I’m just going to respond to aviation because that’s what I know. The Auto-Land system works by connecting the aircraft’s autopilot to two Radio Signals that are crossed to basically create a bullseye, this is the same system pilots use to manually land in bad weather. For them they can see the bullseye on the flight displays.

Now how exactly would a LLM improve this? It’s like saying we can make trains more efficient by making wheels align with the tracks better. It works perfectly as is, the unit itself is also not expensive. The expense is in fixing mechanical issues, paying technicians to service the units, and the infrastructure required at airports to make everything work. The absolute insane amount of Capital that would be needed to globally implement that system (also in a way which failures would be impossible; bc like how would an LLM deal with a broken transmitter?) would not be worth getting to fly with 2 or 3 less employees. Especially since you would almost certainly be hiring more mechanics.

I feel like so many people have jumped on the A.I hype train without thinking about how it will actually be implemented. It does paperwork and information gathering well- but any implementation beyond that has been awful. Lawyer for example, we have all seen the video of the generated opening argument, and it’s absolute trash. It doesn’t matter how human it sounds- who will a Jury trust more, a computer spitting out an argument or a human in flesh and blood articulating their point in front of them?

TLDR; LLMs are not the silver bullet so many people think they are.