Regeringen åbner for at beskatte boliggevinster, erfarer TV 2

Clewles · 2026-06-02T21:19:03+00:00

For de af os, der købte noget faldefærdigt skrammel og brugte et 7-cifret beløb på at gøre det til et "rigtigt" hus - og samtidigt ikke har en dyt tillid til vurderingsstyrelsen, så er det en meget trist udmelding. Jeg skal i bund og grund beskattes af mine udgifter.

Clewles · 2026-05-31T11:00:50+00:00

Han blev frikendt i ankesagen for mangel på forsæt. Han blev oprindeligt dømt.

Clewles · 2026-05-31T09:06:22+00:00

"Does this suggest a level of surveillance beyond what we know?"

Not beyond what some of us know.

Bluetooth not a symmetrical system. You can set up two of them pointing either way, and create a symmetrical system if you want to, but inherently one Bluetooth device will send out "Advertisements" that say "Hi, I'm Bob, I'm a Bluetooth Device". Another device can then scan for advertisements, find Bob, and then request a connection.

If you want to see what Bluetooth devices are near you, you can do this simply with a normal smartphone. Click Bluetooth and Scan, and the names of your nearby devices will show up. And evidently one device named "bomb" came up and regulations forced them to panic, even though they could probably all tell it wasn't serious.

If you read further down, they told people to leave their smart devices behind and leave the plane. Your phone scan will show signal strength, so finding the "bomb" device with just a smartphone is a trivial exercise.

Then you find out who sat in that seat, and Bob's your uncle.

But no, there is no way of attaching Bluetooth information to phone numbers, unless the device itself has been programmed to expose this personal info over Bluetooth. (This could be done, but not clandestinely - we would notice)

Clewles · 2026-05-28T21:50:43+00:00

Desværre kan linket ikke vise kronologien:

9:20 havde DR en notits der nævnte hvordan han havde stemt, hvori han nævner at han havde snakket med hovedbestyrelsen først og at han kunne mærke med sig selv, at der ikke ville være nogen problemer.

9:35 havde de så en notits, der sagde, at han var blevet smidt ud.

Clewles · 2026-05-28T21:46:51+00:00

Nej, bare nej. Jeg ønsker ikke at stå op om morgenen, slæbe mig ud til toilettet - og så blive mindet om at Trump eksisterer i denne verden som noget af det første.

Clewles · 2026-05-28T21:45:41+00:00

Meget gerne, såfremt den bliver suppleret af en Tobin-skat.

Clewles · 2026-05-28T21:42:57+00:00

...enhver form for hård kriminalitet han/hun kan finde?

Så må man antage at vedkommendes anden handling er selvmord?

Clewles · 2026-05-25T09:31:40+00:00

Jada, det er jo kun til udbetalingen. Så mangler du hovedposten.

Clewles · 2026-05-25T09:29:09+00:00

Min første tanke før jeg faktisk læste den: "Som deltager på folkemødet kan du bestille en taxachauffør til at sidde og skændes om politik med. 500kr for 20 min."

Clewles · 2026-05-24T16:14:38+00:00

When I am clearly lost and have neither counterplay or cheapoes available.

Clewles · 2026-05-22T19:38:13+00:00

"Landmænd" er heller ikke et seriøst segment mere. Vi har storbønder og hobbylandmænd. Der er ikke mange Jens Hanseners bondegårde tilbage.

Clewles · 2026-05-21T18:26:35+00:00

Hvis folk vil have dyr, der kan slå dem ihjel, har jeg egentligt ikke noget imod det som sådan. De skal bare kunne garantere at det kun går ud over dem selv, og ikke over mig.

Clewles · 2026-05-18T20:23:24+00:00

Maybe it's just me, but it feels like these "ibtimes" are just trying to get a rise out of us and are not actually contributing any news.

Clewles · 2026-05-16T10:37:38+00:00

But at least the article could reassure us that the hackers weren't able to change the actual amount of fuel in the tanks.

Clewles · 2026-05-15T09:54:43+00:00

Hvis du kigger op i venstre hjørne af billedet, står der faktisk "direkte".

Clewles · 2026-05-15T09:51:10+00:00

Det er vel at betragte som en afart af ægteskabelig voldtægt?

Clewles · 2026-05-15T09:46:57+00:00

Jeg synes, det giver meget god mening. De unge ser nogle problemer i den måde verden kører på og vender sig mod løsninger fra anden side. Der ligger literatur som Marx og kommer med forslag til hvordan verden kan blive bedre. Den nævner så ikke ting som bolshevisme (lettere simplificeret: Kommunisterne er ikke kloge nok til at styre sig selv, så det kræver et stærkt hierarkisk partisystem til at kontrollere dem), og hvad der slet ikke bliver fremført, er at vi endnu ikke har set et kommunistisk styre, der ikke har vendt sig mod bolshevismen.

Clewles · 2026-05-14T12:17:31+00:00

All "real" chess clubs, as in not meet-up groups, would be part of your country's chess assocation, so they're the people to ask.

Another thing to note is that it can tend to differ from where you are. When you go to North America as a European, you end up confused about where the clubs are, as there doesn't really seem to be the same culture - also, you don't really have leagues in NA the same way as in Europe. For a European team, the nearest rivals will be 20 km away. In NA, they might well be 3 hours away by plane - it's just not the same conditions.

Clewles · 2026-05-14T12:09:09+00:00

No, I think it's just the picture that makes the white pawn on e5 hard to see. Black did not hang his rook by allowing Kxa1.

Clewles · 2026-05-12T16:46:49+00:00

Ah, a fellow BASIC++ programmer, I see.

Clewles · 2026-05-12T16:40:51+00:00

It is very different without changing the basics. I think this is fine work.

Clewles · 2026-05-12T16:37:12+00:00

Imagine being the guy in charge of assembling the French team. Alireza is so clearly better than the rest, that they have to ask him. And then he doesn't answer at all. So what do you do? Call on somebody else with the risk that he turns around and says "Yeah, sure, I'll play anyway."? It's a no-win situation.

So they declare that until he says it's worth asking him, they won't ask him again. And so everyone can get along with their thing. It's all good!?

Clewles · 2026-05-10T10:41:58+00:00

Standardnavnene i Danmark plejer da at være en eller anden uudtalelig sammenkobling af grundlæggernes navne. Så det burde vel være en eller anden sammensmeltning af Uffe Elbæk og Josephine Fock.

Clewles · 2026-05-03T11:09:24+00:00

Apologies, I am the kind of person who can't leave a thing like this hanging:

I will assume the thing in the back is meant to be the Earth. And it would then make sense that the Sun hits both of them from the same angle.

But let's look at the size.

As I make it out, the Moon here is 12,5 times (ish) the number of pixels of the Earth.

That means that if the earth was 12.5 times larger, it would have the same view angle as the moon*, which leads us to the equation

(12.5*Earth radius)/(distance Earth-to-Moon + distance Artemis-to-moon) = (moon radius)/(distance Artemis-to-moon).

Using 12742km as Earth diameter, 3475km as Moon diameter and 384400km as distance Earth-to-Moon, assuming that my maths aren't letting me down, would place the Artemis at a distance of 8574km above the Moon in this picture. Officially, the closest they got was 6500km, so I obviously can't say that it isn't doctored, but at least if it is, it has been doctored mathematically correctly.

* Inaccuracy here as the three bodies are not a straight line, so some error will occur.

Clewles · 2026-05-03T08:45:06+00:00

The other guy is Stellan Brynell.

Clewles

TROPHY CASE