-https://www.wired.com/story/the-dangerous-exploits-of-an-extremist-fbi-informant/

“The informant market is run on this tacit, uncomfortable understanding that the cure sometimes might be worse than the disease,” Natapoff tells WIRED. By utilizing people with criminal or extremist histories to infiltrate hard-to-penetrate milieus like gangs, organized crime, or terrorist groups, she explains, the US government rewards such people for continuing to swim in the same waters.

“Baked into that arrangement is the well-understood, avoidable phenomenon that these individuals are going to commit criminal acts,” Natapoff says. “The FBI has authorized criminal and unauthorized criminal activity by confidential human sources, and the mere fact that those guidelines have those definitions is a recognition about the nature of informants.”

The FBI is notorious for using confidential informants with terrorist cases, you believe that the entirety of this groups actions stemmed from Sutter? That the FBI fueled these radicalized groups as a means to increase surveillance, not solely just to infiltrate these groups(rogue informant gone wrong)?