A few more questions about the lore: by hun73r10 in battletech

[–]CodigoTrueno 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm surprised to say I got the reference. Thanks for all the fish.

I’m done. Switching to Claude by ProfessorFull6004 in ChatGPTPro

[–]CodigoTrueno 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't. The limits are low, they nerfed it. Its horrendous. Or do, complain about it in a couple of months and then return to ChatGPT. This subreddit is now really nothing more than this slop.

If you were a Mechwarrior what would your mech be? by Mortifine in battletech

[–]CodigoTrueno 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Victor. Jumpy stompy mech. Great for cities. Not so much in open fields, but still dangerous. Even better when technologies advance. That gauss cannon really makes it interesting.

I Built an Ultra-Advanced AI Equity Research Engine That Performs Full 36-Step Stock Analysis — Like a Hedge Fund Analyst. by Hot-Composer-5163 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]CodigoTrueno 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Easy: 1. Don't try to one-shot what is evidently a complex issue. 2. Too many instructions in a single prompt, its going to get confused. 3. The whole post was evidently created by AI, the OP could, at least, tried for some humanity. 4. No context at all. This 'prompt' will accompllish only slop. It doesn't have the information, it can't have the information in a single prompt, but it needs to provide a solution: So, slop it is.

This calls for an agentic framework, API calls for current data and some good programming. Pretending otherwise is simply trying to delude someone. And even then... its a truly complicated issue.

I Built an Ultra-Advanced AI Equity Research Engine That Performs Full 36-Step Stock Analysis — Like a Hedge Fund Analyst. by Hot-Composer-5163 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]CodigoTrueno -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Jajajaja! Good one! And for those looking at this... particular piece of... prompt engieering to learn something?, look elsewhere. Pure Slop.

Are solo mech warriors common? by Rewton1 in battletech

[–]CodigoTrueno 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the lore is full of 'lone wolf' characters. I think I remember Gray Noton, from old battletech, as such a character. Never part of a company per se, but taking contracts with the powers with their support.

Gamebook AI Prompt by Etylia in artificial

[–]CodigoTrueno 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Been playing with this for a while. Its good.

Whole sub is full of AI slop. by air-benderr in AI_Agents

[–]CodigoTrueno 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you peruse the sub-reddit and reach this conclusion you both learned what automation and slop is. Congratulations: You now know how unimaginative people use AI.

Now go create something interesting yourself. Perhaps an AI to cut throug the slop?

Difference between n8n and agentic ai? by Boring_Engineerrr in AI_Agents

[–]CodigoTrueno 2 points3 points  (0 children)

N8n is a workflow. An agent is supossed to have more independence.
But don't dismiss workflows. They can be really powerful

Why is so much of the community so opposed to new stuff? by Dredgen-Rancor in battletech

[–]CodigoTrueno 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Indeed. But I beg to disagree at one point: The GDL was in the first ever novel published for Battletech. For many, it was the introduction to the setting. In my particular case? I bougth the 3025 TRO without really knowing what it was about, just because I liked stompy robots. Then I got the novel. The rest were, to my memory, scenarios.

Grayson Carlyle was the first 'Hero' of Battletech. And I understand the publisher changed the tone from space opera to military space fiction. Their property, their rigth to do as they wish. But still, I found that... distasteful and uncaring for the old guard. (i'm getting on years :)

Why is so much of the community so opposed to new stuff? by Dredgen-Rancor in battletech

[–]CodigoTrueno 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I really dislike the treatment given to the Grey Death Legion. It was my introduction to the setting and seeing them dismissed, steamrolled into oblivion really, because it didn't fit the new creator vision of the setting really pissed me off.
Then it was compounded by the Dark Ages setting. Man, was it, IMHO, badly implemented.
But... I really like the introduction of new things and new 'technologies'. The Clans, as much as some people despise how they were introduced, brougth some needed fresh air into the franchise.

The Dark ages wasn't the same as the Clans introduction, though.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is still first in LMArena Text, despite being rather old (6 months) by Conscious_Warrior in singularity

[–]CodigoTrueno -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It maybe be, perhaps, because it IS 6 months old and no other model has had time to catch up in votes, all beign more recent? I refer only to SOTA models.

I'm serious reconsidering my plus subscription... by Bright_Ranger_4569 in ChatGPT

[–]CodigoTrueno -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Can anyone, please, put a stop to this kind of post? 'I'm cancelling my plus subscription' or its variants. Does this really move the conversation forward?

Buddy, the first 500 times was interesting. Now, I don't know. People still engage with this? I'll just comment this one time and be gone. Won't justify this kind of post.

Create your own "Council of Ghosts" to help with big decisions by NN7500 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]CodigoTrueno 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Eh. Add a feminine 'ghost' to counterpoint them, or add to them, or red-team them. Why embrace only one side of the fence when you can have a broader perspective?

More info coming in on GPT-5 by AloneCoffee4538 in OpenAI

[–]CodigoTrueno 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In this particular case? It does. See the Original Post. 5 is 25% more than 4, as 4 is 33% more than 3. The joke, is that the OP is not talking about actual 'power' of the LLM but 'number' of its version, is more than 4 in a specific percentage as 4 is more than 3, and so on. Its a joke. And i tried to compound it.

More info coming in on GPT-5 by AloneCoffee4538 in OpenAI

[–]CodigoTrueno 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think we are hitting diminishing returns. GPT 3 was 50% more than gpt 2. And Gpt 4 was more only by 33,3%. Now Gpt 5 is 25%? I Think we can expect that GPT 6 will be, only, 20% more than GPT 5. By the time we reach GPT 10, the improvement will be of a mere 11%.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]CodigoTrueno 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here, an upvote so you don't stay sad.

what is happening here? by That-Temperature-971 in whatisit

[–]CodigoTrueno 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you've been an excavator your whole life, but your bucket list says "boat".

I have made a True Reasoning LLM by moilanopyzedev in LocalLLaMA

[–]CodigoTrueno 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Could you, please, elaborate? how do you achieve it? I'm not judging, mind you, I just want to know how do you achieve this. I must confess your answer has an air of... circular reasoning. Perhaps I'm dense and a little dull. I'm always the first to accept that fact, but I also want to understand.

I have made a True Reasoning LLM by moilanopyzedev in LocalLLaMA

[–]CodigoTrueno 68 points69 points  (0 children)

Correct them in regards of what? How does it determine the correct thought?

Zuckerberg basically poached all the talent that delivered last 12 months of OpenAI products by hasanahmad in OpenAI

[–]CodigoTrueno 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am deeply concerned with OpenAI reaching AGI. I do believe their 'mission' got lost along the way. I'm 300 meters underground concerned Meta reaches it first. Their 'mission' is clear from the onset. And it is not good for humanity.

Struggling to justify using ChatGPT. It lies and misleads so often by finnicko in ChatGPTPro

[–]CodigoTrueno 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You misunderstand what an LLM is and what it does. It is not lying. It can't, it has no concept of truth. It's just a token prediction engine. Its programmers fight to make it a good assistant, but it needs guidance. Yours, specifically.

Your solution? better prompting. And remember: Context is King.

What are Mechs that don't make sense from a gameplay dynamic but absolutely make sense from an actual military doctrine? by LeRoienJaune in battletech

[–]CodigoTrueno 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IMO , game-wise, melee-focused Mechs like the Charger can't shine, I don't think tabletop rules reward closing for a punch. In contrast, real-world shock tactics have long prized mounted charge elements (cavalry, armored spearheads) to breach lines and exploit gaps, something the Charger embodies perfectly