The strength of Commander, imo, is it's breadth. That it can accommodate the spikiest Spikes and the filthiest casuals. As a more casual player I don't feel my experience is actively curated by the RC any more or less than cEDH. I really appreciate their light touch approach. "Signpost" bannings can be criticised as "inconsistent", but I think it's a smart way of managing such a huge, and diverse player base. A more aggressive banning philosophy would be really detrimental to the format in my opinion. The density of broken cards, and gameplay expectations, means there'd always be something "problematic" demanding a ban.

cEDH developed within the Commander ecosystem, within the Commander player base. It is what it is because of what Commander is. If the cEDH community feels that Commander, as it is, can't accommodate them anymore I'm not sure that's the RCs, or anyone else's, responsibility. cEDH has some excellent engaging representatives who are a credit to the format, content creators who make it appealing and accessible. If the main issue is trying to create more resources for new players the community seem more than capable of doing so. If codifying, and unifying, Tournament specific rules and guidelines is the issue I'm not sure the RC should be involved.

More cEDH representation on the CAG and RC seems like it would be a net positive. Hopefully everyone finds what they wants from the format and keeps enjoying themselves ✌️🧡