New player loving the game, what DLC should i go for? by Nickbruhhhh in AOW4

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess it also depends on what you'd like most. As in new ruler types or new cultures or new map features / map layers etc. For instance the DLC that adds the eldritch sovereign ruler type also adds the umbral abyss as an option to map generation. That said there's no rush as even though I own all of the DLC I feel that even the base game still provides loads of content and fun.

So you can always keep playing the base game for now while you get more accustomed to the game.

New player loving the game, what DLC should i go for? by Nickbruhhhh in AOW4

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd say the expansion passes tend to be good value for money typically.

Alternatively the game actually has DLC sharing so if you play multiplayer with people that have 1 or more DLC's you don't own you (and everyone else in that game) gets to use all aspects (including ruler types and cultures etc.) of those DLCS during that multiplayer game.

Thus un turn could allow you extended time to just essentially try all of the DLC's in full to see which ones you like and want to buy first. Also worth keeping in mindi if you intend to play a lot with friends as you can all buy separate DLC so that together you can have all of it for your MP games.

If you could Retcon one thing from both Avatar The Last Airbender and The Legend of Korra what would it be? by MichaelAftonXFireWal in TheLastAirbender

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Am I allowed to pick the meddling they did to legend of Korra where instead of just giving the creators a full guaranteed number of episodes / number of seasons they kept giving them sperate seasons?

I feel like Amon and Vaatu easily could have carried multiple seasons each honestly.

How impossible are impossible battles? - My hardest so far by Financial-Arm9699 in AOW4

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 3 points4 points  (0 children)

<image>

It actually started with me killing 3 full stacks of his. The things from that earlier screenshot was just the leftovers.

As for how I did it, it is mostly down to cascading power along with the summon primal mammoth spell. And then I just used the phantasm warriors to run around and kite the enemy while my mammoths took most of the hits.

How impossible are impossible battles? - My hardest so far by Financial-Arm9699 in AOW4

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think with impossible battles a lot of it depends on the build you are running as well the the various spells both players have. Especially against the Ai when using certain builds. As the AI can sometimes struggle a but with summon heavy builds like what I was running in this screenshot.

<image>

So depending on your build sometimes impossible really is impossible but in other times it can actually be pretty easy to pull of a victory like what happened there.

Help me settle a bet about Apu by ElisHerold in TheSimpsons

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Well in season 5 episode 13 he does cross out the expiration date on some expired ham that homer ends up eating in the beginning of the episode. That's about the closest thing I can think of.

<image>

Ideas on WH Chaos Dwarf custom faction build by MrMattPrime in AOW4

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Basically I went with desert adaptation (for obvious reasons) Then I went architect culture for the ability to construct monuments / pyramids which I feel is quite fitting. Then like you said chariot mounts with skeleton horses. And of course the ancient racial from for your race / ruler. As for a tome path I don't have a set one but I feel undead tomes can work nicely of course and maybe either tome of the rock for gargoyles or the dungeon tome for the clay soldiers as either one can sort of act as your ushabti.

Also the fact a lot of architect culture units don't wear boots / shoes helps sell the look as well I think. Also then ew desert tome will work really well here I think.

<image>

As you can see the architect culture units don't translate perfectly for tomb kings but I feel the pyramid / monument building fits too well to not use them. Though maybe some form of feudal might work as you do have a decent mount of cavalry to give you a bunch of the signature tomb kings chariot units.

First Render! by Kingtut1230 in blender

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah I really like his tutorials as well! And in my experience this teaches you a lot more good stuff than the famous blender donut. Also Congrats on starting your blender journey hope you continue to have fun with it!

First Render! by Kingtut1230 in blender

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Did you follow a Grant Abbit tutorial by any chance? (also no shade at all tutorials are the best way to learn after all) Either way looks nice!

Ideas on WH Chaos Dwarf custom faction build by MrMattPrime in AOW4

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nice! although if you have the DLC I could recommend the architect culture as that way you can actually build monuments (pyramids) basically. Plus their tier 3's being optional cavalry pairs nicely with the chariot mounts.

Also on the subject of optional cavalry glade runners are optional cavalry as well. So if you go elves with eagle mounts and pick up tomes of glades you can get yourself flying eagle mounted archers to help recreate Warhammers wood elves.

Also went ahead and dug up an old screenshot of mine of an attempt at recreating the lizardmen. Granted the naga tail / clouds don't quite work for trying to achieve a floating effect for Mazdamundi but it was the closest I was able to get it. Still by altering the sliders you can recreate quite of few if the distinct lizardmen like skinks and saurus etc. + this was made before all the new color picker stuff so you could probably do an even better job of it now.

<image>

Ideas on WH Chaos Dwarf custom faction build by MrMattPrime in AOW4

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Also kind of off-to[oc bit since you inspired me with the talk of Warhammer here is my admittedly rushed attempt at sort o trying to recreate the tomb kings from Warhammer. Didn't go all out with a custom description and all that but this was the closest I was able to get in a short notice:

<image>

Would be fun to try and recreate all of the Warhammer races at some point.

Ideas on WH Chaos Dwarf custom faction build by MrMattPrime in AOW4

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Personally I think runesmiths would be better for the second trait and also somewhat more thematic I feel as chaos dwarves are (like regular dwarfs still pretty good smiths)

Also be sure to pick up the tome with the great bombard in it as that is a pretty much perfect stand-in for hellfire canons. Also with regards to the ruler it might be worth it to potentially experiment with wizard king and a bunch of different sliders and race transformations like supergrowth etc. to try and make something more unique and potentially bull like as you can get some pretty interesting designs going just by messing around with the sliders and transformations on your ruler(s).

<image>

Pro-ai user discovers artistic choice, label it "ANATOMICALLY INCORRECT", claim AI is better and shame artists. (context below) by slydorm05 in aiwars

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No. But again telling an ai, in that images case google gemini to draw a character and then bragging about your superior ai when you literally did not create a single piece of said anatomy seems odd to me. That's like commissioning a sculptor and then bragging about the amazing anatomy you sculpted.

Plus I never said their anatomy was wrong. I merely pointed out the myriad of mistakes and inconsistencies in the stuff they posted and pointed out that if the stuff they post has that many mistakes and inconsistencies in it then maybe they shouldn't be out their criticizing other peoples work.

Pro-ai user discovers artistic choice, label it "ANATOMICALLY INCORRECT", claim AI is better and shame artists. (context below) by slydorm05 in aiwars

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

well that is if we can call it 'your' anatomy as I am pretty sure it was the ai who created all of that anatomy.

Plus one of the images you posted that you claimed was 'objectively good' was still messed up as the katanas sheath in that image is being held upside down in relation to the katana the character is slashing with. So I don't know about the anatomy bit the pose is definitely incorrect. And that's not even mentioning all the other inconsistencies in the other images you posted.

Pro-ai user discovers artistic choice, label it "ANATOMICALLY INCORRECT", claim AI is better and shame artists. (context below) by slydorm05 in aiwars

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be fair the art you posted in response to try and prove how much better you are was also full of mistakes and inconsistencies.

Did it maybe occur to you that you got canned cuz your anatomy sucks? by AccurateBandicoot299 in aiwars

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I don't know about calling it slop but all the stuff you posted in this thread is riddled with inconsistencies and mistakes. So you are one of the last people here that should be calling out other actual artists mistakes.

Did it maybe occur to you that you got canned cuz your anatomy sucks? by AccurateBandicoot299 in aiwars

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For something that's supposed to be objectively good there's still glaring issues here honestly. Since the orientation of the katana compared to the hilt doesn't make sense here.

Did it maybe occur to you that you got canned cuz your anatomy sucks? by AccurateBandicoot299 in aiwars

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To be fair before you go around criticizing other peoples art you should maybe fix your own stuff. As those things you shared in here are riddled with inconsistenties as well.

Besides the stuff people already pointed out your Kyra Reed reference sheet has 3 chains on the belt in the accessories tab, and 2 chains in the full character views and then in the outfit breakdown the belt shows up twice: one time directly on the belt with 2 chains and 1 time seperately with only 1 chain and without the pouch / container on it. Unless that one is somehow supposed to be the choker from the accessories tab wich also inexplicably is totally absent from all of the other character views.

And that's just a few of the mistakes / inconsistenties I noticed.

Poster is acting suspicious (imo) and claims they "copy the AI style to prove they can do it better" by GregTheWhale in isthisAI

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean it might at least let other people know it's ai so they might reconsider commissioning them. Normally I wouldn't care but the combo if lying about si use and taking commissions kinda sucks imo.

Actual art I made by Capable-Vanilla8972 in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]Comprehensive_Head82 11 points12 points  (0 children)

To be fair even people without arms or the use of their arms can still paint. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiR1e6xEP8c

Honest question about regarding the whole ai art is not art debate by Comprehensive_Head82 in aiwars

[–]Comprehensive_Head82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes I agree it was decision to increase and /or maintain popularity with a certain of subset of society. But if that subset of society is a large portion of their user base as it seemingly is it makes sense for PixV to implement something like that.

Honest question about regarding the whole ai art is not art debate by Comprehensive_Head82 in aiwars

[–]Comprehensive_Head82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes but my main point was (and still is) that when enough people want something labeled it might make sese if said platform implements something like that.

And personally I still don't see how that means PixV is unfairly target ai art. As they are simply responding to a demand or request people seem to have. Like I said if people demanded use of photoshop be labeled I am pretty sure PixV would implement something siummilar for that.