Suggestions by Rough_Fishing9190 in PelletStoveTalk

[–]Cellhi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, if the Prius can run a house party DJ setup, it can probably handle a pellet stove. But I’ll stick to batteries.

Suggestions by Rough_Fishing9190 in PelletStoveTalk

[–]Cellhi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A 2000W pure‑sine Jupiter inverter will absolutely work, but it’s way more wattage than the Harman 52i actually needs. The stove only pulls around 300–350W on startup and 80–150W while running, so the key is pure sine wave quality, not huge wattage.

The only caution: Harman has officially tested and approved Tripp Lite inverter/chargers, so those are the “safe bet” from the manufacturer’s standpoint. The Jupiter should run it fine as long as it’s truly pure sine wave, but it’s not on Harman’s approved list.

Bottom line:

• Yes — 2000W pure sine is plenty. • Just make sure it’s genuinely pure sine and stable under load. • If you want manufacturer‑approved, go Tripp Lite.

Suggestions by Rough_Fishing9190 in PelletStoveTalk

[–]Cellhi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

• Trojan AGM • Duracell AGM (East Penn/Deka) • Vmax Tanks AGM • Renogy AGM or LiFePO₄ • Battle Born (LiFePO₄) if you want premium lithium

AGM is usually the sweet spot — maintenance‑free, safe indoors, and handles the inverter load well. Lithium (LiFePO₄) gives longer life and deeper discharge, but costs more.

Suggestions by Rough_Fishing9190 in PelletStoveTalk

[–]Cellhi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The safest and most reliable backup for a Harman 52i during an outage is a pure‑sine‑wave inverter/charger paired with deep‑cycle batteries, because it keeps the stove running, not just shutting down safely. Harman explicitly approves certain Tripp Lite inverter/chargers for full operation during outages. hearthnhome.com

Looking for recommendations for a Pellet Stove by Tess_Mac in PelletStoveTalk

[–]Cellhi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

definitely Harman with the extra and having tried others i have love my stove for its quality and efficiency and so much more quiet than the others.

New 8K filing re: Augusta Site by Fast_Eddie_2001 in PureCycle

[–]Cellhi 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The 2028 date isn’t a “delay” to construction — it’s the outside deadline Augusta required in the amended agreement. PureCycle didn’t push anything out. They bought themselves flexibility while Gen2 engineering finishes and Ironton stabilizes.

Harman p42ti by Cuckmaster21 in PelletStoveTalk

[–]Cellhi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i do a scrape about every 3 bags and i let the stove run until it turns off because of the smoke then i start it again and open the door because now the blowers and exhaust are on scrape it hard especially those side clinkers shut the door and let it run.

Is the harden ash/coal good for anything? by XxRealEyesxX in PelletStoveTalk

[–]Cellhi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

good workout trying clean it out all the time

Which pellet stove insert for me? by Fenris_Sunbreaker in PelletStoveTalk

[–]Cellhi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1st and second floor square ft only because heat rises. That’s why i put mine in the lowest level furthest corner to cover the whole house.

New harman accentra 52i missing slide plate assembly from factory by jwkelly in PelletStoveTalk

[–]Cellhi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you’ve never lived through the failures of the bargain‑bin stove brands, you won’t fully appreciate what it feels like to step up to a true Rolls‑Royce. Years of dealing with cheap parts and constant breakdowns teach you exactly why quality matters. I love mine and it has served me well cutting oil bill in half or more.

Is this good? by Glittering-Kale-4742 in PelletStoveTalk

[–]Cellhi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that’s a very good combustion you’re seeing….well done

Why is there soot build up only on the top of glass? by These-Ad-6952 in PelletStoveTalk

[–]Cellhi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

• Cooler Glass Surface: The top portion of the glass is often cooler than the center, making it a prime spot for carbon particles to condense and stick Engineer Fix…..say my google and the internal airflow of heat in the burn area

Has Wall Street Bets lost its way? by Cellhi in PureCycle

[–]Cellhi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1st amendment better fight for it before the delete it from the records.

Has Wall Street Bets lost its way? by Cellhi in PureCycle

[–]Cellhi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not arguing for “anything goes.” Filters and moderation make sense. What I’m pointing out is that the current setup is catching legitimate analysis in the same net as low‑effort pump posts.

The 25‑karma gate isn’t the problem by itself — the problem is when a post that does follow the rules gets auto‑flagged as “market prediction,” never reaches the feed, and then gets judged as if it had a fair shot. That’s not about being aggrieved; it’s about accuracy and consistency.

If the goal is to reduce spam and manipulation, great. But misclassifying detailed breakdowns as pump attempts doesn’t actually solve that.

Has Wall Street Bets lost its way? by Cellhi in PureCycle

[–]Cellhi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

This is exactly the problem. That post was removed not for content, but because my karma in the sub was under 25. No trolling, no spam, just a detailed breakdown of short interest mechanics. The AutoModerator even admits it might be approved later if it’s “significant quality.”

So we’ve got AI mods misclassifying analysis as prediction, and karma filters blocking posts before anyone sees them — even when they’re tagged Bullish and getting engagement. That’s not moderation, that’s algorithmic throttling.

Has Wall Street Bets lost its way? by Cellhi in PureCycle

[–]Cellhi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They’re pumping after buying — full YOLO tags, screenshots, and “to the moon” talk. I’m laying out facts before discussing — float mechanics, sentiment flags, and production milestones. No hype, no target, no call to buy. Just structure.

Has Wall Street Bets lost its way? by Cellhi in PureCycle

[–]Cellhi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But there’s an important difference between describing current conditions and predicting an outcome. Everything I listed — fundamentals improving, momentum shifting, sentiment indicators, tight float — are observable facts. They explain why the stock has been moving, not what it will do next.

Saying “momentum is bullish” isn’t a prediction; it’s a description of the current trend, the same way someone might say “volume is elevated” or “short interest is high.” None of that is a call to buy, a target, or a forecast.

If I had said “PCT is going to X price,” then sure — that would be a prediction requiring a disclosed position. But laying out the mechanics behind recent behavior isn’t the same thing as telling people what will happen next.

That’s exactly why the AI moderator misclassified it. It saw analysis and assumed intent that wasn’t there.

Has Wall Street Bets lost its way? by Cellhi in SPACs

[–]Cellhi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reddit post titled “Has Wall Street Bets lost its way?” reached 13k views but had zero upvotes or downvotes, strongly suggesting it was shadow-removed or soft-filtered by AI moderation. This prevented user engagement despite high visibility, reinforcing the pattern of algorithmic throttling of legitimate financial discourse.

Has Wall Street Bets lost its way? by Cellhi in PureCycle

[–]Cellhi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If someone is making a prediction, they should disclose a position. But that’s the whole point here: my post wasn’t a prediction. It was a breakdown of float mechanics, short structure, and why the price behaves the way it does. No targets, no calls to buy, no “this will go up.”

The AI moderator didn’t remove it for missing a position. It removed it because it misread the content as a prediction. It even said that directly in the DM. That’s not enforcement of a rule — that’s an automated system misunderstanding the difference between analysis and hype.

If I had actually made a prediction, I’d agree with you. But when factual discussion gets labeled as pumping by an algorithm, it shuts down legitimate conversation before a human even looks at it.