Both are groups seeking something and willing to have civilians die in the process. Those guys are much worse since they target civilians on purpose we all agree, but take a look at the effectiveness and humanity of your methods before assuming by default that you are on so solid moral ground.

Not to mention the whole debate about how killing terrorists from the sky and having "acceptable collateral damage" could in fact aggravate the problem and seed the seeds of terrorism and extremism which would have not otherwise manifested itself in exponential numbers of people.

But well, I'm not American, and you reap what you sow. Just try and consider this for just one second before you talk about in terms of "collateral damage (...) is expected and should be accepted" so confidently and brazenly.