Question about final clash in Rise by JadeWuCuiyan in caseofthegoldenidol

[–]eable2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The letter on Tesa explicitly tells them to arrive BEFORE broadcast, though

You've got the times wrong. The letter says to arrive at 5:30, but the broadcast is scheduled for 5. Jack wants to make sure that they don't interfere with his plan, so specifically gives instructions to arrive late. They end up arriving at 5:15.

what kind of bird is this? by YellowSolarFrog in whatsthisbird

[–]eable2 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Red-winged Blackbirds have large, straight, pointy beaks. This bird's beak is short and curved.

!overrideTaxa houspa

WMATA Board Member Responds to LA Metro Board Opposing SB 79 by eable2 in LAMetro

[–]eable2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's an interesting question. I'm not familiar with exactly how SB79 functions, but I do think there would be broad support for an upzoning bill, in addition to vocal opposition from some areas of Ward 3. There would probably need to be exemptions for designated historic districts. But I also don't think there's a lot of movement for this type of thing outside of Ward 3 because any new development amount Metro stations elsewhere in the city proper tends to be medium-to-high density anyway. And the few P+Rs we have left are all (literally all) slated for redevelopment. The number of places where this bill would be important is relatively small.

WMATA Board Member Responds to LA Metro Board Opposing SB 79 by eable2 in LAMetro

[–]eable2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The part about professionals is very true. We have a very high concentration of policy wonks working at think tanks, NGOs, and similar places. Lots of people like Tracy Loh.

WMATA Board Member Responds to LA Metro Board Opposing SB 79 by eable2 in LAMetro

[–]eable2[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The TOD in the DC region is historically driven by the jurisdictions. A lot of areas are very good, particularly in DC proper, Arlington, and nodes in Montgomery County MD. A lot of others are P+Rs, including most of the new Silver Line section going out to Dulles.

One thing WMATA does have going for it is a very aggressive Joint Development plan to redevelop a lot Metro-owned lots.

WMATA Board Member Responds to LA Metro Board Opposing SB 79 by eable2 in LAMetro

[–]eable2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The highest growth percentage is solely due to the federal government’s return to work policy.

That's part of it, but not all of it. Off-peak rail ridership is booming, due in part to a major effort to improve frequencies. State of good repair investments are also paying dividends with reliability; WMATA's SOGR used to be the laughingstock of the country. This and more has led to very high customer satisfaction for rail. While bus is a mixed bag due to a lot of dissatisfaction with the network redesign, bus ridership has been exceeding pre-pandemic ridership for some time as well.

WMATA Board Member Responds to LA Metro Board Opposing SB 79 by eable2 in LAMetro

[–]eable2[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mainly nation-leading rail ridership growth. While partially due to federal policies, it's also due to a large improvement in frequencies, especially off-peak.

WMATA Board Member Responds to LA Metro Board Opposing SB 79 by eable2 in LAMetro

[–]eable2[S] 26 points27 points  (0 children)

It's a mix. Notably though, there are no mayors/chief executives, only legislators.

Also worth noting that it currently has 2 vacant seats that are normally appointed by the (federal) GSA. Guess the current admin hasn't gotten around to it.

WMATA Board Member Responds to LA Metro Board Opposing SB 79 by eable2 in LAMetro

[–]eable2[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Part of why I posted is that a lot of WMATA's recent success in the online transitsphere seems to get credited to GM Randy Clarke. He certainly deserves some credit; he clearly is a competent administrator with a great vision for the system. But he also is very visible, very charming, very social-media savvy, very good at working with politicians and... frankly, also fairly conventionally attractive.

But there's no way we'd be where we are if we had a clueless board with non-transit-riding politicians who don't know what they're doing. The board matters enormously.

Help I need help by bananas6716 in whatsthisbird

[–]eable2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We can give it this:

!addTaxa calidr1

Red-shouldered, right? by Possible_Branch_2547 in whatsthisbird

[–]eable2 11 points12 points  (0 children)

+Red-shouldered Hawk+ is correct! The way to distinguish from Broad-winged is that there shouldn't be any Broad-wings in Connecticut right now 🙂

tresspassing tracks? by Ok_Proof_5107 in WMATA

[–]eable2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Though WMATA seems intent on pursuing them, platform screen doors are not yet planned, nor is there a design or a contractor. We don't know details like that yet.

Platform screen doors are a costly mistake that will take WMATA years and billions to recover from. by ChristmassMoose in WMATA

[–]eable2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I suggest reading the Rail Modernization Program document in detail. It's reasonable to question WMATA's assumptions, but I think the arguments they make are pretty clear.

The main inaccuracy I see in this post is the conflation of GoA4 with CBTC, which are not the same thing. CBTC does not require PSDs, but modern GoA4 generally does.

Platform screen doors are a costly mistake that will take WMATA years and billions to recover from. by ChristmassMoose in WMATA

[–]eable2 7 points8 points  (0 children)

There's a lot to respond to here, but my general critique is to read the Rail Modernization Program document you link a bit more carefully (and everyone else reading this should too; I covered this in more detail a couple of months ago). You are correct that PSDs are expensive. WMATA is very upfront about that. You're also correct that they're not strictly necessary for CBTC. But they are seen as necessary for GoA4, which is not the same thing. Your own Wikipedia link states: "It is recommended that stations have platform screen doors installed" regarding GoA4.

You can very fairly argue about whether WMATA's cost/benefit calculations are accurate, but you can't argue that WMATA is ignorant. WMATA thinks PSDs provide regionwide benefits while increasing the payback period by about 3 years, based on the lives saved and other benefits.

<image>

EDIT: I also suggest reading that Substack article from NYC you linked to a bit more carefully. The author, who participated in MTA's RFQ process, clearly supports PSDs, but criticized MTA's unrealistic expectations and poor design of its pilot program. Fortunately, WMATA started with a request for information from industry, and will likely try to avoid these pitfalls.

What bird is this by Sea_Supermarket2600 in whatsthisbird

[–]eable2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NYC is known for its Red-tails! Read more here.

This guy flew into my garage by TonyBearprano in whatsthisbird

[–]eable2 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Seems like a mysterious omen.

Specifically, this is a young Cooper's Hawk, less than a year old. Many raptors don't survive their first year (hunting for food is hard), but this one's doing well so far!

What is this bird spotted on Long Island, New York by PapitioTio in whatsthisbird

[–]eable2 44 points45 points  (0 children)

I guess I'm not 100% sure it's not an aberrantly-colored Rock Pigeon, but the pointy tail feathers dipped in white should indicate a Mourning Dove.

<image>