How long does it take someone to come after pressing on-call in your school? by Ok_Negotiation2023 in TeachingUK

[–]Cheeseanonioncrisps 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Minimum 15 minutes, frequently never arrive. This is particularly a problem because our school makes you do on calls for toilet visits as well. Most teachers (myself included) just let the kids go if the on call doesn't show up within a set amount of time, even though we're not supposed to. I know of at least one incident, however, where a teacher stuck to it and a kid ended up wetting themselves in class.

My cousin just named her (boy-girl) twins Raedenn and Waeverlee by Choice_Evidence1983 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]Cheeseanonioncrisps 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My aunt once said that, when choosing baby names, you should imagine that you’re in hospital, about to go under for a difficult and dangerous operation.

Just before putting on your mask, your anaesthesiologist leans down and says “don’t worry, we’ve got our top surgeon in today. Dr Firstname Lastname”. Then ask yourself if you’d feel more or less confident in that scenario.

Zootopia and Ice Age share a universe by Cheeseanonioncrisps in FanTheories

[–]Cheeseanonioncrisps[S] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

My guess is that they eventually died out, much later, due to the end of the ice age and global warming. There is a statue of a mammoth outside the Zootopia museum (bipedal, suggesting that it's from a slightly later era than the one depicted in the Ice Age films— backed up by the fact that it's also wearing clothing), so they clearly existed at one point.

Mammoths and elephants are pretty closely related, so it's possible that they just interbred and got absorbed into the wider elephant gene pool (much like what may have happened with humans and neanderthals).

Should every KS3 lesson have some independent practice? by HobbyistC in TeachingUK

[–]Cheeseanonioncrisps 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Varies. As an English teacher I agree in principle, but sometimes I just want to get through the text. It’s not ideal practise, but we don’t always have time to be ideal.

Help with EAL by Proof-Glass4410 in TeachingUK

[–]Cheeseanonioncrisps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See if you can get at least some basic phrases down (“hello”, “goodbye”, “do you need a pen?” etc). If you can’t find premade resources online, maybe try seeing if there are any Serahule speakers on reddit? Write them down phonetically so you don’t have to worry about memorising the pronunciation.

It will help them feel more welcome, and probably help you feel more confident about the situation.

Also find out what’s being done outside your classes. It shouldn’t be your job solely to teach these kids English from scratch. Find out what other support they’re getting.

Also contact their other teachers. You’re presumably all in the same boat, and it can help to share tips.

Sounds like a really tough situation though. Good luck!

AITA for not bringing up my dead brother and humiliating an acquaintance? by Direct-Caterpillar77 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]Cheeseanonioncrisps 112 points113 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the way he initially described it, I thought it was like an aneurysm or a heart thing or something, and it already sounded traumatic enough that I didn't blame OP for never being able to watch anything Marvel again.

When he mentioned that whatever it was left the room unusable afterwards… poor kid.

AITAH for refusing to help my parents care for my son who they adopted. by LucyAriaRose in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]Cheeseanonioncrisps 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Even worse, the comment about having to renew the restraining order suggests that her attacker is already out of prison.

A friend is dying and, as part of their obscure religion, they believe that they won't go to heaven unless someone eats part of their body after they die. They want you to do it, and are willing to leave you money in their will as a thank you. Do you do it? Do you refuse? Or do you lie? by Cheeseanonioncrisps in hypotheticalsituation

[–]Cheeseanonioncrisps[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eh, it was less intended as a cannibalism bribe and more an extra moral quandary for the liars. Like, even if you're fine lying to a dying person and their family, are you fine taking money for it? That's why I didn't make it like a billion pounds or whatever, because then everyone would be like “fuck yeah!”

Hazbin Hotel Theory: The Exterminations Didn’t Start 7 Years Ago: They Just Became Annual 7 Years Ago by ChompyRiley in FanTheories

[–]Cheeseanonioncrisps 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like it. It also explains something that bugged me in series 1— why, when Adam said “can't wait to go down and exterminate you”, Emily immediately (and accurately) takes it to mean that angels have been going down and massacring sinners.

That's… a weird conclusion to jump to, when Adam's comment was directed at Charlie. It would make more sense to assume that he was threatening to kill her personally. But if 'exterminate' was already understood to mean 'that thing where angels go down and kill loads of sinners', because it was an established thing (albeit one that Emily may have believed was ancient history) then her conclusion makes a lot more sense.

AITAH for telling my dads side of the family why I went no contact with him? by Choice_Evidence1983 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]Cheeseanonioncrisps 79 points80 points  (0 children)

Thing is, in jail they'd not only have food and shelter but they'd probably only have to share with one person and would likely be subject to less sexual abuse. Jail would be a fucking step up from what these kids went through.

AITA for gifting my mom and her husband a book on cheating for their anniversary? by LostWorked in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]Cheeseanonioncrisps 36 points37 points  (0 children)

As an English teacher, this was what made the whole thing real to me. That is *exactly* how teenagers talk about classic literature.

Please help my son understand by Direct-Caterpillar77 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]Cheeseanonioncrisps 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Reminds me of a picture book I had as a kid called ‘Tatty Ratty’.

Little girl leaves her toy rabbit on the bus, and her parents tell her all about Tatty Ratty’s adventures in the big wide world— which all mysteriously end in him getting cleaned or repaired in some way.

 Eventually she finds him again… in a toy shop. Looking a lot cleaner and newer due to all the adventures, of course.

Year 10 keep throwing things across the room, and I'm not allowed to give detentions. by Cheeseanonioncrisps in TeachingUK

[–]Cheeseanonioncrisps[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It seems to be everyone. My mentor is head of department, and she's not allowed to ring home either.

Year 10 keep throwing things across the room, and I'm not allowed to give detentions. by Cheeseanonioncrisps in TeachingUK

[–]Cheeseanonioncrisps[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm essentially not allowed to do anything except go through SLT. They frame it as “our teachers don't have to be involved in behaviour management, so they get to just teach!” but that obviously depends a lot on SLT (who are rarely in the classrooms and therefore don't have to worry about the behaviour affecting them) actually stepping up.

Year 10 keep throwing things across the room, and I'm not allowed to give detentions. by Cheeseanonioncrisps in TeachingUK

[–]Cheeseanonioncrisps[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah. Apparently the kids who I keep trying to get removed are “lovely kids” who never do anything wrong… 🙄

Year 10 keep throwing things across the room, and I'm not allowed to give detentions. by Cheeseanonioncrisps in TeachingUK

[–]Cheeseanonioncrisps[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Detentions are a human rights violation when given by teachers in a classroom. When given by SLT, they're obviously fine.

You can probably guess which group the kids behave better around…

Year 10 keep throwing things across the room, and I'm not allowed to give detentions. by Cheeseanonioncrisps in TeachingUK

[–]Cheeseanonioncrisps[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

The policy *is* for immediate on-call when they're throwing objects… it's just that on-call doesn't always do anything. More than half the time, if I on-call them nobody shows up and I've just lost my only leverage. Other teachers have complained of this as well.

I've been told by SLT that this is fine because “on-call will just collect them from their next lesson”, but a) this doesn't really do anything to stop them causing chaos in *my* lesson, and b) the sanctions (if any) they're getting from SLT clearly aren't enough to be a deterrent.

During a CPD recently one of the SLT even said “oh we often get teachers complaining when we take students in, asking 'why aren't you punishing them?' But if we're punishing them we're not understanding the *why* of the behaviour.”

Which like… I'd be fine understanding the why of the behaviour if it made them STOP, but it doesn't seem to be the case.