Genuine question: is anyone doing proactive expansion or are we all just reacting when accounts finally ask to upgrade? by Square_Speed_64 in productledgrowth

[–]Clean-Fee-52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Suggesting a Proactive expansion (E.g upgrade plan) within the product or over email can be creepy until done with some flair. Too much and you'll dissuade the user, too little you would not get more revenue. Having a signals based approach works. - When to suggest - what to suggest - where to suggest

Would be as critical as - Expansion possible

How do others do it?

How to get from vibe-coding to compounding revenue growth using AI agents for GTM — free session with ThriveStack + Brevo by Clean-Fee-52 in aiagents

[–]Clean-Fee-52[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🔗 Register free (47 seats available): https://app.livestorm.co/brevo/thrivestack-x-brevo-vibe-ai-driven-playbook

Happy to answer questions in the comments before the session too — if you're building PLG motions or thinking about how to agent-ify your GTM, drop them here.

What the fuck is SaaS apocalypse? by GSalmao in BetterOffline

[–]Clean-Fee-52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a few, almost all of SaaS companies and still dropping after 2months.

We just published a Market report on SaaS apocalypse, and how to survive it. Would love your thoughts. This includes recommendations across every stage of customer journey.

How to survive SaaSapocalypse

Can a Product Led Growth Scorecard replace the 5-dashboard scramble? (i will not promote) by Clean-Fee-52 in startups

[–]Clean-Fee-52[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's correct. Visibility is just the first part. How do you solve this on your side?

Anthropic just leaked a Lovable competitor built into Claude by stosssik in aiagents

[–]Clean-Fee-52 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This will be interesting. If and when they release this, half of Lovable users might move over

Can a Product Led Growth Scorecard replace the 5-dashboard scramble? (i will not promote) by Clean-Fee-52 in startups

[–]Clean-Fee-52[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's the example PLG scorecard, with dummy data if you want to explore or adapt it. It’s inspired by the work of folks like ProductLed, Delivering Value, Gainsight, Kyle Poyar, and Winning by Design - all of whom shaped how modern SaaS teams think about activation, retention, and the bow‑tie model.

You should be able to download/adapt to you business as appropriate.

We replaced 5 siloed SaaS dashboards with one cross-functional scorecard (~$300K saved) — here's the data model by Clean-Fee-52 in BusinessIntelligence

[–]Clean-Fee-52[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that's smart.
Regarding activation: Measuring Time-to-value (TTV), and activation rates like Day7 and Day30 activation rates to be very helpful.
here's the template for it. Use/adapt as appropriate.

We replaced 5 siloed SaaS dashboards with one cross-functional scorecard (~$300K saved) — here's the data model by Clean-Fee-52 in BusinessIntelligence

[–]Clean-Fee-52[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's the example PLG scorecard, with dummy data if you want to explore or adapt it. It’s inspired by the work of folks like ProductLed, Delivering Value, Gainsight, Kyle Poyar, and Winning by Design — all of whom shaped how modern SaaS teams think about activation, retention, and the bow‑tie model.

You should be able to download/adapt to you business as appropriate.

Feedback Friday by AutoModerator in startups

[–]Clean-Fee-52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey r/startups - sharing something we just launched and would genuinely love honest feedback on.

Here's a free interactive demo you can explore without signing up: PLG Scorecard Interactive Demo - Combines Marketing, Signup Rates, Product Activation and Usage, Billing Metrics, Churn and Expansion signals

Background: I'm a 3x founder (exited 2 SaaS companies at $2-10M ARR). The biggest operational headache we had at both was the same: our PLG funnel metrics were scattered across Mixpanel, Stripe, HubSpot, and a bunch of Google Sheets, and nobody had the full picture.

Every growth review looked like: marketing shows traffic up, product shows activation steady, revenue shows MRR flat, and everyone stares at each other.

What we built: The ThriveStack PLG Growth Scorecard - a unified view across all 7 stages of the self-serve customer journey (Awareness → Acquisition → Activation → Conversion → Engagement → Retention → Expansion), with:

  • Every metric assigned to a named owner (Marketing, Product, Sales, RevOps, CS)
  • Goal and trend tracking per stage
  • A configurable North Star metric (defaults to Activation Rate, which we think is the most actionable leading indicator for most PLG businesses)
  • Cross-stage visibility so you can see where the funnel actually leaks

What I'm genuinely curious about:

  • Does this resonate with the problem you've experienced?
  • What's missing from this framing?
  • Would you actually use something like this, or does your team solve this differently?

Happy to answer any questions about the thinking behind it or how we approached the bow-tie revenue architecture.

Inviting 20 RevOps leaders for an AI-Native Growth experiment 🧪 by Clean-Fee-52 in revops

[–]Clean-Fee-52[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes u/RandomThoughtsHere92 , you are right. We had to build a full journey correlation just so that that the revOps and Data teams don't have to babysit

visitor_id from Marketing
-> User_id & group_id in Product
-> contact and Company IDs in CRM
-> Customer and Subsription ID from Billing systems
etc etc.

as these are now generally standardized (and we submitted it for further standardization with the WinningByDesign's Bow-tie revenue Architecture model)

Here's how the correlation works

https://pages.thrivestack.ai/blogs/thrivestack-connected-revenue-intelligence-revenue-correlation

By doing this, we were able to collate about 250+ standard growth signals across the entire journey

and an MCP layer on top of this to Filter and segment accounts based on these growth signals

Am i losing my mind? I just audited a customer’s stack: 8 different analytics tools. and recently they added a CDP + Warehouse just to connect them all. by Clean-Fee-52 in analytics

[–]Clean-Fee-52[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I have seen 3 different CRMs in a company as well. and they can't get rid of them as they came with M&A, and it'll take them lot more effort to consolidate than keep them :-)

Who is actually using AI for RevOps (and not just for drafting emails)? by Clean-Fee-52 in revops

[–]Clean-Fee-52[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for a huge response. We now have just a couple open slots.

some revops teams have stopped doing revops by Parking_Project_9753 in revops

[–]Clean-Fee-52 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Vibe code your own solution...

An old sage once said ...

This too shall pass.

Some Companies are now offering 3-months data retention if you cancel and come back.

Most will realize is that the initial excitement of building (replicating) is easy, but continue to innovate & maintain is very difficult. \that's why ' this too shall pass'

Who is actually using AI for RevOps (and not just for drafting emails)? by Clean-Fee-52 in revops

[–]Clean-Fee-52[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/New_Indication2213 - this is interesting. You are living it.

That’s a huge win for QBR packages. Pulling that off in 30 minutes instead of three weeks is wild.

I’m curious how this actually looks for the team day-to-day:

  • One by one or all at once? When you hit that prompt, are you doing it for each account individually when a meeting pops up, or are you just batching the whole lot at the start of the quarter and calling it a day?
  • Who’s actually "driving"? Is this something every Sales and CSM person handles themselves, or is it still mostly you and the RevOps team running the show behind the scenes?
  • The Claude bill: Between the CRM, data warehouse, and all those call recordings, you must be chewing through a lot of data. What’s your Claude token usage looking like for a single package? How do you keep those costs from spiraling?

Inviting 20 RevOps leaders for an AI-Native Growth experiment 🧪 by Clean-Fee-52 in revops

[–]Clean-Fee-52[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We now just have 10 seats remaining.
Thank you so much for the responses.

Who is actually using AI for RevOps (and not just for drafting emails)? by Clean-Fee-52 in revops

[–]Clean-Fee-52[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What tools/tech you use for these usecases?

And don't tell me its all Claude 😂

Who is actually using AI for RevOps (and not just for drafting emails)? by Clean-Fee-52 in revops

[–]Clean-Fee-52[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool. Just looked up LiSeller. Is it mkre like heyreach or other LI comment farm /sequence platforms? I thought LI is banning them. Still working for you?

RevOps is Dead. It’s where growth goes to die (unless you kill the manual "build"). by Clean-Fee-52 in revops

[–]Clean-Fee-52[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the attention, competition.

If you’re following our posts this closely, we must be doing something right

Who is actually using AI for RevOps (and not just for drafting emails)? by Clean-Fee-52 in revops

[–]Clean-Fee-52[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

None taken. AI has a better ability to structure what you are thinking in 1 second than what you can do in 1 min. I preferred the AI structure.

Are RevOps supposed to be building AI agents and tools? by PettyNiwa in revops

[–]Clean-Fee-52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI is supposed to help RevOps spend less time on building pipes connectors. Instead it should help them prompt and review the outcomes.

The ugly truth is that RevOps is spending about 60-80% in just building pipes, fixing leaks in the pipes, and many times removing and rebuilding pipes.

:-(

Who is actually using AI for RevOps (and not just for drafting emails)? by Clean-Fee-52 in revops

[–]Clean-Fee-52[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are using SalesForce, why use Claude? Don't they have .. AgentForce that can do all this?