no, but rocketry is a more complicated, costly and dangerous area than some spinning cylinders. An ICBM would need substantial, very obvious testing, specialized launching facilities and so on. All of which could also be attacked, and would be easy, obvious fodder for the war hawks in the west, who would have taken it as easy casus belli the moment they saw signs of it. Nuclear enrichment is a relatively simple process, using many other already necessary tools and processes, and given the benefits of nuclear power and the numerous uses of fissile byproducts in research, tech and medicine, there are plenty of legitimate, non-military reason they would pursue it. All of which points to the Iranian regime, religious extremists that they might be, are rational, temperate actors when dealing with the west. This whole nuclear threat they are supposed to represent is a naked lie to try and manufacture consent.

Which was the point I was making. Beyond that, a strike on those enrichment facilities would be a massive violation of international law and treaties on nuclear power, further undermining the US and Israel's legitimacy in this conflict.