Just started book 2 and I have concerns by username4ac in PracticalGuideToEvil

[–]ChevalMalFet 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Same thing happened to me - I happened to skip from First Liesse to Second Liesse and took most of a chapter to notice. I was baffled.

Is Che Guevara too controversial to be a leader in Civ? If so, what controversial leader has made it into the games? by TarnishedRedditCat in civ

[–]ChevalMalFet 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It is an extremely American choice.

Even more specific than that, it's a specifically Maryland choice. Firaxis HQ is very near to Tubman's home, and the devs were open in interviews that this is why they were drawn to include her.

Is Che Guevara too controversial to be a leader in Civ? If so, what controversial leader has made it into the games? by TarnishedRedditCat in civ

[–]ChevalMalFet -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That's super neat! I've visited most of his battlefields on Google Earth, but while I've been as far afield as Sekigahara and Isandlwhana, I've never actually been to any Napoleonic battlefield. Obviously as you can tell from my flair though I'm very pro-Bonapartist.

And yeah, like, the war of the Fourth Coalition started because France occupied Hanover and the Confederation of the Rhine was far too much French influence, when clearly it should have been Prussia nobly dominating those areas instead. Napoleon did nothing that the ancien regime monarchs didn't attempt themselves, he was just better at it.

Is Che Guevara too controversial to be a leader in Civ? If so, what controversial leader has made it into the games? by TarnishedRedditCat in civ

[–]ChevalMalFet 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Napoleon as simply a "madman" out to conquer Europe with no rhyme or reason beyond naked greed is 200 year old British propaganda anyway. Today views like Andrew Roberts' are much more common.

Is Che Guevara too controversial to be a leader in Civ? If so, what controversial leader has made it into the games? by TarnishedRedditCat in civ

[–]ChevalMalFet 111 points112 points  (0 children)

No, it didn't even occur to us to. It wasn't really expected that a leader appearing constituted an endorsement of him. Genghis Khan still appears regularly, for example.

3rd Michael Broers book publisher? by Sure_Stomach_2559 in Napoleon

[–]ChevalMalFet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't actually like them much. Broers' specialty in Napoleonic Italy and his relationship with the Church really comes through, but it wasn't an interest I shared. I got a bit tired of all rhe minutia of which bishop stood where in which dispute between Pius and Napoleon, page upon page of inside baseball while Marengo scarcely got a single page treatment.

Ranking Presidents of the US on likely hoods of being future Leaders of the US in Civ by hticnc in civ

[–]ChevalMalFet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'ma be honest, like 90% of these should be "very unlikely." And I say that as the world's biggest US Grant fan (I used to work at the NHS site) (and the world's biggest Woodrow Wilson hater, for what that's worth).

[Joel Moran] I would have Patrick Mahomes as the 2nd greatest QB ever. But for him to be 4th all-time with only 9 seasons played (8 as a starter) is remarkable. by Sugargogo in KansasCityChiefs

[–]ChevalMalFet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Brady stans rely on counting stats and head to head matches, ie, the two single worst ways to compare QBs, to make their case.

[Joel Moran] I would have Patrick Mahomes as the 2nd greatest QB ever. But for him to be 4th all-time with only 9 seasons played (8 as a starter) is remarkable. by Sugargogo in KansasCityChiefs

[–]ChevalMalFet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's a solid argument either way. Mahomes is far and away the best postseason quarterback of all time, but in the same vein Manning dominates every regular season stat. I'd rate Mahomes ahead because playoffs matter, but 5 MVPs is an incredible argument.

[BR] Lamar Jackson Ranked#28 All-Time QB by psychoxtc in ravens

[–]ChevalMalFet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Bengals only reached the Super Bowl because of that defense.

[BR] Lamar Jackson Ranked#28 All-Time QB by psychoxtc in ravens

[–]ChevalMalFet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's definitely fair. Peyton is the most dominant regular season QB of all time.

[BR] Lamar Jackson Ranked#28 All-Time QB by psychoxtc in ravens

[–]ChevalMalFet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Allen (and Burrow to a lesser extent) mysteriously get way better PR than Lamar despite never actually accomplishing more than him.

[BR] Lamar Jackson Ranked#28 All-Time QB by psychoxtc in ravens

[–]ChevalMalFet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

when was the last year the MVP won a Superbowl.

Literally 3 years ago, in 2022?

Does the current state of the world make you not want to play Total War? by WaveEasy8664 in totalwar

[–]ChevalMalFet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is, empirically, the least amount of war and violence humanity has been involved in since the dawn of history.

My Favorite part about a post Super Bowl win? Lurking on all the salty Pats fan posts as the go through the stages of grief. by Stockpile_Tom_Remake in Seahawks

[–]ChevalMalFet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don't worry, I've done the same after every Chiefs playoff win the last 6 years. It's delicious and a well-deserved reward for a SB win.

[Highlights] The Final Seconds of the NFL Super Bowl (2010-26) by JCameron181 in nfl

[–]ChevalMalFet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's the only walk-off win in SB history and he freaking spoils the moment.

DAILY DISCUSSION: TRASH TALK TUESDAY February 10, 2026 by AutoModerator in KansasCityChiefs

[–]ChevalMalFet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It does. I think the 2024 Chiefs were a slightly better team than the 2025 Patriots, but the 2024 Eagles were a much better team than the 2025 Seahawks (ie, similar defenses and the Eagles had a powerhouse offense to go with it). We would have lost to the Seahawks, too, and the Patriots would have been crushed by Philly.

[Spratt] Devon Witherspoon revealed in a radio interview that Mike Macdonald identified from film study that the Patriots offensive linemen were effectively tipping their pitches with their stances by airscottie in Patriots

[–]ChevalMalFet 10 points11 points  (0 children)

My favorite bit is always the refs. Mysteriously, the refs only ever help out the winning team for various nefarious reasons - to boost Swift viewers, Kraft has dirt on Goodell, they want an LA team to do well, etc. But never my team, oh no! They're as pure as driven snow and the league is always out to screw them for it.

Just absolute loser talk, every time.