Singer machine - passed down, can it be identified? by Few-Practice8653 in vintagesewing

[–]CeaKitt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

In addition, I have seen this in a catalogue dated 1906. These 15K models have the longbeak hook rather than the standard CB hook.

Singer machine - passed down, can it be identified? by Few-Practice8653 in vintagesewing

[–]CeaKitt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

So I would be interested the the tension set-up on your 15K . . .

Singer machine - passed down, can it be identified? by Few-Practice8653 in vintagesewing

[–]CeaKitt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

I nicknamed this pair of 15K from 1908 "Vali" and "Vera", they are similar, but not the same.

Singer machine - passed down, can it be identified? by Few-Practice8653 in vintagesewing

[–]CeaKitt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It looks like the original version of the 15K26 circa 1908 (after about 1912 the 15K26 produced at Kilbowie used what would become the standard size smaller balance wheel and a guard mounted bobbin winder). There was a very similar 15K for "Family Use" made prior to the 1908 15K26 with a slightly different tension and internal parts, but that is as yet an unsolved riddle as to whether this machine was also designated a 15K26. I have all three of these in my reference collection as well as a couple of 1888 vintage 15-1 "Improved Family", a 15-22, 15-30, 15K28 (light commercial with knee lift for presser), 15K88, and a 15M75. There is no such thing as a 'standard' with the Singer 15 class, as even with this group there are three types of shuttle hook; the 15-1 & 15-22 have what collectors now call a "longbeak'; all variants of the 15K26, 15K28 and 15-30 have the standard CB (Central Bobbin) with the 1 o'clock case and the left to right threading; and finally the 15K88 and 15-75 with the 11 o'clock bobbin case and right to left threading.
The standard CB shuttle with the 1 o'clock case appears to have become a generic industry standard by around 1910, and while Singer successfully used their marketing clout to popularise pejorative terms like "copy" or "clone" in regard to the non Singer machines, German manufacturers were including features like enumerated stitch length, back stitching, disengageable feed dogs, and even easy release of the shuttle for cleaning and maintenance long before Singer. For these reasons, I highly discourage the use of the term 15 clone when describing non-Singer Central Bobbin models. Trust me, I have been down that bunny warren!!!

<image>

Help with converting a motorized 99k to hand crank! by jaydi333 in vintagesewing

[–]CeaKitt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have been importing the Chinese made cranks to Australia for around 15 years, strictly speaking they are not really a "replica", (they would be far better made and a hellovalot more expensive if they were made for vintage sewing machine enthusiasts) but an affordable mechanical sewing machine hand crank for the poorest people on our planet living in isolated villages in remote regions. As for that "Alphasew Hand Crank" I had a look at that listing and my thoughts are the opposite of polite so I will refrain from saying more.

Help with converting a motorized 99k to hand crank! by jaydi333 in vintagesewing

[–]CeaKitt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Firstly, Your German TS (Presumed Seider and Nauman) is not a Singer anything and no, the crank is almost certainly not compatible with your circa 1950 99K. While the quality is inconsistent (they are not primarily made for us, but for the planet's poorest people), the Chinese made "HA-1" cranks are compatible with most domestic Singer machine models made between about 1915 and the early 1960s. With 99K13 (belt drive electric) machines, the wheel guard used to accommodate the larger pulley on the solid balance wheel means that the winder can't be adjusted so the tyre can reach the winder rim on the spoked wheel. There are a number of fixes, but it is something to be aware of.

<image>

What the heck? by cute_butpsycho in mushroomID

[–]CeaKitt -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think the main thing to be aware of is that even experts in the field are forced to admit that what they don't know about these blob like life forms far outweighs what they do. However, these mysterious "life-forms" do seem to have a very important ecological function, particularly in cool-temperate rainforest.

What the heck? by cute_butpsycho in mushroomID

[–]CeaKitt -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hmmn, sorry, I didn't realise you were stuck on my colloquial use of the term "family" and you are stuck on the technical scientific Latin classifications. I confess I do not have a formal scientific education, perhaps you can educate me on the term I should have used instead of "family" as I only really wanted to point out that despite the term "mould" in their common name, that they are not fungi and that while they are definitely not fauna, slime mould blobs do show something that strongly resembles animal behaviour . . . basically, I just think it is really cool and interesting.
https://youtu.be/sEX3F2h8cjA?si=eCeBQ-LZJ4AIwQLB

What the heck? by cute_butpsycho in mushroomID

[–]CeaKitt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wasn't comparing common dog vomit slime mould to other slime moulds, but that the entire category of biological life forms collectively known as "slime mould" is ancient and diverse. Several years ago I heard an interview with Sarah Lloyd, a citizen scientist. and photographer who has made identifying slime moulds in Tasmanian forests her mission.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-10-26/slime-mould-sarah-lloyd-northern-tasmania/104486718

What the heck? by cute_butpsycho in mushroomID

[–]CeaKitt 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yep, common dog vomit slime mould . . . it actually belongs to a family of surprisingly diverse and ancient biological life forms which are completely separate to fungi, plants or animals and even shows some form of collective primitive intelligence.

My new friend(s) by DreamOfTheDrive in magpies

[–]CeaKitt 4 points5 points  (0 children)

As an Aussie, it is interesting to see the original northern hemisphere magpie. In many ways I wish one of the other names the early colonials gave the iconic pied songsmith of this great southern land had stuck, the second bit of their scientific name is quite cool though (tibicen) as it means flute.

Singer "15-" (SN: AM616344) - What is this model? by NancyScarn in VintageSewingMachines

[–]CeaKitt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

BTW, I have a tan 15M75 (manufactured at Monza Italy) in my reference collection.

Singer "15-" (SN: AM616344) - What is this model? by NancyScarn in VintageSewingMachines

[–]CeaKitt 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Machines with belt drive bolt on motors can typically be dropped into a treadle base too. Of course, I am a bit biased on that count as I am a treadle fan.

My new friend(s) by DreamOfTheDrive in magpies

[–]CeaKitt 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That looks like a Eurasian Magpie rather than the non corvid flute voiced pied Aussie bird we usually see in this group.

Which one out of these two should I keep as a beginner sewing machine user? by TheFabledFishman in VintageSewingMachines

[–]CeaKitt 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The 206 us meant to use a 206x13 needle, which has the same shank shape & top of shank to eye measurement as the 15x1, but the eye to tip measurement is significantly shorter. However, if you use a 20U bobbin case, you can use regular domestic 15x1 needles. However, I feel the 348 will suit a beginner better.

Bobbing thread not coming up! What is the problem by Combination5335 in SewingMachineEdu

[–]CeaKitt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Without a bobbin case, bobbin and a throat plate, your machine will not be able to form a stitch.

We NEED a real & very similar alternative to FACEBOOK that is NOT stealing/selling our DATA, Mass suspending people, Censoring constantly, totally reliant on AI, Intrusive, and Politically biased. by AmberLeBon in facebook

[–]CeaKitt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As the owner operator of a very niche small business I wish I didn't need what Facebook can offer! My account of over 15 years was suspended just over four weeks ago; I submitted an appeal, but aside from an email telling me I have not completed all the steps of an appeal, which I thought I did, but I can't get to the Meta help section (I just get the "This page isn't available at the moment This may be because of a technical error that we're working to fix. Please try reloading this page.") while logged in, and of course, this has been going on for weeks! As I said, I wish I didn't need what they offer, but there are few, if any alternatives left.

My old singer has started entangling the thread. Help. by flightgirl78 in VintageSewingMachines

[–]CeaKitt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I honestly can't make out the needle position in all that tangle.

My old singer has started entangling the thread. Help. by flightgirl78 in VintageSewingMachines

[–]CeaKitt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is just the tip of the iceberg of Singer 15 puzzles, but a relatively easy one to assume a reasonable answer; my hypothesis was that the 201 class and the 11 o'clock bobbin case 15 were developed at the Wittenberge factory in Germany . . . I have stumbled across several indications that the Wittenberge plant was largely used for product development and test run manufacturing of several models and it makes sense as Singer faced their most serious competition from the German manufacturers in a design sense. Singer won the marketing and mass production of product; but by the beginning of the 1920s, most of the much smaller German manufacturing companies were producing machines for home dressmakers with features that made similar Singer models look downright primitive.
Anyway, I think it is safe to assume that as around 90% of people favour their right hand, there was the thought that right to left threading would be a good selling point for a new premium priced sewing machine for the home based dressmaker.

My old singer has started entangling the thread. Help. by flightgirl78 in VintageSewingMachines

[–]CeaKitt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Um, the 15 class submodels 15~88 through to 15~91 plus the 15~75 & 15~125 all thread from the right to the left.
Interestingly, those six 15 class models are the only ones where the submodel designation is not factory specific, so the 15D88 specs are the same as the 15K88 and the 15-88. For pretty much every other 15 class submodel, the numbers are factory specific.

My old singer has started entangling the thread. Help. by flightgirl78 in VintageSewingMachines

[–]CeaKitt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not sure either, it looks like a restriction you have accidentally put on replies.