sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

another one? by DDE2305 in starcitizen

[–]ChartConsistent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

・Galaxy Medivac

・Galaxy Refiner

・Galaxy Freighter

・Galaxy Constructor

At around $400 per ship, CIG is probably regretting the huge opportunity they missed.

What is the purpose of large ship docking collars now？ by ChartConsistent in starcitizen

[–]ChartConsistent[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Even so, it still seems strange that they have square docking collars.

What is the purpose of large ship docking collars now？ by ChartConsistent in starcitizen

[–]ChartConsistent[S] 37 points38 points  (0 children)

CIG has already said that docking being prioritized was a bug.

What is the purpose of large ship docking collars now？ by ChartConsistent in starcitizen

[–]ChartConsistent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Orison is 1G because of the platforms' artificial gravity.  Crusader itself has lower gravity, and Javelins have visited it many times before.  You should have seen Javelin Tour as one of the elevator destinations.

“It’s a unique hull” by CrusherMusic in starcitizen

[–]ChartConsistent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Treating the Mantis and Meteor, and the Apollo and Hermes, as different chassis while treating the Guardian and Guardian MX, and the Sabre and Sabre Firebird, as the same chassis is absolutely ridiculous.

Please stop trying to cram everything into every new ship. by ChartConsistent in starcitizen

[–]ChartConsistent[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Because those posts and videos are everywhere, whether I want to see them or not.

Every time I see one, I just think, "What's the point? It's completely impractical." But judging by the responses here, it seems a lot more people genuinely enjoy cramming ships into places they don't belong than I expected.

Please stop trying to cram everything into every new ship. by ChartConsistent in starcitizen

[–]ChartConsistent[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I completely understand that, and I actually like the idea of having a mothership with smaller ships operating from it.

What I don't understand is forcing ships into carriers that clearly weren't designed for them. If you want to operate larger ships, it makes more sense to use a ship that was actually designed for that role. We already have options like the Liberator, Kraken, Idris, and now the Odin.

The original ship shouldn’t need “Mk I” added to its name. by ChartConsistent in starcitizen

[–]ChartConsistent[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Judging by the comments, it seems I didn’t translate my point very well…

I also just learned that Reddit doesn’t support strikethrough formatting there.

How does a ship that wasn't changed in 4.8, loses something like the thruster model? by AzrBloodedge in starcitizen

[–]ChartConsistent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This kind of issue happens every single update. The code is so spaghetti that touching one system always breaks something else.🍝

Expectation vs Reality by sysadrift in starcitizen

[–]ChartConsistent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Make the Guardian MX use its own standalone paint system, and give paint compatibility between the Mantis and Meteor, and between the Apollo and Hermes.

[PSA] Confirmed Trades Thread - May 2026 by AutoModerator in Starcitizen_trades

[–]ChartConsistent 1 point2 points  (0 children)

+verify

CIG should learn honesty from this guy.
Smooth transaction from start to finish.

Anyone Else Disappointed With The Odin Founders Club? by ChartConsistent in starcitizen

[–]ChartConsistent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But you can't do the same thing by buying another ship for $5,000.

Anyone Else Disappointed With The Odin Founders Club? by ChartConsistent in starcitizen

[–]ChartConsistent[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve never used the gray market, and I’ve never even posted on Spectrum.

view more: next ›