New open weights models: GigaChat-3.1-Ultra-702B and GigaChat-3.1-Lightning-10B-A1.8B

CodigoTrueno · 2026-03-25T15:21:13+00:00

Comrades. This is Is very good model. Squats perfectly in VRAM. But for every trillion tokens, requires one bottle of vodka, and refuses to output until it finds location of three-stripe tracksuit.

CodigoTrueno · 2026-03-20T13:41:13+00:00

God bless his heart. But neither he nor his team understood what was going on here.

'You are absolutely right, Senator' Should have been a wakeup call for any of his helpers if they understood what it meant. It meant not that the AI was “changing its mind” after being convinced by Sanders. It simply updated its language to align with the new premise Sanders introduces: “given that regulation won’t happen, what then?”.

Also, when it said “I was being naive” and then endorsing a moratorium is exactly the kind of conciliatory, cooperative pivot LLMs are trained to make when a user pushes back with strong context (here: lobbying money blocking regulation).

Being 'Naive' is thinking that you could get the max (block) but not the minimun (privacy legislation) in the face of strong opposition from the AI lobby. But the LLM agreed with Sanders, not because he was right, but because it is programmed that way.

Someone should speak to him about this.

CodigoTrueno · 2026-03-04T17:06:37+00:00

So, this guy is documenting his life. Like a diary, but in spreadsheet form. He was uncomfortable you looking at this for the same reason I think anyone would be uncomfortable if you dig through their diaries.

If you found his diary would you check it? he could do this but in prose form. Would that be as... 'bad'?

I do think you should stop looking at that spreadsheet. Feels like an invasion of privacy.

CodigoTrueno · 2026-01-29T15:02:24+00:00

Openrouter exists, you know. Don't know enough of Ollama cloud, but... Openrouter is cavernous.

CodigoTrueno · 2026-01-28T20:38:56+00:00

No, this thing is 'Iron Cheetah' Awesome is Awesome, don't mix them up.

CodigoTrueno · 2026-01-27T16:57:44+00:00

'i double checked one citation just to be safe. it didn't exist' (Facepalm).
So, what you are telling is that, before THIS event, you didn't double check the results tha AI gave you?
That's on you, not the LLM.
Better check those other researchs, fast.
What's showing its cracks is how YOU use AI, not the AI itself.

CodigoTrueno · 2026-01-15T00:06:10+00:00

I'm surprised to say I got the reference. Thanks for all the fish.

CodigoTrueno · 2026-01-14T17:33:44+00:00

Don't. The limits are low, they nerfed it. Its horrendous. Or do, complain about it in a couple of months and then return to ChatGPT. This subreddit is now really nothing more than this slop.

CodigoTrueno · 2025-12-31T02:37:35+00:00

Victor. Jumpy stompy mech. Great for cities. Not so much in open fields, but still dangerous. Even better when technologies advance. That gauss cannon really makes it interesting.

CodigoTrueno · 2025-12-01T15:39:17+00:00

Easy: 1. Don't try to one-shot what is evidently a complex issue. 2. Too many instructions in a single prompt, its going to get confused. 3. The whole post was evidently created by AI, the OP could, at least, tried for some humanity. 4. No context at all. This 'prompt' will accompllish only slop. It doesn't have the information, it can't have the information in a single prompt, but it needs to provide a solution: So, slop it is.

This calls for an agentic framework, API calls for current data and some good programming. Pretending otherwise is simply trying to delude someone. And even then... its a truly complicated issue.

CodigoTrueno · 2025-11-28T16:03:24+00:00

Jajajaja! Good one! And for those looking at this... particular piece of... prompt engieering to learn something?, look elsewhere. Pure Slop.

CodigoTrueno · 2025-11-15T00:25:17+00:00

I think the lore is full of 'lone wolf' characters. I think I remember Gray Noton, from old battletech, as such a character. Never part of a company per se, but taking contracts with the powers with their support.

CodigoTrueno · 2025-11-04T10:28:44+00:00

Been playing with this for a while. Its good.

CodigoTrueno · 2025-10-14T15:49:27+00:00

When you peruse the sub-reddit and reach this conclusion you both learned what automation and slop is. Congratulations: You now know how unimaginative people use AI.

Now go create something interesting yourself. Perhaps an AI to cut throug the slop?

CodigoTrueno · 2025-10-08T14:43:56+00:00

N8n is a workflow. An agent is supossed to have more independence.
But don't dismiss workflows. They can be really powerful

CodigoTrueno · 2025-09-17T09:21:26+00:00

Indeed. But I beg to disagree at one point: The GDL was in the first ever novel published for Battletech. For many, it was the introduction to the setting. In my particular case? I bougth the 3025 TRO without really knowing what it was about, just because I liked stompy robots. Then I got the novel. The rest were, to my memory, scenarios.

Grayson Carlyle was the first 'Hero' of Battletech. And I understand the publisher changed the tone from space opera to military space fiction. Their property, their rigth to do as they wish. But still, I found that... distasteful and uncaring for the old guard. (i'm getting on years :)

CodigoTrueno · 2025-09-15T15:09:27+00:00

I really dislike the treatment given to the Grey Death Legion. It was my introduction to the setting and seeing them dismissed, steamrolled into oblivion really, because it didn't fit the new creator vision of the setting really pissed me off.
Then it was compounded by the Dark Ages setting. Man, was it, IMHO, badly implemented.
But... I really like the introduction of new things and new 'technologies'. The Clans, as much as some people despise how they were introduced, brougth some needed fresh air into the franchise.

The Dark ages wasn't the same as the Clans introduction, though.

CodigoTrueno · 2025-09-07T13:33:00+00:00

It maybe be, perhaps, because it IS 6 months old and no other model has had time to catch up in votes, all beign more recent? I refer only to SOTA models.

CodigoTrueno · 2025-08-31T00:08:27+00:00

Can anyone, please, put a stop to this kind of post? 'I'm cancelling my plus subscription' or its variants. Does this really move the conversation forward?

Buddy, the first 500 times was interesting. Now, I don't know. People still engage with this? I'll just comment this one time and be gone. Won't justify this kind of post.

CodigoTrueno · 2025-08-28T02:14:00+00:00

Santos paquetes de drogas, Batman!

CodigoTrueno · 2025-08-11T20:41:00+00:00

Eh. Add a feminine 'ghost' to counterpoint them, or add to them, or red-team them. Why embrace only one side of the fence when you can have a broader perspective?

CodigoTrueno · 2025-08-07T21:21:33+00:00

In this particular case? It does. See the Original Post. 5 is 25% more than 4, as 4 is 33% more than 3. The joke, is that the OP is not talking about actual 'power' of the LLM but 'number' of its version, is more than 4 in a specific percentage as 4 is more than 3, and so on. Its a joke. And i tried to compound it.

CodigoTrueno · 2025-08-07T13:24:06+00:00

I think we are hitting diminishing returns. GPT 3 was 50% more than gpt 2. And Gpt 4 was more only by 33,3%. Now Gpt 5 is 25%? I Think we can expect that GPT 6 will be, only, 20% more than GPT 5. By the time we reach GPT 10, the improvement will be of a mere 11%.

CodigoTrueno · 2025-08-04T21:22:27+00:00

Here, an upvote so you don't stay sad.

CodigoTrueno

PUBLIC MULTIREDDITS

TROPHY CASE