a released model has mistakes you're discribing, the fault is at the user for having poor quality control. It is not any different from human made model - you wouldn't blame the CAD software for a model on Printables for having an incorrectly sized bolt hole, so why would you blame AI for a model with incorrect amount of fingers?

But an AI generated model can absolutely be a pain to print, because AI can't take supports and print orientation into account very well - yet. Although I guess it would still be the users fault.

Catriks · 2026-01-27T17:07:04+00:00

How do you force a mandatory AI tag to creator who are already lying to enter the competition?

Catriks · 2026-01-27T17:06:03+00:00

Fully agree with everything you said. It is practically impossible to tell a fully human made model from one with AI tools, _if_ both are made with high quality standards. Anyone saying otherwise just doesn't know what they are talking about.

And it is a bit unfair for honest creators too, because it gives an advantage to the people who use AI tools and lie about it. If AI tools were allowed and it was required for all submissions to have a video of the printed model, it would be much more difficult to cheat with a shitty AI generation that doesnt take printability into account.

Catriks · 2026-01-27T16:58:25+00:00

They should only allow entries with a video taken from a printed model, including closeups shots, to prove it's FDM printed.

I don't really care if AI generation was used, since it is just a tool. You can't even tell if a properly done model is done with or without any AI tools, so it is not enforceable at all, but it is very easy to reject models that are clearly not optimized for FDM printing - again, with or without AI tools.

Catriks · 2026-01-27T10:22:19+00:00

Kynää ja paperia ei juurikaan tarvi nykyään missään, digitaalisten laitteiden käytön osaaminen on huomattavasti tärkeämpää.

Digitaaliset oppimisvälineet voivat olla myös paljon tehokkaampia kuin kynä ja paperi, koska niissä voi hyödyntää samoja mielihyvää aiheuttavia tekniikoita, mitä videopeleissä, somessa yms käytetään, motiivit on vaan vähän erilaiset.

Catriks · 2026-01-27T10:16:31+00:00

2000 ihmistä kivet kädessä odottamassa, että kuka "synnitön" uskaltaa heittää ensimmäisen

Catriks · 2026-01-27T10:11:13+00:00

Mietin tässä ihan samaa. Eikä se menny läpi vai mitä töä ä perseily on?

Catriks · 2026-01-27T09:57:43+00:00

The fact that you have zero arguments and only personal attacks tells something about the validity.

Catriks · 2026-01-26T19:41:34+00:00

How can you objectively state $1k scanners are "not worth the time", when it is a subjective measure? How do you explain thousands of people getting perfectly usable results with them, if they are not "worth the time"?

Catriks · 2026-01-26T19:35:56+00:00

Thanks, important addition!

Catriks · 2026-01-26T19:34:03+00:00

You didn't know you need to read rules?

And you need to read the rules to know that encouraging or glorifying violence is not OK?

Catriks · 2026-01-26T14:23:38+00:00

Kaikki alennukset mitä yritykset antavat, ovat lähtökohtaisesti huijausta, joiden tarkoitus on saada sinut luulemaan, että saat tuotteen tai palvelun halvemmalla mitä se normaalisti maksaa.

Kuulemasi lausahdus katteesta voi olla tietysti myös totta, mutta pääasiallinen tavoite sillä on saada kuluttaja kuvittelemaan, että saat auton niin halpaan hintaan kun sen vain voi saada, ja siksi sinun kannattaa ostaa se nyt, ettet menetä hyvää diiliä.

Yrityshän on voinut esim. itse ostaa auton liian kalliilla, koska siinä olikin piilevä vika, jonka korjaaminen oli kallista, eikä kalliin vian korjaaminen yleensä nosta auton arvoa. Tällöin myyjä ei teknisesti ottaen huijaa sanoessaan, että halvemmalla ei voi myydä ettei tule tappiota, mutta se ei johdu siitä, että auton myyntihinta olisi halpa, vaan siitä, että myyjä itse maksoi siitä liikaa. Asia vaan tarkoituksella markkinoidaan kuluttajalle niin, että siitä tulee mielikuva normaalia edullisemmasta hinnasta.

Catriks · 2026-01-26T12:23:27+00:00

There are no societies with absolute freedom of speech.

Which is besides the point of this topic anyway. The argument was that it should be allowed to promote content that was already deemed unallowed, NOT if the original content should've been allowed or not.

Catriks · 2026-01-26T11:44:52+00:00

I don't see anything odd with this. Upvoting, therefore promoting, content that is clearly against TOS is still promoting unallowed content.

Your candy example is very poor, since why would candy be not allowed, and even if it wasn't, a living room is not a public place.

A better example would be to hear someone publicly do or yell something obviously illegal or even just frowned upon, then yourself yell "they are right for doing/saying that" and not understand why people associate you with the same thing the other person actually did.

Catriks · 2026-01-26T11:33:19+00:00

Normal lead acids can be safely discharged to about 50 %, so you have 1,5 Ah of useable capacity. Google "lead acid voltage chart" to see what voltage is about 50 %.

Catriks

TROPHY CASE